From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C067334373 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764256001; cv=none; b=OJBYw4gr1WyVloEk0WSWLNRuiMJvJGhUP4ZEpP7q+fW2HsJDFLJkCeCrgGL4VZKLJXUF2xv9pjybK+W1CpttSXyg03IwT2uSLAQInF5ZgmtY9brE346tQqyVOEoMF+3t6KQzRXY8LGnbYNfUBExMg2ufen6ncmPYu6QDMcs8ha8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764256001; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kqUuQl5N/1WPyTGCD1JuIC5I1IVeqILtr8tIT3hTP4Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bWPbnZqrs7Mee5tYbC4us6R9RwpIbjyl75ZNj9AAjIrSp3ndlHWA6FxB90JCU3AnTIpIqxoJDGhhFo+ZS4/loLsFgms9/+W/Ja58dKpoJY4qvZFOq8oKEUns4PSCbyBsU8YUQ3DijNnPa0xCp3H5wzwP7AABnBZHkJdUa6FUL5Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=GnaJ78fP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="GnaJ78fP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC29BC4CEF8; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:06:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1764256001; bh=kqUuQl5N/1WPyTGCD1JuIC5I1IVeqILtr8tIT3hTP4Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GnaJ78fPcKysW/S3M6xCo3dAvKlqDeM/YdhB2t8319CLbEYa+mATGoF8icUqiU2mh 71OTo/tc0g0l9dreATt//zSxrOFNWgMp7e4b1NvJ49kCnTmFrr4duM0MrqOkfHXLc4 JLGb82AOnfi1vT0Bh4Fpf3MLOuqk0gwygEP2UuRY= Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 16:03:35 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Charles Keepax , stable@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpio: swnode: don't use the swnode's name as the key for GPIO lookup" Message-ID: <2025112726-bovine-snare-3147@gregkh> References: <2025112531-glance-majorette-40b0@gregkh> <2025112505-unlovable-crease-cfe2@gregkh> <2025112757-squash-hesitant-d8d6@gregkh> <2025112721-suggest-truth-bfb4@gregkh> <2025112716-glimpse-deface-db74@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 03:45:29PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 3:17 PM Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 02:10:32PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 03:07:48PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 02:04:48PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 02:51:50PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 12:49:59PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 12:58:30PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 11:48:02AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 12:43:16PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 11:31:56AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 11:29 AM Charles Keepax > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Do we have to wait for the fixes to hit Linus's tree before > > > > > > > pushing them to stable? As they are still in Philipp Zabel's > > > > > > > reset tree at the moment and I would quite like to stem the > > > > > > > rising tide of tickets I am getting about audio breaking on > > > > > > > peoples laptops as soon as possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, we need the fixes there first. > > > > > > > > > > Fair enough, but it is super sad that everyone has to sit around > > > > > with broken devices until after the merge window. This is not a > > > > > theoretical issue people are complaining about this now. > > > > > > > > Are people sitting around with this issue in 6.18-rc releases now? Is > > > > 6.18-final going to be broken in the same way? > > > > > > Yeah regrettably that is going to be broken too, at least until > > > the first stable release either does the same revert or backports > > > the same fixes. > > > > Great, we are "bug compatible!" :) > > > > Seriously, this happens for minor things all the time, not that big of a > > deal normally. > > > > Just my two cents: this feature interacts quite a lot with another new > feature: shared GPIOs in GPIOLIB. I've already either queued or have > under review ~7 other fixes. Since in stable, the code from this > series would not interact with gpiolib-shared (because no way this > should get backported), we'd still have a bit of a different > environment in mainline and stable branches. > > I would very much prefer to revert the patch in question than worry > about divergences in logic. Ok, fair enough, now reverted! thanks, greg k-h