From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3881E350A39; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 19:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761076581; cv=none; b=S2h463ImvdIASABuW2IOoMHezT/EHUnTK8/Nu9QG9OhX2a5rRof+YAcBD/kJZ2AOQQkmhpudIH/z4O83E4OuuYLUeKp8NbnngPoYUEvBsGCquD3/BiR77iyz/JhjLh6msxSfSRgXeX6DnqsxcoI0IdAuGvYDW5aXMiiGsUsOuNM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761076581; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0dB62Ns56rxduhCNVD/tH3XdpjVxapTFHXMzwxcpR0E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=cSdk+JxYua8c/bmM/UO5lZ2MjnYsDNhTTLOlieB3zM8tksONeQL8YCn/FsJEY766DPWnWvHwnByaEv9OQNMz6p7jC+/9qs7bM2GQScUwo5F234iJeztwNZwlTgrF4214nqAo0hgFfiVDe8As3V6ON26H/zWwcc+5hmkCWhYgGgM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=KSc9nV92; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="KSc9nV92" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 973E5C4CEF1; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 19:56:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1761076581; bh=0dB62Ns56rxduhCNVD/tH3XdpjVxapTFHXMzwxcpR0E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KSc9nV92w/tOEb0DJjEwRcUz7idGSRceaUpGWgL027jL/BvXBbkzLf4mONSRPfV8b ZWnRpyzv8XIRFhx7k2uhALHtjqXTe4n1fc0T7ZrJb+hAU6BGE5P35vDBU4l9Q4sv9j OyTKVofoIGtI79cUdj95ux2VWzdIDk4ZoMiTZTAk= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , Carlos Maiolino , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.6 079/105] xfs: rename the old_crc variable in xlog_recover_process Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 21:51:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20251021195023.527664682@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.1 In-Reply-To: <20251021195021.492915002@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20251021195021.492915002@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Christoph Hellwig [ Upstream commit 0b737f4ac1d3ec093347241df74bbf5f54a7e16c ] old_crc is a very misleading name. Rename it to expected_crc as that described the usage much better. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino Stable-dep-of: e747883c7d73 ("xfs: fix log CRC mismatches between i386 and other architectures") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 17 ++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c @@ -2860,20 +2860,19 @@ xlog_recover_process( int pass, struct list_head *buffer_list) { - __le32 old_crc = rhead->h_crc; - __le32 crc; + __le32 expected_crc = rhead->h_crc, crc; crc = xlog_cksum(log, rhead, dp, be32_to_cpu(rhead->h_len)); /* * Nothing else to do if this is a CRC verification pass. Just return * if this a record with a non-zero crc. Unfortunately, mkfs always - * sets old_crc to 0 so we must consider this valid even on v5 supers. - * Otherwise, return EFSBADCRC on failure so the callers up the stack - * know precisely what failed. + * sets expected_crc to 0 so we must consider this valid even on v5 + * supers. Otherwise, return EFSBADCRC on failure so the callers up the + * stack know precisely what failed. */ if (pass == XLOG_RECOVER_CRCPASS) { - if (old_crc && crc != old_crc) + if (expected_crc && crc != expected_crc) return -EFSBADCRC; return 0; } @@ -2884,11 +2883,11 @@ xlog_recover_process( * zero CRC check prevents warnings from being emitted when upgrading * the kernel from one that does not add CRCs by default. */ - if (crc != old_crc) { - if (old_crc || xfs_has_crc(log->l_mp)) { + if (crc != expected_crc) { + if (expected_crc || xfs_has_crc(log->l_mp)) { xfs_alert(log->l_mp, "log record CRC mismatch: found 0x%x, expected 0x%x.", - le32_to_cpu(old_crc), + le32_to_cpu(expected_crc), le32_to_cpu(crc)); xfs_hex_dump(dp, 32); }