From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, sashal@kernel.org,
Robert Pang <robertpang@google.com>, Coly Li <colyli@kernel.org>,
Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y] Revert "bcache: remove heap-related macros and switch to generic min_heap"
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 14:41:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025073126-stapling-glitzy-225a@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250731123819.31647-1-visitorckw@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 08:38:19PM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> This reverts commit 866898efbb25bb44fd42848318e46db9e785973a.
>
> The generic bottom-up min_heap implementation causes performance
> regression in invalidate_buckets_lru(), a hot path in bcache. Before the
> cache is fully populated, new_bucket_prio() often returns zero, leading to
> many equal comparisons. In such cases, bottom-up sift_down performs up to
> 2 * log2(n) comparisons, while the original top-down approach completes
> with just O() comparisons, resulting in a measurable performance gap.
>
> The performance degradation is further worsened by the non-inlined
> min_heap API functions introduced in commit 92a8b224b833 ("lib/min_heap:
> introduce non-inline versions of min heap API functions"), adding function
> call overhead to this critical path.
>
> As reported by Robert, bcache now suffers from latency spikes, with P100
> (max) latency increasing from 600 ms to 2.4 seconds every 5 minutes.
> These regressions degrade bcache's effectiveness as a low-latency cache
> layer and lead to frequent timeouts and application stalls in production
> environments.
>
> This revert aims to restore bcache's original low-latency behavior.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAJhEC05+0S69z+3+FB2Cd0hD+pCRyWTKLEOsc8BOmH73p1m+KQ@mail.gmail.com
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250614202353.1632957-3-visitorckw@gmail.com
> Fixes: 866898efbb25 ("bcache: remove heap-related macros and switch to generic min_heap")
> Fixes: 92a8b224b833 ("lib/min_heap: introduce non-inline versions of min heap API functions")
> Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Robert Pang <robertpang@google.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bcache/CAJhEC06F_AtrPgw2-7CvCqZgeStgCtitbD-ryuPpXQA-JG5XXw@mail.gmail.com
> Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ching-Chun (Jim) Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>
> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c | 64 +++++-------------
> drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h | 2 +-
> drivers/md/bcache/bset.c | 124 ++++++++++++----------------------
> drivers/md/bcache/bset.h | 40 ++++++-----
> drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 69 ++++++++-----------
> drivers/md/bcache/extents.c | 53 ++++++---------
> drivers/md/bcache/movinggc.c | 41 +++--------
> drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 3 +-
> drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 4 +-
> drivers/md/bcache/util.h | 67 +++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 13 ++--
> 11 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 263 deletions(-)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-31 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-31 12:38 [PATCH 6.12.y] Revert "bcache: remove heap-related macros and switch to generic min_heap" Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-07-31 12:41 ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-07-31 22:19 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025073126-stapling-glitzy-225a@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=colyli@kernel.org \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=robertpang@google.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=visitorckw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox