Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] Bluetooth: bfusb: Fix use-after-free and memory leak in device lifecycle
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 06:32:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025073101-upon-lilac-9d22@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aIrSp18mz3GS67a1@pc>

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 03:19:19AM +0100, Salah Triki wrote:
> The driver stores a reference to the `usb_device` structure (`udev`)
> in its private data (`data->udev`), which can persist beyond the
> immediate context of the `bfusb_probe()` function.
> 
> Without proper reference count management, this can lead to two issues:
> 
> 1. A `use-after-free` scenario if `udev` is accessed after its main
>    reference count drops to zero (e.g., if the device is disconnected
>    and the `data` structure is still active).

How can that happen as during the probe/remove cycle, the reference
count is always properly incremetned.

> 2. A `memory leak` if `udev`'s reference count is not properly
>    decremented during driver disconnect, preventing the `usb_device`
>    object from being freed.

There is no leak here at all, sorry.

> To correctly manage the `udev` lifetime, explicitly increment its
> reference count with `usb_get_dev(udev)` when storing it in the
> driver's private data. Correspondingly, decrement the reference count
> with `usb_put_dev(data->udev)` in the `bfusb_disconnect()` callback.
> 
> This ensures `udev` remains valid while referenced by the driver's
> private data and is properly released when no longer needed.

How was this tested?

I'm not saying the change is wrong, just that I don't think it's
actually a leak, or fix of anything real.

Or do you have a workload that shows this is needed?  If so, what is the
crash reported?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-31  4:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-31  2:19 [PATCH V3] Bluetooth: bfusb: Fix use-after-free and memory leak in device lifecycle Salah Triki
2025-07-31  4:32 ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-07-31 11:20   ` Salah Triki
2025-07-31 11:52     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025073101-upon-lilac-9d22@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=salah.triki@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox