From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: aleksandar.gerasimovski@belden.com,Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,Stable@vger.kernel.org,mailto:rene.straub@belden.com,marius.cristea@microchip.com
Subject: patch "iio/adc/pac1934: fix channel disable configuration" added to char-misc-testing
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:31:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025091631-juiciness-work-a41b@gregkh> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
iio/adc/pac1934: fix channel disable configuration
to my char-misc git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git
in the char-misc-testing branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will be merged to the char-misc-next branch sometime soon,
after it passes testing, and the merge window is open.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
From 3c63ba1c430af1c0dcd68dd36f2246980621dcba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aleksandar Gerasimovski <aleksandar.gerasimovski@belden.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 13:09:04 +0000
Subject: iio/adc/pac1934: fix channel disable configuration
There are two problems with the chip configuration in this driver:
- First, is that writing 12 bytes (ARRAY_SIZE(regs)) would anyhow
lead to a config overflow due to HW auto increment implementation
in the chip.
- Second, the i2c_smbus_write_block_data write ends up in writing
unexpected value to the channel_dis register, this is because
the smbus size that is 0x03 in this case gets written to the
register. The PAC1931/2/3/4 data sheet does not really specify
that block write is indeed supported.
This problem is probably not visible on PAC1934 version where all
channels are used as the chip is properly configured by luck,
but in our case whenusing PAC1931 this leads to nonfunctional device.
Fixes: 0fb528c8255b (iio: adc: adding support for PAC193x)
Suggested-by: Rene Straub <mailto:rene.straub@belden.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Gerasimovski <aleksandar.gerasimovski@belden.com>
Reviewed-by: Marius Cristea <marius.cristea@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250811130904.2481790-1-aleksandar.gerasimovski@belden.com
Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
drivers/iio/adc/pac1934.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/pac1934.c b/drivers/iio/adc/pac1934.c
index 09fe88eb3fb0..2e442e46f679 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/pac1934.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/pac1934.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@
#define PAC1934_VPOWER_3_ADDR 0x19
#define PAC1934_VPOWER_4_ADDR 0x1A
#define PAC1934_REFRESH_V_REG_ADDR 0x1F
+#define PAC1934_SLOW_REG_ADDR 0x20
#define PAC1934_CTRL_STAT_REGS_ADDR 0x1C
#define PAC1934_PID_REG_ADDR 0xFD
#define PAC1934_MID_REG_ADDR 0xFE
@@ -1265,8 +1266,23 @@ static int pac1934_chip_configure(struct pac1934_chip_info *info)
/* no SLOW triggered REFRESH, clear POR */
regs[PAC1934_SLOW_REG_OFF] = 0;
- ret = i2c_smbus_write_block_data(client, PAC1934_CTRL_STAT_REGS_ADDR,
- ARRAY_SIZE(regs), (u8 *)regs);
+ /*
+ * Write the three bytes sequentially, as the device does not support
+ * block write.
+ */
+ ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, PAC1934_CTRL_STAT_REGS_ADDR,
+ regs[PAC1934_CHANNEL_DIS_REG_OFF]);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
+ PAC1934_CTRL_STAT_REGS_ADDR + PAC1934_NEG_PWR_REG_OFF,
+ regs[PAC1934_NEG_PWR_REG_OFF]);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, PAC1934_SLOW_REG_ADDR,
+ regs[PAC1934_SLOW_REG_OFF]);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.51.0
reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025091631-juiciness-work-a41b@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=aleksandar.gerasimovski@belden.com \
--cc=marius.cristea@microchip.com \
--cc=rene.straub@belden.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox