[PATCH 6.12.y] padata: Reset next CPU when reorder sequence wraps around

[Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>]

From: Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 501302d5cee0d8e8ec2c4a5919c37e0df9abc99b ]

When seq_nr wraps around, the next reorder job with seq 0 is hashed to
the first CPU in padata_do_serial(). Correspondingly, need reset pd->cpu
to the first one when pd->processed wraps around. Otherwise, if the
number of used CPUs is not a power of 2, padata_find_next() will be
checking a wrong list, hence deadlock.

Fixes: 6fc4dbcf0276 ("padata: Replace delayed timer with immediate workqueue in padata_reorder")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
[ relocated fix to padata_find_next() using pd->processed and pd->cpu structure fields ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/padata.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/padata.c b/kernel/padata.c
index 3e0ef0753e73e..c3810f5bd7156 100644
--- a/kernel/padata.c
+++ b/kernel/padata.c
@@ -290,7 +290,11 @@ static struct padata_priv *padata_find_next(struct parallel_data *pd,
 	if (remove_object) {
 		list_del_init(&padata->list);
 		++pd->processed;
-		pd->cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, pd->cpumask.pcpu, -1, false);
+		/* When sequence wraps around, reset to the first CPU. */
+		if (unlikely(pd->processed == 0))
+			pd->cpu = cpumask_first(pd->cpumask.pcpu);
+		else
+			pd->cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, pd->cpumask.pcpu, -1, false);
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&reorder->lock);
-- 
2.51.0