public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v10 2/5] NFSD: Make FILE_SYNC WRITEs comply with spec
       [not found] <20251105192806.77093-1-cel@kernel.org>
@ 2025-11-05 19:28 ` Chuck Lever
  2025-11-06  0:55   ` NeilBrown
  2025-11-06 13:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2025-11-05 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: NeilBrown, Jeff Layton, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey
  Cc: linux-nfs, Chuck Lever, Mike Snitzer, stable

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>

Mike noted that when NFSD responds to an NFS_FILE_SYNC WRITE, it
does not also persist file time stamps. To wit, Section 18.32.3
of RFC 8881 mandates:

> The client specifies with the stable parameter the method of how
> the data is to be processed by the server. If stable is
> FILE_SYNC4, the server MUST commit the data written plus all file
> system metadata to stable storage before returning results. This
> corresponds to the NFSv2 protocol semantics. Any other behavior
> constitutes a protocol violation. If stable is DATA_SYNC4, then
> the server MUST commit all of the data to stable storage and
> enough of the metadata to retrieve the data before returning.

Commit 3f3503adb332 ("NFSD: Use vfs_iocb_iter_write()") replaced:

-		flags |= RWF_SYNC;

with:

+		kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC;

which appears to be correct given:

	if (flags & RWF_SYNC)
		kiocb_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC;

in kiocb_set_rw_flags(). However the author of that commit did not
appreciate that the previous line in kiocb_set_rw_flags() results
in IOCB_SYNC also being set:

	kiocb_flags |= (__force int) (flags & RWF_SUPPORTED);

RWF_SUPPORTED contains RWF_SYNC, and RWF_SYNC is the same bit as
IOCB_SYNC. Reviewers at the time did not catch the omission.

Reported-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20251018005431.3403-1-cel@kernel.org/T/#t
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Fixes: 3f3503adb332 ("NFSD: Use vfs_iocb_iter_write()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
index f537a7b4ee01..5333d49910d9 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
@@ -1314,8 +1314,18 @@ nfsd_vfs_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
 		stable = NFS_UNSTABLE;
 	init_sync_kiocb(&kiocb, file);
 	kiocb.ki_pos = offset;
-	if (stable && !fhp->fh_use_wgather)
-		kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC;
+	if (likely(!fhp->fh_use_wgather)) {
+		switch (stable) {
+		case NFS_FILE_SYNC:
+			/* persist data and timestamps */
+			kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC | IOCB_SYNC;
+			break;
+		case NFS_DATA_SYNC:
+			/* persist data only */
+			kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
 
 	nvecs = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec, rqstp->rq_maxpages, payload);
 	iov_iter_bvec(&iter, ITER_SOURCE, rqstp->rq_bvec, nvecs, *cnt);
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 2/5] NFSD: Make FILE_SYNC WRITEs comply with spec
  2025-11-05 19:28 ` [PATCH v10 2/5] NFSD: Make FILE_SYNC WRITEs comply with spec Chuck Lever
@ 2025-11-06  0:55   ` NeilBrown
  2025-11-06 13:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2025-11-06  0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chuck Lever
  Cc: Jeff Layton, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey, linux-nfs,
	Chuck Lever, Mike Snitzer, stable

On Thu, 06 Nov 2025, Chuck Lever wrote:
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> 
> Mike noted that when NFSD responds to an NFS_FILE_SYNC WRITE, it
> does not also persist file time stamps. To wit, Section 18.32.3
> of RFC 8881 mandates:
> 
> > The client specifies with the stable parameter the method of how
> > the data is to be processed by the server. If stable is
> > FILE_SYNC4, the server MUST commit the data written plus all file
> > system metadata to stable storage before returning results. This
> > corresponds to the NFSv2 protocol semantics. Any other behavior
> > constitutes a protocol violation. If stable is DATA_SYNC4, then
> > the server MUST commit all of the data to stable storage and
> > enough of the metadata to retrieve the data before returning.
> 
> Commit 3f3503adb332 ("NFSD: Use vfs_iocb_iter_write()") replaced:
> 
> -		flags |= RWF_SYNC;
> 
> with:
> 
> +		kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC;
> 
> which appears to be correct given:
> 
> 	if (flags & RWF_SYNC)
> 		kiocb_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC;
> 
> in kiocb_set_rw_flags(). However the author of that commit did not

"the author and reviewers of that commit"

Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>

Thanks,
NeilBrown


> appreciate that the previous line in kiocb_set_rw_flags() results
> in IOCB_SYNC also being set:
> 
> 	kiocb_flags |= (__force int) (flags & RWF_SUPPORTED);
> 
> RWF_SUPPORTED contains RWF_SYNC, and RWF_SYNC is the same bit as
> IOCB_SYNC. Reviewers at the time did not catch the omission.
> 
> Reported-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20251018005431.3403-1-cel@kernel.org/T/#t
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> Fixes: 3f3503adb332 ("NFSD: Use vfs_iocb_iter_write()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index f537a7b4ee01..5333d49910d9 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -1314,8 +1314,18 @@ nfsd_vfs_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
>  		stable = NFS_UNSTABLE;
>  	init_sync_kiocb(&kiocb, file);
>  	kiocb.ki_pos = offset;
> -	if (stable && !fhp->fh_use_wgather)
> -		kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC;
> +	if (likely(!fhp->fh_use_wgather)) {
> +		switch (stable) {
> +		case NFS_FILE_SYNC:
> +			/* persist data and timestamps */
> +			kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC | IOCB_SYNC;
> +			break;
> +		case NFS_DATA_SYNC:
> +			/* persist data only */
> +			kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	nvecs = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec, rqstp->rq_maxpages, payload);
>  	iov_iter_bvec(&iter, ITER_SOURCE, rqstp->rq_bvec, nvecs, *cnt);
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 2/5] NFSD: Make FILE_SYNC WRITEs comply with spec
  2025-11-05 19:28 ` [PATCH v10 2/5] NFSD: Make FILE_SYNC WRITEs comply with spec Chuck Lever
  2025-11-06  0:55   ` NeilBrown
@ 2025-11-06 13:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2025-11-06 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chuck Lever
  Cc: NeilBrown, Jeff Layton, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey,
	linux-nfs, Chuck Lever, Mike Snitzer, stable

Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-06 13:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20251105192806.77093-1-cel@kernel.org>
2025-11-05 19:28 ` [PATCH v10 2/5] NFSD: Make FILE_SYNC WRITEs comply with spec Chuck Lever
2025-11-06  0:55   ` NeilBrown
2025-11-06 13:05   ` Christoph Hellwig

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox