From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Qingfeng Hao <qingfeng.hao@windriver.com>
Cc: cve@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, zhe.he@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH vulns 0/1] change the sha1 for CVE-2024-26661
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 09:41:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025080132-landlady-stilt-e9f2@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250801040635.4190980-1-qingfeng.hao@windriver.com>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 12:06:34PM +0800, Qingfeng Hao wrote:
> There is a fix 17ba9cde11c2bfebbd70867b0a2ac4a22e573379
> introduced in v6.8 to fix the problem introduced by
> the original fix 66951d98d9bf45ba25acf37fe0747253fafdf298,
> and they together fix the CVE-2024-26661.
Those are two different things, shouldn't they get different CVE ids?
> Since this is the first time I submit the changes on vulns project,
> not sure if the changes in my patch are exact, @Greg, please point
> out the problems if there are and I will fix them.
There's never a need to modify the .dyad or .json files (hint, you also
did not touch the .mbox file.) they are all auto-generated from the
.sha1 file.
But again, I don't think this is correct, either this specific CVE is
not a CVE (i.e. it doesn't actually fix an issue), or we need to assign
another one, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-01 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-01 4:06 [PATCH vulns 0/1] change the sha1 for CVE-2024-26661 Qingfeng Hao
2025-08-01 4:06 ` [PATCH vulns 1/1] CVE-2024-26661: change the sha1 of the cve id Qingfeng Hao
2025-08-01 7:41 ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-08-01 12:04 ` [PATCH vulns 0/1] change the sha1 for CVE-2024-26661 Hao, Qingfeng
2025-08-02 8:19 ` Greg KH
2025-08-04 7:47 ` Qingfeng Hao
2025-08-11 15:31 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025080132-landlady-stilt-e9f2@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cve@kernel.org \
--cc=qingfeng.hao@windriver.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhe.he@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox