From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AB3A30E0D2 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 10:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755514269; cv=none; b=mA/tJGJpy25bWt54LjPOY8m8wgUf4ZXnKmprAIwschDNAjFJDrwaAA8B1MVN5G7GH/5TD36HdLZadEc/WNoZbHhtyiu6y8NRCIFjYf4vPin4UxrMw7Y6cyO3Wu13A9xMYHVjOQHL8fevsWskgPOsFQkS10tPvW1DcfoDK4GD64Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755514269; c=relaxed/simple; bh=23T9qapqVfceoTAzspVy5ApiuKiNI8D5y0R8iQ7xU00=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LQZCK+D9Gsvcj1hczBday9TkScuaF1CUF3v+Sd3IVegWTD8TwDSu3e+2YX+76hWtO9YgfS2R9i34to9IxyuTwTPNDCREwcgNhrNSgeM0hXZDZ0cilzM4drNMNghxXDvSjYWyoKSghzvfPxxEcDQ9/moTupReaeFGxI5xoN5dXFY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=lCCGhYg2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="lCCGhYg2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FF07C4CEEB; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 10:51:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1755514268; bh=23T9qapqVfceoTAzspVy5ApiuKiNI8D5y0R8iQ7xU00=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:From; b=lCCGhYg24TXdE3ofd03peDx7UiRqeayMzEJfsjINVoF9cf53695mb+IwZdySvThWz ekpU/XS5cFmVXJ/84sqWhwSM7FB6qY3GvCxI5CIyDkBUJEC+2nc3WKMwh8mJATOlpi HRSfj6lPJFYsxAhHHNJj2sr2vrWuau9m8c9rV2qc= Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xfs: fully decouple XFS_IBULK* flags from XFS_IWALK* flags" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree To: hch@lst.de,cem@kernel.org,djwong@kernel.org,stable@vger.kernel.org,zzzccc427@gmail.com Cc: From: Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 12:50:58 +0200 Message-ID: <2025081858-issuing-conclude-4ff3@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to . To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x d2845519b0723c5d5a0266cbf410495f9b8fd65c # git commit -s git send-email --to '' --in-reply-to '2025081858-issuing-conclude-4ff3@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From d2845519b0723c5d5a0266cbf410495f9b8fd65c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:19:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fully decouple XFS_IBULK* flags from XFS_IWALK* flags Fix up xfs_inumbers to now pass in the XFS_IBULK* flags into the flags argument to xfs_inobt_walk, which expects the XFS_IWALK* flags. Currently passing the wrong flags works for non-debug builds because the only XFS_IWALK* flag has the same encoding as the corresponding XFS_IBULK* flag, but in debug builds it can trigger an assert that no incorrect flag is passed. Instead just extra the relevant flag. Fixes: 5b35d922c52798 ("xfs: Decouple XFS_IBULK flags from XFS_IWALK flags") Cc: # v5.19 Reported-by: cen zhang Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c index c8c9b8d8309f..5116842420b2 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c @@ -447,17 +447,21 @@ xfs_inumbers( .breq = breq, }; struct xfs_trans *tp; + unsigned int iwalk_flags = 0; int error = 0; if (xfs_bulkstat_already_done(breq->mp, breq->startino)) return 0; + if (breq->flags & XFS_IBULK_SAME_AG) + iwalk_flags |= XFS_IWALK_SAME_AG; + /* * Grab an empty transaction so that we can use its recursive buffer * locking abilities to detect cycles in the inobt without deadlocking. */ tp = xfs_trans_alloc_empty(breq->mp); - error = xfs_inobt_walk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino, breq->flags, + error = xfs_inobt_walk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino, iwalk_flags, xfs_inumbers_walk, breq->icount, &ic); xfs_trans_cancel(tp);