From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 1/3] KVM: guest_memfd: Pass index, not gfn, to __kvm_gmem_get_pfn()
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 12:36:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251120173631.1905381-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025112009-getaway-overplay-a36a@gregkh>
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
[ Upstream commit 4af18dc6a9204464db76d9771d1f40e2b46bf6ae ]
Refactor guest_memfd usage of __kvm_gmem_get_pfn() to pass the index into
the guest_memfd file instead of the gfn, i.e. resolve the index based on
the slot+gfn in the caller instead of in __kvm_gmem_get_pfn(). This will
allow kvm_gmem_get_pfn() to retrieve and return the specific "struct page",
which requires the index into the folio, without a redoing the index
calculation multiple times (which isn't costly, just hard to follow).
Opportunistically add a kvm_gmem_get_index() helper to make the copy+pasted
code easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20241010182427.1434605-46-seanjc@google.com>
Stable-dep-of: ae431059e75d ("KVM: guest_memfd: Remove bindings on memslot deletion when gmem is dying")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
index bb062d3d24572..73e5db8ef1611 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
@@ -304,6 +304,11 @@ static inline struct file *kvm_gmem_get_file(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
return get_file_active(&slot->gmem.file);
}
+static pgoff_t kvm_gmem_get_index(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
+{
+ return gfn - slot->base_gfn + slot->gmem.pgoff;
+}
+
static struct file_operations kvm_gmem_fops = {
.open = generic_file_open,
.release = kvm_gmem_release,
@@ -553,12 +558,11 @@ void kvm_gmem_unbind(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
}
/* Returns a locked folio on success. */
-static struct folio *
-__kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct file *file, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
- gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t *pfn, bool *is_prepared,
- int *max_order)
+static struct folio *__kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct file *file,
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ pgoff_t index, kvm_pfn_t *pfn,
+ bool *is_prepared, int *max_order)
{
- pgoff_t index = gfn - slot->base_gfn + slot->gmem.pgoff;
struct kvm_gmem *gmem = file->private_data;
struct folio *folio;
@@ -594,6 +598,7 @@ __kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct file *file, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t *pfn, int *max_order)
{
+ pgoff_t index = kvm_gmem_get_index(slot, gfn);
struct file *file = kvm_gmem_get_file(slot);
struct folio *folio;
bool is_prepared = false;
@@ -602,7 +607,7 @@ int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
if (!file)
return -EFAULT;
- folio = __kvm_gmem_get_pfn(file, slot, gfn, pfn, &is_prepared, max_order);
+ folio = __kvm_gmem_get_pfn(file, slot, index, pfn, &is_prepared, max_order);
if (IS_ERR(folio)) {
r = PTR_ERR(folio);
goto out;
@@ -650,6 +655,7 @@ long kvm_gmem_populate(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start_gfn, void __user *src, long
for (i = 0; i < npages; i += (1 << max_order)) {
struct folio *folio;
gfn_t gfn = start_gfn + i;
+ pgoff_t index = kvm_gmem_get_index(slot, gfn);
bool is_prepared = false;
kvm_pfn_t pfn;
@@ -658,7 +664,7 @@ long kvm_gmem_populate(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start_gfn, void __user *src, long
break;
}
- folio = __kvm_gmem_get_pfn(file, slot, gfn, &pfn, &is_prepared, &max_order);
+ folio = __kvm_gmem_get_pfn(file, slot, index, &pfn, &is_prepared, &max_order);
if (IS_ERR(folio)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(folio);
break;
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 15:50 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: guest_memfd: Remove bindings on memslot deletion when" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-11-20 17:36 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-11-20 17:36 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/3] KVM: guest_memfd: Remove RCU-protected attribute from slot->gmem.file Sasha Levin
2025-11-20 17:36 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 3/3] KVM: guest_memfd: Remove bindings on memslot deletion when gmem is dying Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251120173631.1905381-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox