From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD74C2F29; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 17:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756920548; cv=none; b=DdD2sYnsLUwzDUcxKVDxEc8Taox6T1LX35n+nqenV3F6YnMt9+7Hsh7OfUlsnQwtoTJPPvulh2np9MOXXinRAC6DM7dlR3g5Jesr8YcKYN9NsWXSpRe7+82+gm7OJkJmykbH5vUnV/sHngpQAj69CCfFqPvqdG8YpuinpTwq3FU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756920548; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+jTybdYK9ArCfVLiUy0Jqkmx/KrVQ1a3l0rTTupm3FM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=k3GS+soAjQp1jH7YA3ivEEjKC6T/yhgBe97Cf87KS4qAnAfI2JfKa+xBO3LSt+ZOXeY5Y4KkTTkcF7TgJUvDkW5TdL6D0O0ggGhhiILESSbO/BOozhENkTHOaJr/Ptat9hPYzUW1oxX6BJrNcGJAqOX4FewJyu1sajQX37aNHi0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HTs8lbpr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HTs8lbpr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47582C4CEE7; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 17:29:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1756920547; bh=+jTybdYK9ArCfVLiUy0Jqkmx/KrVQ1a3l0rTTupm3FM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HTs8lbprL63AXyz1DOJPxnteZSs8TXW203xae3nDzG3YIh698YkQzSoYQmbvim9n5 nMcBA//EewfAyPlN72o45AId/nzLx0NHgKulfgGUbzHkTyqIBJkURURKkj3Gag831a wfMbCuPtI/ktOHQ4uhpqKpiAmTHQw1yr7kSRW4IjHFDtQQpfy6A2RgbMQ/alJhv68C AY9i82cJKkEi/RwQf/aWD9w3/KGQc6lADExHnl2JT64Sxrr+Si3bq/itmGyjMbynoL +hZ3Uyqc2TO3JXvFQ6/MpqnI9dX1bLwbMlt6ig3zKLBOLbIZNAIytc+1fqmyeQILpV p2g0CDSpmkGIw== Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 10:28:59 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Naresh Kamboju , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org, Madhavan Srinivasan , Venkat Rao Bagalkote , clang-built-linux , Dan Carpenter , Arnd Bergmann , Ben Copeland , Anders Roxell Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/23] 5.4.298-rc1 review Message-ID: <20250903172859.GB3288670@ax162> References: <20250902131924.720400762@linuxfoundation.org> <2025090317-envelope-professed-b38a@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2025090317-envelope-professed-b38a@gregkh> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 11:48:11AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 03:11:26PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > Build regression: stable-rc 5.4.298-rc1 powerpc/boot/util.S:44: Error: > > junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `0' > > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > Known issue, patch already submitted: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250902235234.2046667-1-nathan@kernel.org > > Will queue that up for the next round of releases, using clang-20 on > 5.4.y is brave :) Just for the record, there is nothing clang specific here, it is a binutils problem. The clang-20 TuxMake containers just happen to have a newer copy of binutils from Debian Trixie after [1]. I would expect one of the updated GCC versions to reproduce the same issue, unless they don't build 5.4 for other reasons. I always try to ensure every stable version builds with latest clang so I would not consider it that brave :) I plan to send a v2 addressing Segher's comments later today. [1]: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/tuxmake/-/commit/46280e20b8ed2df749e9115640271c0a6a2c812c Cheers, Nathan