Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6] sched/fair: Fix frequency selection for non-invariant case
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 19:15:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025081531-spectacle-cubicle-8a01@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_7A3AC9F50BB7F1803289E2C9@qq.com>

On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 01:01:44AM +0800, Wentao Guan wrote:
> From ddd3f1ed6e88d88502d2b42e159ac976b4194b78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 19:36:00 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix frequency selection for non-invariant case
> 
> Linus reported a ~50% performance regression on single-threaded
> workloads on his AMD Ryzen system, and bisected it to:
> 
>   9c0b4bb7f630 ("sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation")
> 
> When frequency invariance is not enabled, get_capacity_ref_freq(policy)
> is supposed to return the current frequency and the performance margin
> applied by map_util_perf(), enabling the utilization to go above the
> maximum compute capacity and to select a higher frequency than the current one.
> 
> After the changes in 9c0b4bb7f630, the performance margin was applied
> earlier in the path to take into account utilization clampings and
> we couldn't get a utilization higher than the maximum compute capacity,
> and the CPU remained 'stuck' at lower frequencies.
> 
> To fix this, we must use a frequency above the current frequency to
> get a chance to select a higher OPP when the current one becomes fully used.
> Apply the same margin and return a frequency 25% higher than the current
> one in order to switch to the next OPP before we fully use the CPU
> at the current one.
> 
> [ mingo: Clarified the changelog. ]
> 
> Fixes: 9c0b4bb7f630 ("sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation")
> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Bisected-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Reported-by: Wyes Karny <wkarny@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Wyes Karny <wkarny@gmail.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240114183600.135316-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
> (cherry picked from commit e37617c8e53a1f7fcba6d5e1041f4fd8a2425c27)
> Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>
> ---
> I tested the patch two days ago, and the upstream commit can be directly apply.
> ---
> ---
>  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index cfe7c625d2ad6..819ec1ccc08cf 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,11 @@ unsigned long get_capacity_ref_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	if (arch_scale_freq_invariant())
>  		return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
>  
> -	return policy->cur;
> +	/*
> +	 * Apply a 25% margin so that we select a higher frequency than
> +	 * the current one before the CPU is fully busy:
> +	 */
> +	return policy->cur + (policy->cur >> 2);
>  }
>  
>  /**

Does not apply against the latest 6.6.y kernel release :(

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-15 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-15 16:48 [PATCH 6.6] sched/fair: Fix frequency selection for non-invariant case Wentao Guan
2025-08-15 16:57 ` gregkh
2025-08-15 17:01   ` Wentao Guan
2025-08-15 17:15     ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-08-15 17:29       ` Wentao Guan
2025-08-15 17:32         ` Wentao Guan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025081531-spectacle-cubicle-8a01@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guanwentao@uniontech.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox