From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Luben Tuikov" <ltuikov89@gmail.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Philipp Stanner" <pstanner@redhat.com>,
"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 1/3] drm/sched: Optimise drm_sched_entity_push_job
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 07:44:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251103124450.4002293-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025110342-exhume-mankind-5952@gregkh>
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
[ Upstream commit d42a254633c773921884a19e8a1a0f53a31150c3 ]
In FIFO mode (which is the default), both drm_sched_entity_push_job() and
drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(), where the latter calls the former, are
currently taking and releasing the same entity->rq_lock.
We can avoid that design inelegance, and also have a miniscule
efficiency improvement on the submit from idle path, by introducing a new
drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked() helper and pulling up the lock taking to
its callers.
v2:
* Remove drm_sched_rq_update_fifo() altogether. (Christian)
v3:
* Improved commit message. (Philipp)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241016122013.7857-2-tursulin@igalia.com
Stable-dep-of: d25e3a610bae ("drm/sched: Fix race in drm_sched_entity_select_rq()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 13 +++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 6 +++---
include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
index 3e75fc1f66072..9dbae7b08bc90 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
@@ -505,8 +505,12 @@ struct drm_sched_job *drm_sched_entity_pop_job(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
struct drm_sched_job *next;
next = to_drm_sched_job(spsc_queue_peek(&entity->job_queue));
- if (next)
- drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(entity, next->submit_ts);
+ if (next) {
+ spin_lock(&entity->rq_lock);
+ drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(entity,
+ next->submit_ts);
+ spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
+ }
}
/* Jobs and entities might have different lifecycles. Since we're
@@ -606,10 +610,11 @@ void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job)
sched = rq->sched;
drm_sched_rq_add_entity(rq, entity);
- spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
if (drm_sched_policy == DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO)
- drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(entity, submit_ts);
+ drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(entity, submit_ts);
+
+ spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
drm_sched_wakeup(sched);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
index d5260cb1ed0ec..0b7976c908dde 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
@@ -169,14 +169,15 @@ static inline void drm_sched_rq_remove_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *enti
}
}
-void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts)
+void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts)
{
/*
* Both locks need to be grabbed, one to protect from entity->rq change
* for entity from within concurrent drm_sched_entity_select_rq and the
* other to update the rb tree structure.
*/
- spin_lock(&entity->rq_lock);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&entity->rq_lock);
+
spin_lock(&entity->rq->lock);
drm_sched_rq_remove_fifo_locked(entity);
@@ -187,7 +188,6 @@ void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts)
drm_sched_entity_compare_before);
spin_unlock(&entity->rq->lock);
- spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
}
/**
diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
index 9c437a057e5de..346a3c261b437 100644
--- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
+++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ void drm_sched_rq_add_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
void drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
struct drm_sched_entity *entity);
-void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts);
+void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts);
int drm_sched_entity_init(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
enum drm_sched_priority priority,
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-03 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-03 0:50 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/sched: Fix race in drm_sched_entity_select_rq()" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-11-03 12:44 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-11-03 12:44 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/3] drm/sched: Re-group and rename the entity run-queue lock Sasha Levin
2025-11-03 12:44 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 3/3] drm/sched: Fix race in drm_sched_entity_select_rq() Sasha Levin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-22 13:09 [PATCH 6.12.y 1/3] drm/sched: Optimise drm_sched_entity_push_job Jules Maselbas
2025-09-22 15:30 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-09-22 17:39 ` Christian König
2025-09-22 20:50 ` Jules Maselbas
2025-09-23 12:08 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-09-23 12:33 ` Christian König
2025-09-23 13:10 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-09-23 13:18 ` Christian König
2025-09-24 11:00 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-24 12:22 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251103124450.4002293-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=ltuikov89@gmail.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=pstanner@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox