From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, prarit@redhat.com,
x86@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 0/2] x86/irq: Plug vector setup race
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 10:37:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025082435-attribute-mounted-f09e@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250822033304.1096496-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 03:33:02AM +0000, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> There is a vector setup race, which overwrites the interrupt
> descriptor in the per CPU vector array resulting in a disfunctional device.
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> interrupt is raised in APIC IRR
> but not handled
> free_irq()
> per_cpu(vector_irq, CPU1)[vector] = VECTOR_SHUTDOWN;
>
> request_irq() common_interrupt()
> d = this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
>
> per_cpu(vector_irq, CPU1)[vector] = desc;
>
> if (d == VECTOR_SHUTDOWN)
> this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_UNUSED);
>
> free_irq() cannot observe the pending vector in the CPU1 APIC as there is
> no way to query the remote CPUs APIC IRR.
>
> This requires that request_irq() uses the same vector/CPU as the one which
> was freed, but this also can be triggered by a spurious interrupt.
>
> Interestingly enough this problem managed to be hidden for more than a
> decade.
>
> Prevent this by reevaluating vector_irq under the vector lock, which is
> held by the interrupt activation code when vector_irq is updated.
>
> The first patch provides context for subsequent real bugfix patch.
>
> Fixes: 9345005f4eed ("x86/irq: Fix do_IRQ() interrupt warning for cpu hotplug retriggered irqs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org#5.10.x
> Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
>
> v1 -> RESEND
> - Add upstream commit ID.
>
> Jacob Pan (1):
> x86/irq: Factor out handler invocation from common_interrupt()
>
> Thomas Gleixner (1):
> x86/irq: Plug vector setup race
>
> arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Dropping as I didn't take the patches for later kernels either.
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-24 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-22 3:33 [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 0/2] x86/irq: Plug vector setup race Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-22 3:33 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 1/2] x86/irq: Factor out handler invocation from common_interrupt() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-22 3:33 ` [PATCH v5.10 RESEND 2/2] x86/irq: Plug vector setup race Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-24 8:37 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025082435-attribute-mounted-f09e@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox