From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42BF9278E63; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754996032; cv=none; b=OfuCSZ86kwLuu2IzomXdfCRESHHXB5woNx52YIaPZA3V1K9JYvU8MouGfcl2SS3vQspMNfCMYkwPDk6Uh3/vAkfWo4kO/6m3s6q7eY7eoTZdo+5kLbZwWXZm7GwZgqQ5GhdJzOW/kapesze0MpWg5WKQaJxOrAbomPanMJFYiOs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754996032; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GQ9ik5dESW9PcRCrAb6yPIRPQeomQdS9+zFaj7jIhkY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tMe6mQyGD786VSEej0ldfPI9BBCGgE4fLZdgOTDfHWm37X17kNrfffziyo6zoW+oIotqVJyCv0o94nTG3hxgby4IE3sNFt8tUSyc8SGKnGVvlvFD+o2LvM0yxqO3JRnWvH5rnPj2sUbwPV9qndNFH+dlGgDSM8OQ/vCAb4VCzzo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=Q4UEVKfO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="Q4UEVKfO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A3FAC4CEF0; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:53:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1754996032; bh=GQ9ik5dESW9PcRCrAb6yPIRPQeomQdS9+zFaj7jIhkY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q4UEVKfOf8TdbELhB1zQZ5shPID4F9nI4swN8U9oVvRZPi+Mu4FSkYsTq/imieoFY bD6BtnuvHZ5o8FFE38/AuHw50qHCo7kSmoew7Oy3LfHRIe6lk2HuLAqRK6DnPAX/w2 Lc6G/4o4ZCOzMfaH6Mz4KMC0P3wCcPYRvlCKQqj8= Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 12:53:49 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com, Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: Patch "pwm: rockchip: Round period/duty down on apply, up on get" has been added to the 6.16-stable tree Message-ID: <2025081209-vista-preorder-bd6f@gregkh> References: <20250808223033.1417018-1-sashal@kernel.org> <2025081236-moneyless-enigmatic-891b@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 12:36:48PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Greg, > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 10:53:11AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 11:45:23AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > while the new code makes the driver match the PWM rules now, I'd be > > > conservative and not backport that patch because while I consider it a > > > (very minor) fix that's a change in behaviour and maybe people depend on > > > that old behaviour. So let's not break our user's workflows and reserve > > > that for a major release. Please drop this patch from your queue. > > > > Now dropped, but note, any behavior change is ok for ANY kernel version > > as we guarantee they all work the same :) > > Your statement makes no sense, I guess you missed to add a "don't". > Otherwise I'd like to know who "we" is :-) {sigh} yes, I mean "any behavior change is NOT ok..." sorry, greg k-h