public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Luben Tuikov" <ltuikov89@gmail.com>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Philipp Stanner" <pstanner@redhat.com>,
	"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 1/3] drm/sched: Optimise drm_sched_entity_push_job
Date: Mon,  3 Nov 2025 07:44:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251103124450.4002293-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025110342-exhume-mankind-5952@gregkh>

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>

[ Upstream commit d42a254633c773921884a19e8a1a0f53a31150c3 ]

In FIFO mode (which is the default), both drm_sched_entity_push_job() and
drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(), where the latter calls the former, are
currently taking and releasing the same entity->rq_lock.

We can avoid that design inelegance, and also have a miniscule
efficiency improvement on the submit from idle path, by introducing a new
drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked() helper and pulling up the lock taking to
its callers.

v2:
 * Remove drm_sched_rq_update_fifo() altogether. (Christian)

v3:
 * Improved commit message. (Philipp)

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241016122013.7857-2-tursulin@igalia.com
Stable-dep-of: d25e3a610bae ("drm/sched: Fix race in drm_sched_entity_select_rq()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 13 +++++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c   |  6 +++---
 include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h              |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
index 3e75fc1f66072..9dbae7b08bc90 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
@@ -505,8 +505,12 @@ struct drm_sched_job *drm_sched_entity_pop_job(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
 		struct drm_sched_job *next;
 
 		next = to_drm_sched_job(spsc_queue_peek(&entity->job_queue));
-		if (next)
-			drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(entity, next->submit_ts);
+		if (next) {
+			spin_lock(&entity->rq_lock);
+			drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(entity,
+							next->submit_ts);
+			spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* Jobs and entities might have different lifecycles. Since we're
@@ -606,10 +610,11 @@ void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job)
 		sched = rq->sched;
 
 		drm_sched_rq_add_entity(rq, entity);
-		spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
 
 		if (drm_sched_policy == DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO)
-			drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(entity, submit_ts);
+			drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(entity, submit_ts);
+
+		spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
 
 		drm_sched_wakeup(sched);
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
index d5260cb1ed0ec..0b7976c908dde 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
@@ -169,14 +169,15 @@ static inline void drm_sched_rq_remove_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *enti
 	}
 }
 
-void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts)
+void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Both locks need to be grabbed, one to protect from entity->rq change
 	 * for entity from within concurrent drm_sched_entity_select_rq and the
 	 * other to update the rb tree structure.
 	 */
-	spin_lock(&entity->rq_lock);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&entity->rq_lock);
+
 	spin_lock(&entity->rq->lock);
 
 	drm_sched_rq_remove_fifo_locked(entity);
@@ -187,7 +188,6 @@ void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts)
 		      drm_sched_entity_compare_before);
 
 	spin_unlock(&entity->rq->lock);
-	spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
index 9c437a057e5de..346a3c261b437 100644
--- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
+++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ void drm_sched_rq_add_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
 void drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
 				struct drm_sched_entity *entity);
 
-void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts);
+void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts);
 
 int drm_sched_entity_init(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
 			  enum drm_sched_priority priority,
-- 
2.51.0


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-03 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-03  0:50 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/sched: Fix race in drm_sched_entity_select_rq()" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-11-03 12:44 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-11-03 12:44   ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/3] drm/sched: Re-group and rename the entity run-queue lock Sasha Levin
2025-11-03 12:44   ` [PATCH 6.12.y 3/3] drm/sched: Fix race in drm_sched_entity_select_rq() Sasha Levin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-22 13:09 [PATCH 6.12.y 1/3] drm/sched: Optimise drm_sched_entity_push_job Jules Maselbas
2025-09-22 15:30 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-09-22 17:39   ` Christian König
2025-09-22 20:50     ` Jules Maselbas
2025-09-23 12:08       ` Philipp Stanner
2025-09-23 12:33         ` Christian König
2025-09-23 13:10           ` Philipp Stanner
2025-09-23 13:18             ` Christian König
2025-09-24 11:00           ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-24 12:22             ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251103124450.4002293-1-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=ltuikov89@gmail.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=pstanner@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox