From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com (mail-wr1-f45.google.com [209.85.221.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC25631BCBD for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 11:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.45 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762515810; cv=none; b=Z0Nm0/30fwxw/IlUJwMmmSJZyRtHw/WAHwk7gKGVaYdBUQFIxdJKH1IcijNwNXNU4tyzBq0/PqWZLuss/LEVDmbVNHXlZcfWAU25o9XtoApqCCBMBBsocLEar3ysSlzqkOeeDPVm7IjP9Fugr5S2GCE/ZwSQ8v3VDyVDK2wip14= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762515810; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AmjUPrWpuTwthWsVlqGLH9DR6E98FBF6NayNRYjqv5c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Xg6GNqkRrxpTJqGKJQRRfYrktuSugPpB5Y/9HUBwsWa71+9HmxSZa4md4WBjb5jgoLLyvX4JxiX1uB9PJ5is0H8u7Mtlv9/PL+XoKWVdyvI9ZHvcBbmbw+jNLv/j2xCNOvnFSrBgRFTZPuv/MbaLYwYLdvau/AiTrbO3KcUlOwI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=mSkktNqi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.45 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="mSkktNqi" Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-429c7e438a8so601306f8f.2 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2025 03:43:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1762515807; x=1763120607; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=nqzN7knDGH9QbbVJwM6bluXyesO87eP1mjfXDHBEKqY=; b=mSkktNqio9IcoHCXxwbligTDrRPU3DT6gRpEjQ+4Rud8/53kDBSYVQuxS/HIwfsFrx Yj+u3saj9StcPn8deML3Y4k99XQEZDca9E03kjQQd6+XRbYrVE0YSk5spjPKgbdloxYC Hz1GyQztA+riEwsvDjf8qYK/VwsJ1jRPrUbTCkftdicHCuG8B8k2iZvbPD5zpHKvdzNF kJ7w1FeqBlo6hm8U3FO2VATsRGTxfJBVb7elygi73NUHMDdJMDNSOU5WJPLWLmUgDFhY 0cOM++qHNdJlDCvKqhWkotHTaFBUtaHOND/QXwzy7mXPD33PZPd27EfcuCx4Ty5kG9KR ebCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762515807; x=1763120607; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nqzN7knDGH9QbbVJwM6bluXyesO87eP1mjfXDHBEKqY=; b=JR7tDDX5RSJsELsJBDXrhRzUmN7xxLANIPCGqj1Wmh3C/bkbr+TbAq/DRWBIhf5xhY 7ubrIjnsoRGU6/pGeQ42cakyc7TvWrTFLiQCS3Hhp+FPkKNxhM29cBFYz++1DoLYB3+F GCPqU66tGvKPUSmRpKNNhy7mhVHbuT5+gguatGE/yEB2GM6G0Ow8E7V1TgJsIqVqfc5c nX81PMxIYVqtIjH6379CduSyozsdIEiMlJ9Jr/ecuBNH7QxJfbiWy1LL1cOnWuT514Eb z3fxbK7VwfM8Da2ecoCEsVvUMUzHhbRvVZVM6p800zJt0xIZPr1DaaQjRLVoA2g2aiEm sXZA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVKnk1clXrZ3/t97mMcOnvTfdnmFMTeCJSvXmfAR+aVKxbpiuQC02lcmXJ7i3yX3YpND92Mn0A=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywj1B+bpYlWDTs6WaulFfJ5NzekCvq0uUm24VdRQx0S8IaCMZAx XXM+ODXamF8zVAVIenjkDtcKSbNwb3smbtuYjNpdp77964swGDtElWiT X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsinZMOP30xw5s3sXLVhjYHP4as8A5H0Blx4Zc+2L0gKAaBp+GtdmXTscmGyus yUDYfvSsZryENcJ+8hevbyD0oHvxX9G4m6psjSinfN87zp6wJMK+EkUSRrMYCsoqJy8hECpG1ZJ sbtb16OsDuhbguhvQ02+s6FRIQlP1jzzcMv6hXo1iJ8Kkk6DzG1Y4dlkXMLcqd85ke8Lh+F4JGF EVbnf4/HXaQKAJUM4OI7rDedKfzAUg88XY4IhzS1VUFA8N9tp/KrAh8YT6qpnBSGp+8JBQ8czAK MfB+hRbXYF5/rLQE/vNesRwtX9z6WKcQUWsSbIDgGePPC6kaXkrwJVI0uvkNJzgohqgJq0tFgAQ G6QKePoRcoKyBjLkaltZmi3il10peWPNr/wyjGXOL2BVNK/0chtzfa/UY0hr1qX9xQzKnBWm+WD Ciw1bZjjBHzDjCsL8YUfBALJ2dlI8RJfcBRbrZ0k6JTA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHw1xLInjNvQyJ+t0Q049pOhGmFx6agirkk01rOnXi/dnaEiyF9VIdrFsbRc2ZzQtwnJmDSoA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5d0c:0:b0:429:d6b7:6b9b with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-42ae5af7ff7mr2595204f8f.62.1762515806681; Fri, 07 Nov 2025 03:43:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pumpkin (82-69-66-36.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.66.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-42abe64fd90sm4714454f8f.21.2025.11.07.03.43.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 Nov 2025 03:43:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 11:43:24 +0000 From: David Laight To: NeilBrown Cc: NeilBrown , "Chuck Lever" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "Andrew Morton" , "David Laight" , "Linux NFS Mailing List" , "Linux List Kernel Mailing" , speedcracker@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Compile Error fs/nfsd/nfs4state.o - clamp() low limit slotsize greater than high limit total_avail/scale_factor Message-ID: <20251107114324.33fd69f3@pumpkin> In-Reply-To: <176251424056.634289.13464296772500147856@noble.neil.brown.name> References: <37bc1037-37d8-4168-afc9-da8e2d1dd26b@kernel.org> <20251106192210.1b6a3ca0@pumpkin> <176251424056.634289.13464296772500147856@noble.neil.brown.name> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 07 Nov 2025 22:17:20 +1100 NeilBrown wrote: > On Fri, 07 Nov 2025, David Laight wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 09:33:28 -0500 > > Chuck Lever wrote: > > > > > FYI > > > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220745 > > > > Ugg - that code is horrid. > > It seems to have got deleted since, but it is: > > > > u32 slotsize = slot_bytes(ca); > > u32 num = ca->maxreqs; > > unsigned long avail, total_avail; > > unsigned int scale_factor; > > > > spin_lock(&nfsd_drc_lock); > > if (nfsd_drc_max_mem > nfsd_drc_mem_used) > > total_avail = nfsd_drc_max_mem - nfsd_drc_mem_used; > > else > > /* We have handed out more space than we chose in > > * set_max_drc() to allow. That isn't really a > > * problem as long as that doesn't make us think we > > * have lots more due to integer overflow. > > */ > > total_avail = 0; > > avail = min((unsigned long)NFSD_MAX_MEM_PER_SESSION, total_avail); > > /* > > * Never use more than a fraction of the remaining memory, > > * unless it's the only way to give this client a slot. > > * The chosen fraction is either 1/8 or 1/number of threads, > > * whichever is smaller. This ensures there are adequate > > * slots to support multiple clients per thread. > > * Give the client one slot even if that would require > > * over-allocation--it is better than failure. > > */ > > scale_factor = max_t(unsigned int, 8, nn->nfsd_serv->sv_nrthreads); > > > > avail = clamp_t(unsigned long, avail, slotsize, > > total_avail/scale_factor); > > num = min_t(int, num, avail / slotsize); > > num = max_t(int, num, 1); > > > > Lets rework it a bit... > > if (nfsd_drc_max_mem > nfsd_drc_mem_used) { > > total_avail = nfsd_drc_max_mem - nfsd_drc_mem_used; > > avail = min(NFSD_MAX_MEM_PER_SESSION, total_avail); > > avail = clamp(avail, n + sizeof(xxx), total_avail/8) > > } else { > > total_avail = 0; > > avail = 0; > > avail = clamp(0, n + sizeof(xxx), 0); > > } > > > > Neither of those clamp() are sane at all - should be clamp(val, lo, hi) > > with 'lo <= hi' otherwise the result is dependant on the order of the > > comparisons. > > The compiler sees the second one and rightly bleats. > > In fact only gcc-9 bleats. That is probably why it didn't get picked up earlier. > gcc-7 gcc-10 gcc-13 gcc-15 > all seem to think it is fine. Which, of course, it isn't... David > > NeilBrown