public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 2/4] s390/bpf: Describe the frame using a struct instead of constants
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 11:19:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251017092550.88640-3-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251017092550.88640-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>

commit e26d523edf2a62b142d2dd2dd9b87f61ed92f33a upstream.

Currently the caller-allocated portion of the stack frame is described
using constants, hardcoded values, and an ASCII drawing, making it
harder than necessary to ensure that everything is in sync.

Declare a struct and use offsetof() and offsetofend() macros to refer
to various values stored within the frame.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250624121501.50536-3-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
 arch/s390/net/bpf_jit.h      | 55 ----------------------------
 arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/s390/net/bpf_jit.h

diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 7822ea92e54af..0000000000000
--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,55 +0,0 @@
-/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
-/*
- * BPF Jit compiler defines
- *
- * Copyright IBM Corp. 2012,2015
- *
- * Author(s): Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
- *	      Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
- */
-
-#ifndef __ARCH_S390_NET_BPF_JIT_H
-#define __ARCH_S390_NET_BPF_JIT_H
-
-#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
-
-#include <linux/filter.h>
-#include <linux/types.h>
-
-#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
-
-/*
- * Stackframe layout (packed stack):
- *
- *				    ^ high
- *	      +---------------+     |
- *	      | old backchain |     |
- *	      +---------------+     |
- *	      |   r15 - r6    |     |
- *	      +---------------+     |
- *	      | 4 byte align  |     |
- *	      | tail_call_cnt |     |
- * BFP	   -> +===============+     |
- *	      |		      |     |
- *	      |   BPF stack   |     |
- *	      |		      |     |
- * R15+160 -> +---------------+     |
- *	      | new backchain |     |
- * R15+152 -> +---------------+     |
- *	      | + 152 byte SA |     |
- * R15	   -> +---------------+     + low
- *
- * We get 160 bytes stack space from calling function, but only use
- * 12 * 8 byte for old backchain, r15..r6, and tail_call_cnt.
- *
- * The stack size used by the BPF program ("BPF stack" above) is passed
- * via "aux->stack_depth".
- */
-#define STK_SPACE_ADD	(160)
-#define STK_160_UNUSED	(160 - 12 * 8)
-#define STK_OFF		(STK_SPACE_ADD - STK_160_UNUSED)
-
-#define STK_OFF_R6	(160 - 11 * 8)	/* Offset of r6 on stack */
-#define STK_OFF_TCCNT	(160 - 12 * 8)	/* Offset of tail_call_cnt on stack */
-
-#endif /* __ARCH_S390_NET_BPF_JIT_H */
diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 12fda05aadf61..7907c3f9b59ab 100644
--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
 #include <asm/set_memory.h>
 #include <asm/text-patching.h>
 #include <asm/unwind.h>
-#include "bpf_jit.h"
 
 struct bpf_jit {
 	u32 seen;		/* Flags to remember seen eBPF instructions */
@@ -56,7 +55,7 @@ struct bpf_jit {
 	int prologue_plt;	/* Start of prologue hotpatch PLT */
 	int kern_arena;		/* Pool offset of kernel arena address */
 	u64 user_arena;		/* User arena address */
-	u32 frame_off;		/* Offset of frame from %r15 */
+	u32 frame_off;		/* Offset of struct bpf_prog from %r15 */
 };
 
 #define SEEN_MEM	BIT(0)		/* use mem[] for temporary storage */
@@ -404,12 +403,26 @@ static void jit_fill_hole(void *area, unsigned int size)
 	memset(area, 0, size);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Caller-allocated part of the frame.
+ * Thanks to packed stack, its otherwise unused initial part can be used for
+ * the BPF stack and for the next frame.
+ */
+struct prog_frame {
+	u64 unused[8];
+	/* BPF stack starts here and grows towards 0 */
+	u32 tail_call_cnt;
+	u32 pad;
+	u64 r6[10];  /* r6 - r15 */
+	u64 backchain;
+} __packed;
+
 /*
  * Save registers from "rs" (register start) to "re" (register end) on stack
  */
 static void save_regs(struct bpf_jit *jit, u32 rs, u32 re)
 {
-	u32 off = STK_OFF_R6 + (rs - 6) * 8;
+	u32 off = offsetof(struct prog_frame, r6) + (rs - 6) * 8;
 
 	if (rs == re)
 		/* stg %rs,off(%r15) */
@@ -424,7 +437,7 @@ static void save_regs(struct bpf_jit *jit, u32 rs, u32 re)
  */
 static void restore_regs(struct bpf_jit *jit, u32 rs, u32 re)
 {
-	u32 off = jit->frame_off + STK_OFF_R6 + (rs - 6) * 8;
+	u32 off = jit->frame_off + offsetof(struct prog_frame, r6) + (rs - 6) * 8;
 
 	if (rs == re)
 		/* lg %rs,off(%r15) */
@@ -556,10 +569,12 @@ static void bpf_jit_plt(struct bpf_plt *plt, void *ret, void *target)
  * Emit function prologue
  *
  * Save registers and create stack frame if necessary.
- * See stack frame layout description in "bpf_jit.h"!
+ * Stack frame layout is described by struct prog_frame.
  */
 static void bpf_jit_prologue(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp)
 {
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct prog_frame) != STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD);
+
 	/* No-op for hotpatching */
 	/* brcl 0,prologue_plt */
 	EMIT6_PCREL_RILC(0xc0040000, 0, jit->prologue_plt);
@@ -567,8 +582,9 @@ static void bpf_jit_prologue(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp)
 
 	if (!bpf_is_subprog(fp)) {
 		/* Initialize the tail call counter in the main program. */
-		/* xc STK_OFF_TCCNT(4,%r15),STK_OFF_TCCNT(%r15) */
-		_EMIT6(0xd703f000 | STK_OFF_TCCNT, 0xf000 | STK_OFF_TCCNT);
+		/* xc tail_call_cnt(4,%r15),tail_call_cnt(%r15) */
+		_EMIT6(0xd703f000 | offsetof(struct prog_frame, tail_call_cnt),
+		       0xf000 | offsetof(struct prog_frame, tail_call_cnt));
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * Skip the tail call counter initialization in subprograms.
@@ -611,13 +627,15 @@ static void bpf_jit_prologue(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp)
 	if (is_first_pass(jit) || (jit->seen & SEEN_STACK)) {
 		/* lgr %w1,%r15 (backchain) */
 		EMIT4(0xb9040000, REG_W1, REG_15);
-		/* la %bfp,STK_160_UNUSED(%r15) (BPF frame pointer) */
-		EMIT4_DISP(0x41000000, BPF_REG_FP, REG_15, STK_160_UNUSED);
+		/* la %bfp,unused_end(%r15) (BPF frame pointer) */
+		EMIT4_DISP(0x41000000, BPF_REG_FP, REG_15,
+			   offsetofend(struct prog_frame, unused));
 		/* aghi %r15,-frame_off */
 		EMIT4_IMM(0xa70b0000, REG_15, -jit->frame_off);
-		/* stg %w1,152(%r15) (backchain) */
+		/* stg %w1,backchain(%r15) */
 		EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0024, REG_W1, REG_0,
-			      REG_15, 152);
+			      REG_15,
+			      offsetof(struct prog_frame, backchain));
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1779,9 +1797,10 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
 		 * Note 2: We assume that the verifier does not let us call the
 		 * main program, which clears the tail call counter on entry.
 		 */
-		/* mvc STK_OFF_TCCNT(4,%r15),frame_off+STK_OFF_TCCNT(%r15) */
-		_EMIT6(0xd203f000 | STK_OFF_TCCNT,
-		       0xf000 | (jit->frame_off + STK_OFF_TCCNT));
+		/* mvc tail_call_cnt(4,%r15),frame_off+tail_call_cnt(%r15) */
+		_EMIT6(0xd203f000 | offsetof(struct prog_frame, tail_call_cnt),
+		       0xf000 | (jit->frame_off +
+				 offsetof(struct prog_frame, tail_call_cnt)));
 
 		/* Sign-extend the kfunc arguments. */
 		if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL) {
@@ -1832,7 +1851,8 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
 		 *         goto out;
 		 */
 
-		off = jit->frame_off + STK_OFF_TCCNT;
+		off = jit->frame_off +
+		      offsetof(struct prog_frame, tail_call_cnt);
 		/* lhi %w0,1 */
 		EMIT4_IMM(0xa7080000, REG_W0, 1);
 		/* laal %w1,%w0,off(%r15) */
@@ -2164,7 +2184,9 @@ static int bpf_jit_prog(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
 	jit->prg = 0;
 	jit->excnt = 0;
 	if (is_first_pass(jit) || (jit->seen & SEEN_STACK))
-		jit->frame_off = STK_OFF + round_up(fp->aux->stack_depth, 8);
+		jit->frame_off = sizeof(struct prog_frame) -
+				 offsetofend(struct prog_frame, unused) +
+				 round_up(fp->aux->stack_depth, 8);
 	else
 		jit->frame_off = 0;
 
@@ -2647,9 +2669,10 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	/* stg %r1,backchain_off(%r15) */
 	EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0024, REG_1, REG_0, REG_15,
 		      tjit->backchain_off);
-	/* mvc tccnt_off(4,%r15),stack_size+STK_OFF_TCCNT(%r15) */
+	/* mvc tccnt_off(4,%r15),stack_size+tail_call_cnt(%r15) */
 	_EMIT6(0xd203f000 | tjit->tccnt_off,
-	       0xf000 | (tjit->stack_size + STK_OFF_TCCNT));
+	       0xf000 | (tjit->stack_size +
+			 offsetof(struct prog_frame, tail_call_cnt)));
 	/* stmg %r2,%rN,fwd_reg_args_off(%r15) */
 	if (nr_reg_args)
 		EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xeb000000, 0x0024, REG_2,
@@ -2786,8 +2809,9 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 				       (nr_stack_args * sizeof(u64) - 1) << 16 |
 				       tjit->stack_args_off,
 			       0xf000 | tjit->orig_stack_args_off);
-		/* mvc STK_OFF_TCCNT(4,%r15),tccnt_off(%r15) */
-		_EMIT6(0xd203f000 | STK_OFF_TCCNT, 0xf000 | tjit->tccnt_off);
+		/* mvc tail_call_cnt(4,%r15),tccnt_off(%r15) */
+		_EMIT6(0xd203f000 | offsetof(struct prog_frame, tail_call_cnt),
+		       0xf000 | tjit->tccnt_off);
 		/* lgr %r1,%r8 */
 		EMIT4(0xb9040000, REG_1, REG_8);
 		/* %r1() */
@@ -2844,8 +2868,9 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	if (flags & (BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG | BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET))
 		EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0004, REG_2, REG_0, REG_15,
 			      tjit->retval_off);
-	/* mvc stack_size+STK_OFF_TCCNT(4,%r15),tccnt_off(%r15) */
-	_EMIT6(0xd203f000 | (tjit->stack_size + STK_OFF_TCCNT),
+	/* mvc stack_size+tail_call_cnt(4,%r15),tccnt_off(%r15) */
+	_EMIT6(0xd203f000 | (tjit->stack_size +
+			     offsetof(struct prog_frame, tail_call_cnt)),
 	       0xf000 | tjit->tccnt_off);
 	/* aghi %r15,stack_size */
 	EMIT4_IMM(0xa70b0000, REG_15, tjit->stack_size);
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-17  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-17  9:19 [PATCH 6.12.y 0/4] s390/bpf: Tail call counter fixes Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-10-17  9:19 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/4] s390/bpf: Centralize frame offset calculations Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-10-17  9:19 ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2025-10-17  9:19 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 3/4] s390/bpf: Write back tail call counter for BPF_PSEUDO_CALL Ilya Leoshkevich
2025-10-17  9:19 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 4/4] s390/bpf: Write back tail call counter for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG Ilya Leoshkevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251017092550.88640-3-iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox