From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BAD115D1 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2025 14:05:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755439524; cv=none; b=upJ99b5ZO9u1xHor27uigkafmVEXhY1uTcucLVDruripZWhCUvSXSC5kB8y7FjVUjphkY3KbSUx7HQuRuJ3pp8qW8W64jYZZe7lddX2M3PZpcGY7FdX1rB5G4pM0s47zcXESBltGMb+CaI3zYGdGb2VQ0gBEHVu8Z8blZeMuuA8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755439524; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PJ17ZBM8vnBMeQbb0Ut90UvV0t+Aze88KGdtfeCQtHk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=A0N6auuoSM+WYjWBSc2247acTKrnrqeJkUFIzJlI/JByLaF1UgBKziZW3VDrhMnK4OTWNyurANf0L5qV2YlrVB0n+XjKoH4wWrN7ciwQelF0jHNvkuXtl8LW03F5jMPBtVH7K43mTQec84C0rHlnuXQuCA8YPqiYeQY0EhbWVqM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=PcY7eKah; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="PcY7eKah" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 695CBC4CEEB; Sun, 17 Aug 2025 14:05:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1755439523; bh=PJ17ZBM8vnBMeQbb0Ut90UvV0t+Aze88KGdtfeCQtHk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PcY7eKahOqiTYt5oPuXr/3kpH3/QJm3pg/3q4mC8MIZoWilGyW915w5Xe1H/vGmuB eCcxYkYW1RRTQ7NVn1epVNZMr76KhE+pv+clS130NPPu2j5Sn7puzVDZnAP6iMk+Qc /VU2EFAN13kLQUX0pG7Z+wev1YGnwodFQC7A5IJs= Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 16:05:20 +0200 From: Greg KH To: "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] [BISECTED] linux-6.6.y and linux-6.12.y: proc: use the same treatment to check proc_lseek as ones for proc_read_iter et.al Message-ID: <2025081751-accurate-eradicate-9456@gregkh> References: <20250815195616.64497967@chagall.paradoxon.rec> <2025081615-anew-willpower-adca@gregkh> <20250817134329.GC2771@pc21.mareichelt.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250817134329.GC2771@pc21.mareichelt.com> On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 03:43:29PM +0200, Markus Reichelt wrote: > * Greg KH wrote: > > > > I have bisected the issue to the commits > > > 33c778ea0bd0fa62ff590497e72562ff90f82b13 in 6.6.102 and > > > fc1072d934f687e1221d685cf1a49a5068318f34 in 6.12.42 which are both the > > > same change code-wise (upstream commit > > > ff7ec8dc1b646296f8d94c39339e8d3833d16c05). > > > > > > Reverting these commits makes xosview and gkrellm "work" again as in > > > they both show network traffic again. > > > > Is this also an issue in 6.16.1 and 6.17-rc1? > > I can confirm the issue with gkrellm on 6.16.1 (and 6.15.10 fwiw). > Great, we are bug compatible! Please work with the developers of those changes to resolve the regression in Linus's tree and then we can backport the needed fixes. thanks, greg k-h