From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 2/5] NFSD: Replace use of NFSD_MAY_LOCK in nfsd4_lock()
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 18:08:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251015220846.1531878-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015220846.1531878-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
[ Upstream commit 6640556b0c80edc66d6f50abe53f00311a873536 ]
NFSv4 LOCK operations should not avoid the set of authorization
checks that apply to all other NFSv4 operations. Also, the
"no_auth_nlm" export option should apply only to NLM LOCK requests.
It's not necessary or sensible to apply it to NFSv4 LOCK operations.
Instead, set no permission bits when calling fh_verify(). Subsequent
stateid processing handles authorization checks.
Reported-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Stable-dep-of: 898374fdd7f0 ("nfsd: unregister with rpcbind when deleting a transport")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index bcb44400e2439..7b0fabf8c657a 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -7998,11 +7998,9 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
if (check_lock_length(lock->lk_offset, lock->lk_length))
return nfserr_inval;
- if ((status = fh_verify(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh,
- S_IFREG, NFSD_MAY_LOCK))) {
- dprintk("NFSD: nfsd4_lock: permission denied!\n");
+ status = fh_verify(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh, S_IFREG, 0);
+ if (status != nfs_ok)
return status;
- }
sb = cstate->current_fh.fh_dentry->d_sb;
if (lock->lk_is_new) {
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 11:00 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nfsd: unregister with rpcbind when deleting a transport" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-10-15 22:08 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/5] nfsd: Fix NFSD_MAY_BYPASS_GSS and NFSD_MAY_BYPASS_GSS_ON_ROOT Sasha Levin
2025-10-15 22:08 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-10-15 22:08 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 3/5] nfsd: refine and rename NFSD_MAY_LOCK Sasha Levin
2025-10-15 22:08 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 4/5] nfsd: don't use sv_nrthreads in connection limiting calculations Sasha Levin
2025-10-15 22:08 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 5/5] nfsd: unregister with rpcbind when deleting a transport Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251015220846.1531878-2-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox