From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E2AA30504D for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760372014; cv=none; b=jbcljh6neP8lSKTmFRoXIjhfho5mx9iXcA1L+MHZAtc0fWdLumHlDW6uyS7/z3BgCb7KafU+V+r/5PUpXraMr7bcV8sn61b0lZZ+jr71+0Vxk2O7FLxsheglFi8O00ss9M0cFvksMvomCzCJeGvlOIpNdZTJOegcQwyt5To/yAU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760372014; c=relaxed/simple; bh=azNU3JfWUGCf0nszOib4Sv36wDAINQl80jSZWmf5kZw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gjPd52AITOg2N07s4EerUqpAKgau5dO+ibL7e0gLzDrtei5KOFDhOGIWZZhpUBbsKDXplTI3kL4S31lk9M2E0Lif50zWnSjgqv70E5svsYLx+M4Ca4bjVFz/d0WHGAnwRoWW8eH7sgX6Cp3vpfQvDi6hEHsCa56TXqs5zfxxmgk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b=pQSPGo7c; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="pQSPGo7c" Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (82-203-166-19.bb.dnainternet.fi [82.203.166.19]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 9E0DA557; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 18:11:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1760371912; bh=azNU3JfWUGCf0nszOib4Sv36wDAINQl80jSZWmf5kZw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pQSPGo7cczYaHDP2Ypcze0aNoBsVawmlZZZ0OgWcxC2fGeZ3lRdC2JDh0GQA9b3Ef 7jwokNrHyFYmyava0NamNVBeTfk600VaNT1N3+aGBhkbmoUm7zWCl0c7xXW7F9osZh LGJTp3byopC3O3BCT8G2+5hwzf1htlgvsCQ+ebBU= Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 19:13:23 +0300 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, syzbot+0584f746fde3d52b4675@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, syzbot+dd320d114deb3f5bb79b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Youngjun Lee , Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo , Ricardo Ribalda , Hans de Goede , Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 013/196] media: uvcvideo: Mark invalid entities with id UVC_INVALID_ENTITY_ID Message-ID: <20251013161323.GB6599@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <20251013144314.549284796@linuxfoundation.org> <20251013144315.044387377@linuxfoundation.org> <20251013150022.GB1168@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <2025101327-footpad-boxcar-7049@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2025101327-footpad-boxcar-7049@gregkh> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 05:25:55PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 06:00:22PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 04:43:06PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > 6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > This is causing a regression as reported in [1]. Ricardo is trying to > > get his hands on a device to try and develop a proper fix. In the > > meantime, can we avoid backporting this patch to any stable tree ? > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAOzBiVuS7ygUjjhCbyWg-KiNx+HFTYnqH5+GJhd6cYsNLT=DaA@mail.gmail.com > > I can drop it from this queue, but it's already in the following kernel > releases: > 6.6.110 6.12.51 6.16.11 6.17.1 6.18-rc1 Should we merge a revert as a fix for v6.18 and get it backported to stable trees, or can we revert in the stable trees directly ? It will take a couple of weeks to get hold of a device and develop a correct fix. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart