Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: selvarasu.g@samsung.com,Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com,akash.m5@samsung.com,bigeasy@linutronix.de,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,stable@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] usb: dwc3: Remove WARN_ON for device endpoint command" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2025 17:57:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025082347-mounting-plausible-6994@gregkh> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 45eae113dccaf8e502090ecf5b3d9e9b805add6f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025082347-mounting-plausible-6994@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 45eae113dccaf8e502090ecf5b3d9e9b805add6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Selvarasu Ganesan <selvarasu.g@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 18:23:05 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: Remove WARN_ON for device endpoint command
 timeouts

This commit addresses a rarely observed endpoint command timeout
which causes kernel panic due to warn when 'panic_on_warn' is enabled
and unnecessary call trace prints when 'panic_on_warn' is disabled.
It is seen during fast software-controlled connect/disconnect testcases.
The following is one such endpoint command timeout that we observed:

1. Connect
   =======
->dwc3_thread_interrupt
 ->dwc3_ep0_interrupt
  ->configfs_composite_setup
   ->composite_setup
    ->usb_ep_queue
     ->dwc3_gadget_ep0_queue
      ->__dwc3_gadget_ep0_queue
       ->__dwc3_ep0_do_control_data
        ->dwc3_send_gadget_ep_cmd

2. Disconnect
   ==========
->dwc3_thread_interrupt
 ->dwc3_gadget_disconnect_interrupt
  ->dwc3_ep0_reset_state
   ->dwc3_ep0_end_control_data
    ->dwc3_send_gadget_ep_cmd

In the issue scenario, in Exynos platforms, we observed that control
transfers for the previous connect have not yet been completed and end
transfer command sent as a part of the disconnect sequence and
processing of USB_ENDPOINT_HALT feature request from the host timeout.
This maybe an expected scenario since the controller is processing EP
commands sent as a part of the previous connect. It maybe better to
remove WARN_ON in all places where device endpoint commands are sent to
avoid unnecessary kernel panic due to warn.

Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Co-developed-by: Akash M <akash.m5@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Akash M <akash.m5@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Selvarasu Ganesan <selvarasu.g@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250808125315.1607-1-selvarasu.g@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
index 666ac432f52d..b4229aa13f37 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
@@ -288,7 +288,9 @@ void dwc3_ep0_out_start(struct dwc3 *dwc)
 	dwc3_ep0_prepare_one_trb(dep, dwc->ep0_trb_addr, 8,
 			DWC3_TRBCTL_CONTROL_SETUP, false);
 	ret = dwc3_ep0_start_trans(dep);
-	WARN_ON(ret < 0);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		dev_err(dwc->dev, "ep0 out start transfer failed: %d\n", ret);
+
 	for (i = 2; i < DWC3_ENDPOINTS_NUM; i++) {
 		struct dwc3_ep *dwc3_ep;
 
@@ -1061,7 +1063,9 @@ static void __dwc3_ep0_do_control_data(struct dwc3 *dwc,
 		ret = dwc3_ep0_start_trans(dep);
 	}
 
-	WARN_ON(ret < 0);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		dev_err(dwc->dev,
+			"ep0 data phase start transfer failed: %d\n", ret);
 }
 
 static int dwc3_ep0_start_control_status(struct dwc3_ep *dep)
@@ -1078,7 +1082,12 @@ static int dwc3_ep0_start_control_status(struct dwc3_ep *dep)
 
 static void __dwc3_ep0_do_control_status(struct dwc3 *dwc, struct dwc3_ep *dep)
 {
-	WARN_ON(dwc3_ep0_start_control_status(dep));
+	int	ret;
+
+	ret = dwc3_ep0_start_control_status(dep);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_err(dwc->dev,
+			"ep0 status phase start transfer failed: %d\n", ret);
 }
 
 static void dwc3_ep0_do_control_status(struct dwc3 *dwc,
@@ -1121,7 +1130,10 @@ void dwc3_ep0_end_control_data(struct dwc3 *dwc, struct dwc3_ep *dep)
 	cmd |= DWC3_DEPCMD_PARAM(dep->resource_index);
 	memset(&params, 0, sizeof(params));
 	ret = dwc3_send_gadget_ep_cmd(dep, cmd, &params);
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_err_ratelimited(dwc->dev,
+			"ep0 data phase end transfer failed: %d\n", ret);
+
 	dep->resource_index = 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
index 68fa2813e5f4..554f997eb8c4 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
@@ -1772,7 +1772,11 @@ static int __dwc3_stop_active_transfer(struct dwc3_ep *dep, bool force, bool int
 		dep->flags |= DWC3_EP_DELAY_STOP;
 		return 0;
 	}
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
+
+	if (ret)
+		dev_err_ratelimited(dep->dwc->dev,
+				"end transfer failed: %d\n", ret);
+
 	dep->resource_index = 0;
 
 	if (!interrupt)
@@ -4048,7 +4052,9 @@ static void dwc3_clear_stall_all_ep(struct dwc3 *dwc)
 		dep->flags &= ~DWC3_EP_STALL;
 
 		ret = dwc3_send_clear_stall_ep_cmd(dep);
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
+		if (ret)
+			dev_err_ratelimited(dwc->dev,
+				"failed to clear STALL on %s\n", dep->name);
 	}
 }
 


                 reply	other threads:[~2025-08-23 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025082347-mounting-plausible-6994@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=akash.m5@samsung.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=selvarasu.g@samsung.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox