Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, cen zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y] xfs: fully decouple XFS_IBULK* flags from XFS_IWALK* flags
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 23:06:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250819030606.304788-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025081859-matcher-handprint-c398@gregkh>

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

[ Upstream commit d2845519b0723c5d5a0266cbf410495f9b8fd65c ]

Fix up xfs_inumbers to now pass in the XFS_IBULK* flags into the flags
argument to xfs_inobt_walk, which expects the XFS_IWALK* flags.

Currently passing the wrong flags works for non-debug builds because
the only XFS_IWALK* flag has the same encoding as the corresponding
XFS_IBULK* flag, but in debug builds it can trigger an assert that no
incorrect flag is passed.  Instead just extra the relevant flag.

Fixes: 5b35d922c52798 ("xfs: Decouple XFS_IBULK flags from XFS_IWALK flags")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.19
Reported-by: cen zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
[ Adjust context ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c
index 44d603364d5a..bd59b34edc00 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c
@@ -422,11 +422,15 @@ xfs_inumbers(
 		.breq		= breq,
 	};
 	struct xfs_trans	*tp;
+	unsigned int		iwalk_flags = 0;
 	int			error = 0;
 
 	if (xfs_bulkstat_already_done(breq->mp, breq->startino))
 		return 0;
 
+	if (breq->flags & XFS_IBULK_SAME_AG)
+		iwalk_flags |= XFS_IWALK_SAME_AG;
+
 	/*
 	 * Grab an empty transaction so that we can use its recursive buffer
 	 * locking abilities to detect cycles in the inobt without deadlocking.
@@ -435,7 +439,7 @@ xfs_inumbers(
 	if (error)
 		goto out;
 
-	error = xfs_inobt_walk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino, breq->flags,
+	error = xfs_inobt_walk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino, iwalk_flags,
 			xfs_inumbers_walk, breq->icount, &ic);
 	xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
 out:
-- 
2.50.1


      reply	other threads:[~2025-08-19  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-18 10:50 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xfs: fully decouple XFS_IBULK* flags from XFS_IWALK* flags" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-08-19  3:06 ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250819030606.304788-1-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox