From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Niklas Neronin <niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 1/3] usb: xhci: introduce macro for ring segment list iteration
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:38:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250917123858.513814-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025091707-blip-kilometer-4c4c@gregkh>
From: Niklas Neronin <niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 3f970bd06c5295e742ef4f9cf7808a3cb74a6816 ]
Add macro to streamline and standardize the iteration over ring
segment list.
xhci_for_each_ring_seg(): Iterates over the entire ring segment list.
The xhci_free_segments_for_ring() function's while loop has not been
updated to use the new macro. This function has some underlying issues,
and as a result, it will be handled separately in a future patch.
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Neronin <niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241106101459.775897-11-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Stable-dep-of: 220a0ffde02f ("xhci: dbc: decouple endpoint allocation from initialization")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-debugfs.c | 5 +----
drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 20 ++++++++------------
drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 3 +++
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-debugfs.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-debugfs.c
index f8ba15e7c225c..570210e8a8e87 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-debugfs.c
@@ -214,14 +214,11 @@ static void xhci_ring_dump_segment(struct seq_file *s,
static int xhci_ring_trb_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
{
- int i;
struct xhci_ring *ring = *(struct xhci_ring **)s->private;
struct xhci_segment *seg = ring->first_seg;
- for (i = 0; i < ring->num_segs; i++) {
+ xhci_for_each_ring_seg(ring->first_seg, seg)
xhci_ring_dump_segment(s, seg);
- seg = seg->next;
- }
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
index 69188afa52666..80b2f946b59fe 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
@@ -224,7 +224,6 @@ static int xhci_update_stream_segment_mapping(
struct radix_tree_root *trb_address_map,
struct xhci_ring *ring,
struct xhci_segment *first_seg,
- struct xhci_segment *last_seg,
gfp_t mem_flags)
{
struct xhci_segment *seg;
@@ -234,28 +233,22 @@ static int xhci_update_stream_segment_mapping(
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(trb_address_map == NULL))
return 0;
- seg = first_seg;
- do {
+ xhci_for_each_ring_seg(first_seg, seg) {
ret = xhci_insert_segment_mapping(trb_address_map,
ring, seg, mem_flags);
if (ret)
goto remove_streams;
- if (seg == last_seg)
- return 0;
- seg = seg->next;
- } while (seg != first_seg);
+ }
return 0;
remove_streams:
failed_seg = seg;
- seg = first_seg;
- do {
+ xhci_for_each_ring_seg(first_seg, seg) {
xhci_remove_segment_mapping(trb_address_map, seg);
if (seg == failed_seg)
return ret;
- seg = seg->next;
- } while (seg != first_seg);
+ }
return ret;
}
@@ -267,17 +260,14 @@ static void xhci_remove_stream_mapping(struct xhci_ring *ring)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ring->trb_address_map == NULL))
return;
- seg = ring->first_seg;
- do {
+ xhci_for_each_ring_seg(ring->first_seg, seg)
xhci_remove_segment_mapping(ring->trb_address_map, seg);
- seg = seg->next;
- } while (seg != ring->first_seg);
}
static int xhci_update_stream_mapping(struct xhci_ring *ring, gfp_t mem_flags)
{
return xhci_update_stream_segment_mapping(ring->trb_address_map, ring,
- ring->first_seg, ring->last_seg, mem_flags);
+ ring->first_seg, mem_flags);
}
/* XXX: Do we need the hcd structure in all these functions? */
@@ -438,7 +428,7 @@ int xhci_ring_expansion(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_ring *ring,
if (ring->type == TYPE_STREAM) {
ret = xhci_update_stream_segment_mapping(ring->trb_address_map,
- ring, first, last, flags);
+ ring, first, flags);
if (ret)
goto free_segments;
}
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index d5bcd5475b72b..abbf89e82d01a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -41,15 +41,15 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(quirks, "Bit flags for quirks to be enabled as default");
static bool td_on_ring(struct xhci_td *td, struct xhci_ring *ring)
{
- struct xhci_segment *seg = ring->first_seg;
+ struct xhci_segment *seg;
if (!td || !td->start_seg)
return false;
- do {
+
+ xhci_for_each_ring_seg(ring->first_seg, seg) {
if (seg == td->start_seg)
return true;
- seg = seg->next;
- } while (seg && seg != ring->first_seg);
+ }
return false;
}
@@ -764,14 +764,10 @@ static void xhci_clear_command_ring(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
struct xhci_segment *seg;
ring = xhci->cmd_ring;
- seg = ring->deq_seg;
- do {
- memset(seg->trbs, 0,
- sizeof(union xhci_trb) * (TRBS_PER_SEGMENT - 1));
- seg->trbs[TRBS_PER_SEGMENT - 1].link.control &=
- cpu_to_le32(~TRB_CYCLE);
- seg = seg->next;
- } while (seg != ring->deq_seg);
+ xhci_for_each_ring_seg(ring->deq_seg, seg) {
+ memset(seg->trbs, 0, sizeof(union xhci_trb) * (TRBS_PER_SEGMENT - 1));
+ seg->trbs[TRBS_PER_SEGMENT - 1].link.control &= cpu_to_le32(~TRB_CYCLE);
+ }
xhci_initialize_ring_info(ring, 1);
/*
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
index 67ee2e0499433..b4fa8e7e43763 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
@@ -1263,6 +1263,9 @@ static inline const char *xhci_trb_type_string(u8 type)
#define AVOID_BEI_INTERVAL_MIN 8
#define AVOID_BEI_INTERVAL_MAX 32
+#define xhci_for_each_ring_seg(head, seg) \
+ for (seg = head; seg != NULL; seg = (seg->next != head ? seg->next : NULL))
+
struct xhci_segment {
union xhci_trb *trbs;
/* private to HCD */
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-17 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-17 7:43 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xhci: dbc: decouple endpoint allocation from initialization" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-09-17 12:38 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-09-17 12:38 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/3] usb: xhci: remove option to change a default ring's TRB cycle bit Sasha Levin
2025-09-17 12:38 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 3/3] xhci: dbc: decouple endpoint allocation from initialization Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250917123858.513814-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox