From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D837126F0A; Mon, 3 Nov 2025 23:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762213981; cv=none; b=VV3xBNWuWlJ8zo8kieK5A67W4XjhZAenwmgBjpXKZNbhBQJtWz6saSdQ37btDESPZuvToyyg0G9oslu5Tf0n5jOhaDipuZUUr2bQwiIpLAHyVyDS+wAF24+DQkVA2a4WQvO+A/CQgM+iF6exWu1V44AROj1URon7VqOWI+lccTc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762213981; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tGzK9R2ZDq3iZefSxigTk0vifeKf2tE7fUT5zVytAJQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HsOsdF6egBLDxcJwL2iwgYpwZeTLCU8fxZ0fF/c0phxa3PXZfuYf1dSYlc5Sb7LVFGz2gBCt2RXOy8Ujt3Hlntajxprpip5tWiQ9V60shMsgwWkmw2Tu/IJm7ORtb/u67AuBdI59TH3ChsLSxZTnfqjtPDFbG7AeIuu4ylyQJ4U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=G/Vcf6HC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="G/Vcf6HC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 063BCC4CEE7; Mon, 3 Nov 2025 23:52:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1762213980; bh=tGzK9R2ZDq3iZefSxigTk0vifeKf2tE7fUT5zVytAJQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=G/Vcf6HC42/jFWtXxuhcG/54fWnN4AgMX+XM2VuPc2LxTZkS6fIrlX4E2kUI6ufYD EGIKYntR7Le9M20XLK09yZCayV0pneBY7cxYK/buDPaFZthyavMkaMOBnCihhWcM6g L+p6ciKfo2Wp73Sz19YcuqFunWR8EKt1pkedZDs8= Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 08:52:57 +0900 From: Greg KH To: Matthieu Baerts Cc: kuba@kernel.org, martineau@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, sashal@kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, MPTCP Linux , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Patch "mptcp: move the whole rx path under msk socket lock protection" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree Message-ID: <2025110444-rendering-exhale-0bd8@gregkh> References: <2025110351-praising-bounce-a06b@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 08:13:30PM +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Greg, Sasha, > > On 03/11/2025 02:29, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > mptcp: move the whole rx path under msk socket lock protection > > > > to the 6.12-stable tree which can be found at: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > mptcp-move-the-whole-rx-path-under-msk-socket-lock-protection.patch > > and it can be found in the queue-6.12 subdirectory. > > Thank you for the backport! > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > > please let know about it. > > Please drop this patch from the 6.12-stable tree: it causes troubles in > the MPTCP selftests: MPTCP to TCP connections timeout when MSG_PEEK is > used. Likely a dependence is missing, and it might be better to keep > only the last patch, and resolve conflicts. I will check that ASAP. > > In the meantime, can you then drop this patch and the ones that are > linked to it please? > > queue-6.12/mptcp-cleanup-mem-accounting.patch > queue-6.12/mptcp-fix-msg_peek-stream-corruption.patch > queue-6.12/mptcp-move-the-whole-rx-path-under-msk-socket-lock-protection.patch > queue-6.12/mptcp-leverage-skb-deferral-free.patch all now dropped, thanks. greg k-h