From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ziy@nvidia.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org,baohua@kernel.org,baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,david@redhat.com,dev.jain@arm.com,jane.chu@oracle.com,kernel@pankajraghav.com,lance.yang@linux.dev,liam.howlett@oracle.com,linmiaohe@huawei.com,lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,mcgrof@kernel.org,nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,npache@redhat.com,richard.weiyang@gmail.com,ryan.roberts@arm.com,stable@vger.kernel.org,willy@infradead.org,yang@os.amperecomputing.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/huge_memory: preserve PG_has_hwpoisoned if a folio is" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:11:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025112056-isolating-punisher-7be9@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.12.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x fa5a061700364bc28ee1cb1095372f8033645dcb
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025112056-isolating-punisher-7be9@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.12.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From fa5a061700364bc28ee1cb1095372f8033645dcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 23:05:21 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: preserve PG_has_hwpoisoned if a folio is
split to >0 order
folio split clears PG_has_hwpoisoned, but the flag should be preserved in
after-split folios containing pages with PG_hwpoisoned flag if the folio
is split to >0 order folios. Scan all pages in a to-be-split folio to
determine which after-split folios need the flag.
An alternatives is to change PG_has_hwpoisoned to PG_maybe_hwpoisoned to
avoid the scan and set it on all after-split folios, but resulting false
positive has undesirable negative impact. To remove false positive,
caller of folio_test_has_hwpoisoned() and folio_contain_hwpoisoned_page()
needs to do the scan. That might be causing a hassle for current and
future callers and more costly than doing the scan in the split code.
More details are discussed in [1].
This issue can be exposed via:
1. splitting a has_hwpoisoned folio to >0 order from debugfs interface;
2. truncating part of a has_hwpoisoned folio in
truncate_inode_partial_folio().
And later accesses to a hwpoisoned page could be possible due to the
missing has_hwpoisoned folio flag. This will lead to MCE errors.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHbLzkoOZm0PXxE9qwtF4gKR=cpRXrSrJ9V9Pm2DJexs985q4g@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251023030521.473097-1-ziy@nvidia.com
Fixes: c010d47f107f ("mm: thp: split huge page to any lower order pages")
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Pankaj Raghav <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberalin <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Cc: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index feac4aef7dfb..b4ff49d96501 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3263,6 +3263,14 @@ bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int caller_pins, int *pextra_pins)
caller_pins;
}
+static bool page_range_has_hwpoisoned(struct page *page, long nr_pages)
+{
+ for (; nr_pages; page++, nr_pages--)
+ if (PageHWPoison(page))
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* It splits @folio into @new_order folios and copies the @folio metadata to
* all the resulting folios.
@@ -3270,17 +3278,24 @@ bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int caller_pins, int *pextra_pins)
static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
int new_order)
{
+ /* Scan poisoned pages when split a poisoned folio to large folios */
+ const bool handle_hwpoison = folio_test_has_hwpoisoned(folio) && new_order;
long new_nr_pages = 1 << new_order;
long nr_pages = 1 << old_order;
long i;
+ folio_clear_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
+
+ /* Check first new_nr_pages since the loop below skips them */
+ if (handle_hwpoison &&
+ page_range_has_hwpoisoned(folio_page(folio, 0), new_nr_pages))
+ folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
/*
* Skip the first new_nr_pages, since the new folio from them have all
* the flags from the original folio.
*/
for (i = new_nr_pages; i < nr_pages; i += new_nr_pages) {
struct page *new_head = &folio->page + i;
-
/*
* Careful: new_folio is not a "real" folio before we cleared PageTail.
* Don't pass it around before clear_compound_head().
@@ -3322,6 +3337,10 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
(1L << PG_dirty) |
LRU_GEN_MASK | LRU_REFS_MASK));
+ if (handle_hwpoison &&
+ page_range_has_hwpoisoned(new_head, new_nr_pages))
+ folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(new_folio);
+
new_folio->mapping = folio->mapping;
new_folio->index = folio->index + i;
@@ -3422,8 +3441,6 @@ static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
if (folio_test_anon(folio))
mod_mthp_stat(order, MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON, -1);
- folio_clear_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
-
/*
* split to new_order one order at a time. For uniform split,
* folio is split to new_order directly.
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 16:11 gregkh [this message]
2025-11-20 19:46 ` [PATCH 6.12.y] mm/huge_memory: preserve PG_has_hwpoisoned if a folio is split to >0 order Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025112056-isolating-punisher-7be9@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox