From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
Cc: "Abliyev, Reuven" <reuven.abliyev@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [char-misc v2] mei: trace: treat reg parameter as string
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 09:18:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026010830-overgrown-bouncing-422a@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026010801-lard-maximum-7bc3@gregkh>
On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 09:17:12AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 07:59:08AM +0000, Usyskin, Alexander wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [char-misc v2] mei: trace: treat reg parameter as string
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 07:42:22AM +0000, Usyskin, Alexander wrote:
> > > > > Subject: Re: [char-misc v2] mei: trace: treat reg parameter as string
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 08:57:02AM +0200, Alexander Usyskin wrote:
> > > > > > Use the string wrapper to check sanity of the reg parameters,
> > > > > > store it value independently and prevent internal kernel data leaks.
> > > > > > Trace subsystem refuses to emit event with plain char*,
> > > > > > without the wrapper.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > >
> > > > > Does this really fix a bug? If not, there's no need for cc: stable or:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Fixes: a0a927d06d79 ("mei: me: add io register tracing")
> > > > >
> > > > > That line as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > greg k-h
> > > >
> > > > Without this patch the events are not emitted at all, they are dropped
> > > > by trace security checker.
> > >
> > > Ah, again, that was not obvious at all from the changelog. Perhaps
> > > reword it a bit? How has this ever worked?
> > >
> >
> > This security hardening was introduced way after the initial commit
> > and the breakage went unnoticed for some time, unfortunately.
>
> So then the "Fixes:" tag is not correct :(
Wait, no, it is, but you need to say why this is now needed, and was not
a problem back then. And is this really ok to backport all the way to
that commit id, or should it just be relegated to the one where the
"hardening" feature was added?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-08 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-08 6:57 [char-misc v2] mei: trace: treat reg parameter as string Alexander Usyskin
2026-01-08 7:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-01-08 7:42 ` Usyskin, Alexander
2026-01-08 7:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-01-08 7:59 ` Usyskin, Alexander
2026-01-08 8:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-01-08 8:18 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-01-08 12:35 ` Usyskin, Alexander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026010830-overgrown-bouncing-422a@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.usyskin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reuven.abliyev@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox