stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: populate otime when logging an inode item" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
@ 2025-08-18 11:01 gregkh
  2025-08-19 14:33 ` [PATCH 5.10.y] btrfs: populate otime when logging an inode item Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2025-08-18 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wqu; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 1ef94169db0958d6de39f9ea6e063ce887342e2d
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025081801-ended-viewless-5ac7@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 1ef94169db0958d6de39f9ea6e063ce887342e2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 15:08:13 +0930
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: populate otime when logging an inode item

[TEST FAILURE WITH EXPERIMENTAL FEATURES]
When running test case generic/508, the test case will fail with the new
btrfs shutdown support:

generic/508       - output mismatch (see /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad)
    --- tests/generic/508.out	2022-05-11 11:25:30.806666664 +0930
    +++ /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad	2025-07-02 14:53:22.401824212 +0930
    @@ -1,2 +1,6 @@
     QA output created by 508
     Silence is golden
    +Before:
    +After : stat.btime = Thu Jan  1 09:30:00 1970
    +Before:
    +After : stat.btime = Wed Jul  2 14:53:22 2025
    ...
    (Run 'diff -u /home/adam/xfstests/tests/generic/508.out /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/508
Failures: generic/508
Failed 1 of 1 tests

Please note that the test case requires shutdown support, thus the test
case will be skipped using the current upstream kernel, as it doesn't
have shutdown ioctl support.

[CAUSE]
The direct cause the 0 time stamp in the log tree:

leaf 30507008 items 2 free space 16057 generation 9 owner TREE_LOG
leaf 30507008 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1
checksum stored e522548d
checksum calced e522548d
fs uuid 57d45451-481e-43e4-aa93-289ad707a3a0
chunk uuid d52bd3fd-5163-4337-98a7-7986993ad398
	item 0 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160
		generation 9 transid 9 size 0 nbytes 0
		block group 0 mode 100644 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0
		sequence 1 flags 0x0(none)
		atime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07)
		ctime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07)
		mtime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07)
		otime 0.0 (1970-01-01 09:30:00) <<<

But the old fs tree has all the correct time stamp:

btrfs-progs v6.12
fs tree key (FS_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0)
leaf 30425088 items 2 free space 16061 generation 5 owner FS_TREE
leaf 30425088 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1
checksum stored 48f6c57e
checksum calced 48f6c57e
fs uuid 57d45451-481e-43e4-aa93-289ad707a3a0
chunk uuid d52bd3fd-5163-4337-98a7-7986993ad398
	item 0 key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160
		generation 3 transid 0 size 0 nbytes 16384
		block group 0 mode 40755 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0
		sequence 0 flags 0x0(none)
		atime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07)
		ctime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07)
		mtime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07)
		otime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) <<<

The root cause is that fill_inode_item() in tree-log.c is only
populating a/c/m time, not the otime (or btime in statx output).

Part of the reason is that, the vfs inode only has a/c/m time, no native
btime support yet.

[FIX]
Thankfully btrfs has its otime stored in btrfs_inode::i_otime_sec and
btrfs_inode::i_otime_nsec.

So what we really need is just fill the otime time stamp in
fill_inode_item() of tree-log.c

There is another fill_inode_item() in inode.c, which is doing the proper
otime population.

Fixes: 94edf4ae43a5 ("Btrfs: don't bother committing delayed inode updates when fsyncing")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index 1e805dabfc4b..ab0815d9e7e5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -4233,6 +4233,9 @@ static void fill_inode_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	btrfs_set_timespec_sec(leaf, &item->ctime, inode_get_ctime_sec(inode));
 	btrfs_set_timespec_nsec(leaf, &item->ctime, inode_get_ctime_nsec(inode));
 
+	btrfs_set_timespec_sec(leaf, &item->otime, BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime_sec);
+	btrfs_set_timespec_nsec(leaf, &item->otime, BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime_nsec);
+
 	/*
 	 * We do not need to set the nbytes field, in fact during a fast fsync
 	 * its value may not even be correct, since a fast fsync does not wait


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5.10.y] btrfs: populate otime when logging an inode item
  2025-08-18 11:01 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: populate otime when logging an inode item" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh
@ 2025-08-19 14:33 ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2025-08-19 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: Qu Wenruo, Filipe Manana, David Sterba, Sasha Levin

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

[ Upstream commit 1ef94169db0958d6de39f9ea6e063ce887342e2d ]

[TEST FAILURE WITH EXPERIMENTAL FEATURES]
When running test case generic/508, the test case will fail with the new
btrfs shutdown support:

generic/508       - output mismatch (see /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad)
    --- tests/generic/508.out	2022-05-11 11:25:30.806666664 +0930
    +++ /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad	2025-07-02 14:53:22.401824212 +0930
    @@ -1,2 +1,6 @@
     QA output created by 508
     Silence is golden
    +Before:
    +After : stat.btime = Thu Jan  1 09:30:00 1970
    +Before:
    +After : stat.btime = Wed Jul  2 14:53:22 2025
    ...
    (Run 'diff -u /home/adam/xfstests/tests/generic/508.out /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/508
Failures: generic/508
Failed 1 of 1 tests

Please note that the test case requires shutdown support, thus the test
case will be skipped using the current upstream kernel, as it doesn't
have shutdown ioctl support.

[CAUSE]
The direct cause the 0 time stamp in the log tree:

leaf 30507008 items 2 free space 16057 generation 9 owner TREE_LOG
leaf 30507008 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1
checksum stored e522548d
checksum calced e522548d
fs uuid 57d45451-481e-43e4-aa93-289ad707a3a0
chunk uuid d52bd3fd-5163-4337-98a7-7986993ad398
	item 0 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160
		generation 9 transid 9 size 0 nbytes 0
		block group 0 mode 100644 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0
		sequence 1 flags 0x0(none)
		atime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07)
		ctime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07)
		mtime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07)
		otime 0.0 (1970-01-01 09:30:00) <<<

But the old fs tree has all the correct time stamp:

btrfs-progs v6.12
fs tree key (FS_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0)
leaf 30425088 items 2 free space 16061 generation 5 owner FS_TREE
leaf 30425088 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1
checksum stored 48f6c57e
checksum calced 48f6c57e
fs uuid 57d45451-481e-43e4-aa93-289ad707a3a0
chunk uuid d52bd3fd-5163-4337-98a7-7986993ad398
	item 0 key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160
		generation 3 transid 0 size 0 nbytes 16384
		block group 0 mode 40755 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0
		sequence 0 flags 0x0(none)
		atime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07)
		ctime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07)
		mtime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07)
		otime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) <<<

The root cause is that fill_inode_item() in tree-log.c is only
populating a/c/m time, not the otime (or btime in statx output).

Part of the reason is that, the vfs inode only has a/c/m time, no native
btime support yet.

[FIX]
Thankfully btrfs has its otime stored in btrfs_inode::i_otime_sec and
btrfs_inode::i_otime_nsec.

So what we really need is just fill the otime time stamp in
fill_inode_item() of tree-log.c

There is another fill_inode_item() in inode.c, which is doing the proper
otime population.

Fixes: 94edf4ae43a5 ("Btrfs: don't bother committing delayed inode updates when fsyncing")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ Adapted token-based API calls ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index dd1c40019412..2acf7d78b6d8 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -3909,6 +3909,11 @@ static void fill_inode_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	btrfs_set_token_timespec_nsec(&token, &item->ctime,
 				      inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec);
 
+	btrfs_set_token_timespec_sec(&token, &item->otime,
+				     BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime.tv_sec);
+	btrfs_set_token_timespec_nsec(&token, &item->otime,
+				      BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime.tv_nsec);
+
 	btrfs_set_token_inode_nbytes(&token, item, inode_get_bytes(inode));
 
 	btrfs_set_token_inode_sequence(&token, item, inode_peek_iversion(inode));
-- 
2.50.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-19 14:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-18 11:01 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: populate otime when logging an inode item" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2025-08-19 14:33 ` [PATCH 5.10.y] btrfs: populate otime when logging an inode item Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).