From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: john.ernberg@actia.se,kuba@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: usbnet: Avoid potential RCU stall on LINK_CHANGE event" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 17:21:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025081258-value-bobbing-e1b7@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 0d9cfc9b8cb17dbc29a98792d36ec39a1cf1395f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025081258-value-bobbing-e1b7@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 0d9cfc9b8cb17dbc29a98792d36ec39a1cf1395f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Ernberg <john.ernberg@actia.se>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:25:35 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] net: usbnet: Avoid potential RCU stall on LINK_CHANGE event
The Gemalto Cinterion PLS83-W modem (cdc_ether) is emitting confusing link
up and down events when the WWAN interface is activated on the modem-side.
Interrupt URBs will in consecutive polls grab:
* Link Connected
* Link Disconnected
* Link Connected
Where the last Connected is then a stable link state.
When the system is under load this may cause the unlink_urbs() work in
__handle_link_change() to not complete before the next usbnet_link_change()
call turns the carrier on again, allowing rx_submit() to queue new SKBs.
In that event the URB queue is filled faster than it can drain, ending up
in a RCU stall:
rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected expedited stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 0-.... } 33108 jiffies s: 201 root: 0x1/.
rcu: blocking rcu_node structures (internal RCU debug):
Sending NMI from CPU 1 to CPUs 0:
NMI backtrace for cpu 0
Call trace:
arch_local_irq_enable+0x4/0x8
local_bh_enable+0x18/0x20
__netdev_alloc_skb+0x18c/0x1cc
rx_submit+0x68/0x1f8 [usbnet]
rx_alloc_submit+0x4c/0x74 [usbnet]
usbnet_bh+0x1d8/0x218 [usbnet]
usbnet_bh_tasklet+0x10/0x18 [usbnet]
tasklet_action_common+0xa8/0x110
tasklet_action+0x2c/0x34
handle_softirqs+0x2cc/0x3a0
__do_softirq+0x10/0x18
____do_softirq+0xc/0x14
call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x34
do_softirq_own_stack+0x18/0x20
__irq_exit_rcu+0xa8/0xb8
irq_exit_rcu+0xc/0x30
el1_interrupt+0x34/0x48
el1h_64_irq_handler+0x14/0x1c
el1h_64_irq+0x68/0x6c
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0x48
xhci_urb_dequeue+0x1ac/0x45c [xhci_hcd]
unlink1+0xd4/0xdc [usbcore]
usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x70/0xb0 [usbcore]
usb_unlink_urb+0x24/0x44 [usbcore]
unlink_urbs.constprop.0.isra.0+0x64/0xa8 [usbnet]
__handle_link_change+0x34/0x70 [usbnet]
usbnet_deferred_kevent+0x1c0/0x320 [usbnet]
process_scheduled_works+0x2d0/0x48c
worker_thread+0x150/0x1dc
kthread+0xd8/0xe8
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Get around the problem by delaying the carrier on to the scheduled work.
This needs a new flag to keep track of the necessary action.
The carrier ok check cannot be removed as it remains required for the
LINK_RESET event flow.
Fixes: 4b49f58fff00 ("usbnet: handle link change")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: John Ernberg <john.ernberg@actia.se>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250723102526.1305339-1-john.ernberg@actia.se
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
index c04e715a4c2a..bc1d8631ffe0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
@@ -1122,6 +1122,9 @@ static void __handle_link_change(struct usbnet *dev)
* tx queue is stopped by netcore after link becomes off
*/
} else {
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(EVENT_LINK_CARRIER_ON, &dev->flags))
+ netif_carrier_on(dev->net);
+
/* submitting URBs for reading packets */
tasklet_schedule(&dev->bh);
}
@@ -2009,10 +2012,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(usbnet_manage_power);
void usbnet_link_change(struct usbnet *dev, bool link, bool need_reset)
{
/* update link after link is reseted */
- if (link && !need_reset)
- netif_carrier_on(dev->net);
- else
+ if (link && !need_reset) {
+ set_bit(EVENT_LINK_CARRIER_ON, &dev->flags);
+ } else {
+ clear_bit(EVENT_LINK_CARRIER_ON, &dev->flags);
netif_carrier_off(dev->net);
+ }
if (need_reset && link)
usbnet_defer_kevent(dev, EVENT_LINK_RESET);
diff --git a/include/linux/usb/usbnet.h b/include/linux/usb/usbnet.h
index 0b9f1e598e3a..4bc6bb01a0eb 100644
--- a/include/linux/usb/usbnet.h
+++ b/include/linux/usb/usbnet.h
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct usbnet {
# define EVENT_LINK_CHANGE 11
# define EVENT_SET_RX_MODE 12
# define EVENT_NO_IP_ALIGN 13
+# define EVENT_LINK_CARRIER_ON 14
/* This one is special, as it indicates that the device is going away
* there are cyclic dependencies between tasklet, timer and bh
* that must be broken
next reply other threads:[~2025-08-12 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-12 15:21 gregkh [this message]
2025-08-13 13:44 ` [PATCH 5.10.y] net: usbnet: Avoid potential RCU stall on LINK_CHANGE event Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025081258-value-bobbing-e1b7@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.ernberg@actia.se \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).