Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	WangYuli <wangyuli@uniontech.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15.y 1/2] randstruct: gcc-plugin: Remove bogus void member
Date: Fri,  5 Sep 2025 11:52:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250905155250.1730294-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025060527-upwind-coveting-bcba@gregkh>

From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit e136a4062174a9a8d1c1447ca040ea81accfa6a8 ]

When building the randomized replacement tree of struct members, the
randstruct GCC plugin would insert, as the first member, a 0-sized void
member. This appears as though it was done to catch non-designated
("unnamed") static initializers, which wouldn't be stable since they
depend on the original struct layout order.

This was accomplished by having the side-effect of the "void member"
tripping an assert in GCC internals (count_type_elements) if the member
list ever needed to be counted (e.g. for figuring out the order of members
during a non-designated initialization), which would catch impossible type
(void) in the struct:

security/landlock/fs.c: In function ‘hook_file_ioctl_common’:
security/landlock/fs.c:1745:61: internal compiler error: in count_type_elements, at expr.cc:7075
 1745 |                         .u.op = &(struct lsm_ioctlop_audit) {
      |                                                             ^

static HOST_WIDE_INT
count_type_elements (const_tree type, bool for_ctor_p)
{
  switch (TREE_CODE (type))
...
    case VOID_TYPE:
    default:
      gcc_unreachable ();
    }
}

However this is a redundant safety measure since randstruct uses the
__designated_initializer attribute both internally and within the
__randomized_layout attribute macro so that this would be enforced
by the compiler directly even when randstruct was not enabled (via
-Wdesignated-init).

A recent change in Landlock ended up tripping the same member counting
routine when using a full-struct copy initializer as part of an anonymous
initializer. This, however, is a false positive as the initializer is
copying between identical structs (and hence identical layouts). The
"path" member is "struct path", a randomized struct, and is being copied
to from another "struct path", the "f_path" member:

        landlock_log_denial(landlock_cred(file->f_cred), &(struct landlock_request) {
                .type = LANDLOCK_REQUEST_FS_ACCESS,
                .audit = {
                        .type = LSM_AUDIT_DATA_IOCTL_OP,
                        .u.op = &(struct lsm_ioctlop_audit) {
                                .path = file->f_path,
                                .cmd = cmd,
                        },
                },
	...

As can be seen with the coming randstruct KUnit test, there appears to
be no behavioral problems with this kind of initialization when the void
member is removed from the randstruct GCC plugin, so remove it.

Reported-by: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Z_PRaKx7q70MKgCA@gallifrey/
Reported-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250407-kbuild-disable-gcc-plugins-v1-1-5d46ae583f5e@kernel.org/
Reported-by: WangYuli <wangyuli@uniontech.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/337D5D4887277B27+3c677db3-a8b9-47f0-93a4-7809355f1381@uniontech.com/
Fixes: 313dd1b62921 ("gcc-plugins: Add the randstruct plugin")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: f39f18f3c353 ("randstruct: gcc-plugin: Fix attribute addition")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c | 18 +-----------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c b/scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c
index 60e9359a71a50..a8595df5fb6e8 100644
--- a/scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c
+++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_plugin.c
@@ -377,29 +377,13 @@ static int relayout_struct(tree type)
 
 	shuffle(type, (tree *)newtree, shuffle_length);
 
-	/*
-	 * set up a bogus anonymous struct field designed to error out on unnamed struct initializers
-	 * as gcc provides no other way to detect such code
-	 */
-	list = make_node(FIELD_DECL);
-	TREE_CHAIN(list) = newtree[0];
-	TREE_TYPE(list) = void_type_node;
-	DECL_SIZE(list) = bitsize_zero_node;
-	DECL_NONADDRESSABLE_P(list) = 1;
-	DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET(list) = bitsize_zero_node;
-	DECL_SIZE_UNIT(list) = size_zero_node;
-	DECL_FIELD_OFFSET(list) = size_zero_node;
-	DECL_CONTEXT(list) = type;
-	// to satisfy the constify plugin
-	TREE_READONLY(list) = 1;
-
 	for (i = 0; i < num_fields - 1; i++)
 		TREE_CHAIN(newtree[i]) = newtree[i+1];
 	TREE_CHAIN(newtree[num_fields - 1]) = NULL_TREE;
 
 	main_variant = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT(type);
 	for (variant = main_variant; variant; variant = TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT(variant)) {
-		TYPE_FIELDS(variant) = list;
+		TYPE_FIELDS(variant) = newtree[0];
 		TYPE_ATTRIBUTES(variant) = copy_list(TYPE_ATTRIBUTES(variant));
 		TYPE_ATTRIBUTES(variant) = tree_cons(get_identifier("randomize_performed"), NULL_TREE, TYPE_ATTRIBUTES(variant));
 		TYPE_ATTRIBUTES(variant) = tree_cons(get_identifier("designated_init"), NULL_TREE, TYPE_ATTRIBUTES(variant));
-- 
2.50.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-05 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-05  8:43 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] randstruct: gcc-plugin: Fix attribute addition" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
2025-09-05 15:52 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-09-05 15:52   ` [PATCH 5.15.y 2/2] randstruct: gcc-plugin: Fix attribute addition Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250905155250.1730294-1-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@treblig.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangyuli@uniontech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox