* + mm-revert-mm-gup-clear-the-lru-flag-of-a-page-before-adding-to-lru-batch.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch
@ 2025-09-08 22:36 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2025-09-08 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, yuzhao, yuanchu, yangge1116, willy, will, weixugc,
vbabka, stable, shivankg, riel, peterx, lizhe.67, koct9i, keirf,
jhubbard, jgg, hch, hannes, david, chrisl, axelrasmussen,
aneesh.kumar, hughd, akpm
The patch titled
Subject: mm: Revert "mm/gup: clear the LRU flag of a page before adding to LRU batch"
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is
mm-revert-mm-gup-clear-the-lru-flag-of-a-page-before-adding-to-lru-batch.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-revert-mm-gup-clear-the-lru-flag-of-a-page-before-adding-to-lru-batch.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: mm: Revert "mm/gup: clear the LRU flag of a page before adding to LRU batch"
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 15:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
This reverts commit 33dfe9204f29: now that
collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios() is checking ref_count instead of lru,
and mlock/munlock do not participate in the revised LRU flag clearing,
those changes are misleading, and enlarge the window during which
mlock/munlock may miss an mlock_count update.
It is possible (I'd hesitate to claim probable) that the greater
likelihood of missed mlock_count updates would explain the "Realtime
threads delayed due to kcompactd0" observed on 6.12 in the Link below. If
that is the case, this reversion will help; but a complete solution needs
also a further patch, beyond the scope of this series.
Included some 80-column cleanup around folio_batch_add_and_move().
The role of folio_test_clear_lru() (before taking per-memcg lru_lock) is
questionable since 6.13 removed mem_cgroup_move_account() etc; but perhaps
there are still some races which need it - not examined here.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/DU0PR01MB10385345F7153F334100981888259A@DU0PR01MB10385.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/05905d7b-ed14-68b1-79d8-bdec30367eba@google.com
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keirf@google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: yangge <yangge1116@126.com>
Cc: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/swap.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/swap.c~mm-revert-mm-gup-clear-the-lru-flag-of-a-page-before-adding-to-lru-batch
+++ a/mm/swap.c
@@ -164,6 +164,10 @@ static void folio_batch_move_lru(struct
for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(fbatch); i++) {
struct folio *folio = fbatch->folios[i];
+ /* block memcg migration while the folio moves between lru */
+ if (move_fn != lru_add && !folio_test_clear_lru(folio))
+ continue;
+
folio_lruvec_relock_irqsave(folio, &lruvec, &flags);
move_fn(lruvec, folio);
@@ -176,14 +180,10 @@ static void folio_batch_move_lru(struct
}
static void __folio_batch_add_and_move(struct folio_batch __percpu *fbatch,
- struct folio *folio, move_fn_t move_fn,
- bool on_lru, bool disable_irq)
+ struct folio *folio, move_fn_t move_fn, bool disable_irq)
{
unsigned long flags;
- if (on_lru && !folio_test_clear_lru(folio))
- return;
-
folio_get(folio);
if (disable_irq)
@@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ static void __folio_batch_add_and_move(s
else
local_lock(&cpu_fbatches.lock);
- if (!folio_batch_add(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), folio) || folio_test_large(folio) ||
- lru_cache_disabled())
+ if (!folio_batch_add(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), folio) ||
+ folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
folio_batch_move_lru(this_cpu_ptr(fbatch), move_fn);
if (disable_irq)
@@ -201,13 +201,13 @@ static void __folio_batch_add_and_move(s
local_unlock(&cpu_fbatches.lock);
}
-#define folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, op, on_lru) \
- __folio_batch_add_and_move( \
- &cpu_fbatches.op, \
- folio, \
- op, \
- on_lru, \
- offsetof(struct cpu_fbatches, op) >= offsetof(struct cpu_fbatches, lock_irq) \
+#define folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, op) \
+ __folio_batch_add_and_move( \
+ &cpu_fbatches.op, \
+ folio, \
+ op, \
+ offsetof(struct cpu_fbatches, op) >= \
+ offsetof(struct cpu_fbatches, lock_irq) \
)
static void lru_move_tail(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio)
@@ -231,10 +231,10 @@ static void lru_move_tail(struct lruvec
void folio_rotate_reclaimable(struct folio *folio)
{
if (folio_test_locked(folio) || folio_test_dirty(folio) ||
- folio_test_unevictable(folio))
+ folio_test_unevictable(folio) || !folio_test_lru(folio))
return;
- folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_move_tail, true);
+ folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_move_tail);
}
void lru_note_cost_unlock_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file,
@@ -328,10 +328,11 @@ static void folio_activate_drain(int cpu
void folio_activate(struct folio *folio)
{
- if (folio_test_active(folio) || folio_test_unevictable(folio))
+ if (folio_test_active(folio) || folio_test_unevictable(folio) ||
+ !folio_test_lru(folio))
return;
- folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_activate, true);
+ folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_activate);
}
#else
@@ -507,7 +508,7 @@ void folio_add_lru(struct folio *folio)
lru_gen_in_fault() && !(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
folio_set_active(folio);
- folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_add, false);
+ folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_add);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_add_lru);
@@ -685,13 +686,13 @@ void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu)
void deactivate_file_folio(struct folio *folio)
{
/* Deactivating an unevictable folio will not accelerate reclaim */
- if (folio_test_unevictable(folio))
+ if (folio_test_unevictable(folio) || !folio_test_lru(folio))
return;
if (lru_gen_enabled() && lru_gen_clear_refs(folio))
return;
- folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_deactivate_file, true);
+ folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_deactivate_file);
}
/*
@@ -704,13 +705,13 @@ void deactivate_file_folio(struct folio
*/
void folio_deactivate(struct folio *folio)
{
- if (folio_test_unevictable(folio))
+ if (folio_test_unevictable(folio) || !folio_test_lru(folio))
return;
if (lru_gen_enabled() ? lru_gen_clear_refs(folio) : !folio_test_active(folio))
return;
- folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_deactivate, true);
+ folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_deactivate);
}
/**
@@ -723,10 +724,11 @@ void folio_deactivate(struct folio *foli
void folio_mark_lazyfree(struct folio *folio)
{
if (!folio_test_anon(folio) || !folio_test_swapbacked(folio) ||
+ !folio_test_lru(folio) ||
folio_test_swapcache(folio) || folio_test_unevictable(folio))
return;
- folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_lazyfree, true);
+ folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_lazyfree);
}
void lru_add_drain(void)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hughd@google.com are
mm-gup-check-ref_count-instead-of-lru-before-migration.patch
mm-gup-local-lru_add_drain-to-avoid-lru_add_drain_all.patch
mm-revert-mm-gup-clear-the-lru-flag-of-a-page-before-adding-to-lru-batch.patch
mm-revert-mm-vmscanc-fix-oom-on-swap-stress-test.patch
mm-folio_may_be_lru_cached-unless-folio_test_large.patch
mm-lru_add_drain_all-do-local-lru_add_drain-first.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-09-08 22:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-08 22:36 + mm-revert-mm-gup-clear-the-lru-flag-of-a-page-before-adding-to-lru-batch.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox