From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A48A34F278; Tue, 6 Jan 2026 17:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767720480; cv=none; b=mZNa6+HuRlJqj6x5nZIfoGSri/Uz6dUuWkOJT44Jx5Fhq5ceFr3Wfm4P0a0KlSPorNpP6XtLwMT79bIbB12fTwUpgnsiRLviTmT5Xkz0DUijcLTxx+WEOs3TpVetAgD3DpJuIR+J/zF322ZLNHXAQXqnlo0ZcxVB9sFO3JLkiwA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767720480; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FEVUhAy4PiGlHwX1GFU1SMzUYZzx3WIkNJNL4izjqRk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=G8n1Nh9kAkc3gMuyqbNpK2OwNO7TGRCtlVo6PzqUa2p269GUdZlFOu9NqFxt9CnAvpUvWL7D3JLCffM+99nhnShpc8lR87DnwWuPcAO2T3R9kSNbPqy+qbFMn4E1gqW37b1Z7YBdlrGpnple8/ePhEZ1TgsOpRXl11urf65TI8k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=UnYjeRKo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="UnYjeRKo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94B4EC19423; Tue, 6 Jan 2026 17:27:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1767720480; bh=FEVUhAy4PiGlHwX1GFU1SMzUYZzx3WIkNJNL4izjqRk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UnYjeRKoFlmwHmiQC0ULmhR5lWeW6Nezwd7gYt73zaPJo2zIuqrssE0AHHYrqxXSn PmALRtlJp7e3FWAqdr15xQnpGofNGDfZb3bkVJ6HWxvHptNhBQTkAO4U2yQi++ZMok o9JSSGouSATHs2P7Q5WgBtzgrBhX5+L9yJhNiYgs= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, stable@kernel.org, Xiaole He , Chao Yu , Jaegeuk Kim Subject: [PATCH 6.12 207/567] f2fs: fix age extent cache insertion skip on counter overflow Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 17:59:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20260106170458.981682967@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.52.0 In-Reply-To: <20260106170451.332875001@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260106170451.332875001@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Xiaole He commit 27bf6a637b7613fc85fa6af468b7d612d78cd5c0 upstream. The age extent cache uses last_blocks (derived from allocated_data_blocks) to determine data age. However, there's a conflict between the deletion marker (last_blocks=0) and legitimate last_blocks=0 cases when allocated_data_blocks overflows to 0 after reaching ULLONG_MAX. In this case, valid extents are incorrectly skipped due to the "if (!tei->last_blocks)" check in __update_extent_tree_range(). This patch fixes the issue by: 1. Reserving ULLONG_MAX as an invalid/deletion marker 2. Limiting allocated_data_blocks to range [0, ULLONG_MAX-1] 3. Using F2FS_EXTENT_AGE_INVALID for deletion scenarios 4. Adjusting overflow age calculation from ULLONG_MAX to (ULLONG_MAX-1) Reproducer (using a patched kernel with allocated_data_blocks initialized to ULLONG_MAX - 3 for quick testing): Step 1: Mount and check initial state # dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test.img bs=1M count=100 # mkfs.f2fs -f /tmp/test.img # mkdir -p /mnt/f2fs_test # mount -t f2fs -o loop,age_extent_cache /tmp/test.img /mnt/f2fs_test # cat /sys/kernel/debug/f2fs/status | grep -A 4 "Block Age" Allocated Data Blocks: 18446744073709551612 # ULLONG_MAX - 3 Inner Struct Count: tree: 1(0), node: 0 Step 2: Create files and write data to trigger overflow # touch /mnt/f2fs_test/{1,2,3,4}.txt; sync # cat /sys/kernel/debug/f2fs/status | grep -A 4 "Block Age" Allocated Data Blocks: 18446744073709551613 # ULLONG_MAX - 2 Inner Struct Count: tree: 5(0), node: 1 # dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/f2fs_test/1.txt bs=4K count=1; sync # cat /sys/kernel/debug/f2fs/status | grep -A 4 "Block Age" Allocated Data Blocks: 18446744073709551614 # ULLONG_MAX - 1 Inner Struct Count: tree: 5(0), node: 2 # dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/f2fs_test/2.txt bs=4K count=1; sync # cat /sys/kernel/debug/f2fs/status | grep -A 4 "Block Age" Allocated Data Blocks: 18446744073709551615 # ULLONG_MAX Inner Struct Count: tree: 5(0), node: 3 # dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/f2fs_test/3.txt bs=4K count=1; sync # cat /sys/kernel/debug/f2fs/status | grep -A 4 "Block Age" Allocated Data Blocks: 0 # Counter overflowed! Inner Struct Count: tree: 5(0), node: 4 Step 3: Trigger the bug - next write should create node but gets skipped # dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/f2fs_test/4.txt bs=4K count=1; sync # cat /sys/kernel/debug/f2fs/status | grep -A 4 "Block Age" Allocated Data Blocks: 1 Inner Struct Count: tree: 5(0), node: 4 Expected: node: 5 (new extent node for 4.txt) Actual: node: 4 (extent insertion was incorrectly skipped due to last_blocks = allocated_data_blocks = 0 in __get_new_block_age) After this fix, the extent node is correctly inserted and node count becomes 5 as expected. Fixes: 71644dff4811 ("f2fs: add block_age-based extent cache") Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Xiaole He Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 5 +++-- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 6 ++++++ fs/f2fs/segment.c | 9 +++++++-- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c @@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(s } goto out_read_extent_cache; update_age_extent_cache: - if (!tei->last_blocks) + if (tei->last_blocks == F2FS_EXTENT_AGE_INVALID) goto out_read_extent_cache; __set_extent_info(&ei, fofs, len, 0, false, @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ static int __get_new_block_age(struct in cur_age = cur_blocks - tei.last_blocks; else /* allocated_data_blocks overflow */ - cur_age = ULLONG_MAX - tei.last_blocks + cur_blocks; + cur_age = (ULLONG_MAX - 1) - tei.last_blocks + cur_blocks; if (tei.age) ei->age = __calculate_block_age(sbi, cur_age, tei.age); @@ -1062,6 +1062,7 @@ void f2fs_update_age_extent_cache_range( struct extent_info ei = { .fofs = fofs, .len = len, + .last_blocks = F2FS_EXTENT_AGE_INVALID, }; if (!__may_extent_tree(dn->inode, EX_BLOCK_AGE)) --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h @@ -644,6 +644,12 @@ enum extent_type { NR_EXTENT_CACHES, }; +/* + * Reserved value to mark invalid age extents, hence valid block range + * from 0 to ULLONG_MAX-1 + */ +#define F2FS_EXTENT_AGE_INVALID ULLONG_MAX + struct extent_info { unsigned int fofs; /* start offset in a file */ unsigned int len; /* length of the extent */ --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c @@ -3746,8 +3746,13 @@ skip_new_segment: locate_dirty_segment(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, old_blkaddr)); locate_dirty_segment(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, *new_blkaddr)); - if (IS_DATASEG(curseg->seg_type)) - atomic64_inc(&sbi->allocated_data_blocks); + if (IS_DATASEG(curseg->seg_type)) { + unsigned long long new_val; + + new_val = atomic64_inc_return(&sbi->allocated_data_blocks); + if (unlikely(new_val == ULLONG_MAX)) + atomic64_set(&sbi->allocated_data_blocks, 0); + } up_write(&sit_i->sentry_lock);