From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B6DE26CE2C; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 15:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766242816; cv=none; b=JDvbIXnu9uj7sC4Fio3E/QQmnqctImlTngdFBh3JNG9LHiA2WqL2zuC+oiWCHE3SBI8TTlUvdh4QQVwl0S48VB89rgZifyG6VqhPs0SOr7wsb31ztcmafJ2zM/eox/5eVk4Jxla/XoykZ2i3kSiFWLan3JnpXRLW4a8mYAt7sNA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766242816; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uSnvQA1wkSEC1dHkQCd7ejRleGA1HqpoOspiSpwnylk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Wi+g5iGOE9Bzu0Hmk6hA/boMJs+S5b9+v6npSp5bj6lCJPBlQtf9hc3Gv5zKmZTb+8j6WRyYbfMh+QQofdEIFmqxVM/Sng1sePWNAX4dxA7IuPDskR6zLuQdekd8hw0m1TqejlD9mO05wgMZtqiQn7eNKmu1Y2iP47sOIAXBWd4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=AKbSROxq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="AKbSROxq" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1766242814; x=1797778814; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=uSnvQA1wkSEC1dHkQCd7ejRleGA1HqpoOspiSpwnylk=; b=AKbSROxqsswvff4FNbDxuxUnHFpcUzR5zlAp9+2g1lKOzG1Q/xTDNAGF WqQ+ZIqG0/gPyVJp7REh1qgNJflfQswQJhwGnVIytTACVtePdh3Nu9hl9 35dac042ThpHh+a3wv/N0KecZWhCl1H9tsS4nCx6Y98GZmYQROXcgXtEa kKlTMRteP1qCgvEQDTWmOSKVJ/cT3tjwBdac4nf+OD5oy2dR7KbZbtBCX W4niTG9APP2siGG/RqeEENbswUyr5yT6ORMrwkJ8bhpVINfVtp/lvNlFk ynbq+G2QsJCCZPiO46EYfStJO40tiKQvneZ1vW5jRaO2OYQEfLF5Cnnx6 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: iMBOFmq2T8OB0L5SqPVbuw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: D6JXmFSbSbiglmig3zmAVQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11648"; a="72034843" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,164,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="72034843" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2025 07:00:13 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: imxei5xGQcSOqyMwLY3qDQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: cnKfc8VmRHW6tcsjhj20iw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,164,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="198359995" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 0d09efa1b85f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa010.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2025 07:00:12 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 0d09efa1b85f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vWyRF-000000004hb-0ajS; Sat, 20 Dec 2025 15:00:09 +0000 Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 22:59:12 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Haoxiang Li , anna-maria@linutronix.de, frederic@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Haoxiang Li , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevents: add a error handling in tick_broadcast_init_sysfs() Message-ID: <202512202122.Alirqoxm-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251218090625.557965-1-lihaoxiang@isrc.iscas.ac.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251218090625.557965-1-lihaoxiang@isrc.iscas.ac.cn> Hi Haoxiang, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on tip/timers/core] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.19-rc1 next-20251219] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Haoxiang-Li/clockevents-add-a-error-handling-in-tick_broadcast_init_sysfs/20251218-170931 base: tip/timers/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251218090625.557965-1-lihaoxiang%40isrc.iscas.ac.cn patch subject: [PATCH] clockevents: add a error handling in tick_broadcast_init_sysfs() config: openrisc-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251220/202512202122.Alirqoxm-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251220/202512202122.Alirqoxm-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512202122.Alirqoxm-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/time/clockevents.c: In function 'tick_broadcast_init_sysfs': >> kernel/time/clockevents.c:737:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'put_deivce'; did you mean 'put_device'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 737 | put_deivce(&tick_bc_dev); | ^~~~~~~~~~ | put_device vim +737 kernel/time/clockevents.c 731 732 static __init int tick_broadcast_init_sysfs(void) 733 { 734 int err = device_register(&tick_bc_dev); 735 736 if (err) { > 737 put_deivce(&tick_bc_dev); 738 return err; 739 } 740 741 err = device_create_file(&tick_bc_dev, &dev_attr_current_device); 742 return err; 743 } 744 #else 745 static struct tick_device *tick_get_tick_dev(struct device *dev) 746 { 747 return &per_cpu(tick_cpu_device, dev->id); 748 } 749 static inline int tick_broadcast_init_sysfs(void) { return 0; } 750 #endif 751 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki