From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from flow-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (flow-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26F7226980F; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.140 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765450164; cv=none; b=D0bnut07EdI4/yCyS+Geb8w2SpyVeW1RlAYHQOQxbqrq6TsPfuzCsizFAH/lUykGvB+H+v9TdBsfpwUjiSb6Un7wVeW+bCv6CyhZaZVLZ+O6lgwPFOh7/1XcKKSNGA6MZkG9qXRETLEg+oLWYChIjNw4kaihArGnRFevkWOrV3A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765450164; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZMtEOQfHto48TI2NKNfhRYnk7HR3pQP1Ggw3Ig0X68s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sS15yOy/klYSLQZjad+dhCAK4ixQq7/wWAsRuhl8jiL+dfN+Wh/E1m8D63Qqr5Mb82RdOByDpYivpBqmwL3qEiaxrQw98uEp8xlUZ8iZfVNiwzgwwitaTCUOr3GkTqMK+feY+E0FLJHxIy7J555ZgMlCThzoldo43SwlQnzR1oU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kroah.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kroah.com header.i=@kroah.com header.b=gteaPq/H; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=f5KV3Nef; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.140 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kroah.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kroah.com header.i=@kroah.com header.b="gteaPq/H"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="f5KV3Nef" Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailflow.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE081380392; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 05:49:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Dec 2025 05:49:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1765450161; x=1765457361; bh=mdcxiNd9OE 2zw6LOwpXaWFY/tSWlCV1tDp8LemnEQqI=; b=gteaPq/Hc6kbkAqiwI8Q3Q5Ynq f35ZS2ymrGRVHT0q428o74Fvgdm/5fbwp1/K2I9bICfoXMc7uyaAYd7WZpfxOmVq 9iEMzjtJthUIFnR9unp2NY7OFw8FaiYRtlu0IV8Nv8ASJCg+M4p7P/HTAU/LrawE 277nzJeu2cGDPxTYph6Mq6vpbEZcbL2W5BAR54aYX4pDVCQah5lCsLWcyMDpenhW O1aCKIkmYuGs6JAYS9SFJTTUoVz1xvW+6xEjJfy4cTJUrvsa3RHSA6bMnJMk+hSy cUiHlpM/sIYP6o2CgnTBBWtlWBX2kPPZc6qjtJOFZaxERGuz7Zni7xJGrjfQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1765450161; x=1765457361; bh=mdcxiNd9OE2zw6LOwpXaWFY/tSWlCV1tDp8 LemnEQqI=; b=f5KV3NefGz0q79ugNgB5i6zV8RgCFv13lgyASFSFeB41TauIag/ 6Sr4nX/2cB6s5NsWs6PxCjvCciY92j6HmFnQ5E//06ZldwqcWf6ZZvhCu/agtriO QbEfIjKSxTCSFjwzpvLz0XBISI5iLqcwaf4VJW5mX+aIesih5JevP1KfvAhz3Udz ZllEAAm0eKfUbLfAqT54hvmZbeGYyQon5tQVyqVzcM0IboV9hZhPEJZ//eVM3KJi FjPFi5ZHbk8yd5wbM5RgxleigJZunDJn2ZLYeiL5b/lldVJ+c+hraY7gI55YKT1I pFEPzEbRH9XrSMThdhX/M3xv4em/XwCq9SA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgddvhedutdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefirhgvghcumffj uceoghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegheeuhefgtd eluddtleekfeegjeetgeeikeehfeduieffvddufeefleevtddtvdenucffohhmrghinhep khgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvgedp mhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepmhgrrhhkuhhsrdgvlhhfrhhinhhgse ifvggsrdguvgdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhhrghogihirghnghesihhsrhgtrdhishgtrghs rdgrtgdrtghnpdhrtghpthhtohepnhgvthguvghvsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorh hgpdhrtghpthhtoheprghnughrvgifodhnvghtuggvvheslhhunhhnrdgthhdprhgtphht thhopegurghvvghmsegurghvvghmlhhofhhtrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepvgguuhhmrg iivghtsehgohhoghhlvgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehkuhgsrgeskhgvrhhnvghlrdho rhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepphgrsggvnhhisehrvgguhhgrthdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhope hhohhrmhhssehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i787e41f1:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 05:49:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 19:49:16 +0900 From: Greg KH To: Markus Elfring Cc: Haoxiang Li , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Taku Izumi , stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fjes: Add missing iounmap in fjes_hw_init() Message-ID: <2025121108-armless-earthling-7a6f@gregkh> References: <20251211073756.101824-1-lihaoxiang@isrc.iscas.ac.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 10:10:37AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > > In error paths, add fjes_hw_iounmap() to release the > > resource acquired by fjes_hw_iomap(). Add a goto label > > to do so. > > Under which circumstances would you get into the mood to take more desirable > word wrap preferences better into account? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.18#n658 Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot