From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBDEC23ED5B; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 12:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767960711; cv=none; b=BWwigR0WFtG4bzBA6K3kHZcc/N/NBsAeWsAkHmul0Z9hBjcTH5ZtOAgz6OrYIKb+S7Noa63AcnX15/xNQW355FCyCzsu4W3/kRtRXhIKmhXTmGjiKYrFed6lgMMLzpjEWIgVqTDgtxWhWSIrDsmIIdZwZIxA/vhsOtE8vRLia2I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767960711; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xG2aK7NRNsMK5xPZ/IZAYe33mlAR7xY/u+hGhGV3eFg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=txPFu3lqCgFjJVXpz2lxWUzkGLSsQ/HdAh+DnkdLhrODKhmaEVarRSX1pV+JeEZZWAW1vQljjPM/RwiReXP9TxK5amEG/Ds1ZzvTgqJdDP5U0qdLhEylgQP1+INqOAMm0gd5ynIDKZyndXcjhdCvMIYf36Rt5nijY8re8ciGhE0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=P3RxoiHL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="P3RxoiHL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44E8BC4CEF1; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 12:11:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1767960711; bh=xG2aK7NRNsMK5xPZ/IZAYe33mlAR7xY/u+hGhGV3eFg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=P3RxoiHLsxyS7Ob7Q5GcsgS+lO3VB+6tFHuOr7nnKTBLVKcz/iemkWkJRa9PwrAB+ b2OC+ROearI2vMsRX8Eqxmq8OXCXCa7Ky0F1zQeUNEGZW0Iq3xbzTUtwHw368z+Orr RSf+cEbZF7PzwoTBjbHu8KQwwooyyXgt2VtkByx8= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Yosry Ahmed , Sean Christopherson Subject: [PATCH 6.6 465/737] KVM: nSVM: Avoid incorrect injection of SVM_EXIT_CR0_SEL_WRITE Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 12:40:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20260109112151.481272890@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.52.0 In-Reply-To: <20260109112133.973195406@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260109112133.973195406@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Yosry Ahmed commit 3d80f4c93d3d26d0f9a0dd2844961a632eeea634 upstream. When emulating L2 instructions, svm_check_intercept() checks whether a write to CR0 should trigger a synthesized #VMEXIT with SVM_EXIT_CR0_SEL_WRITE. However, it does not check whether L1 enabled the intercept for SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR0, which has higher priority according to the APM (24593—Rev. 3.42—March 2024, Table 15-7): When both selective and non-selective CR0-write intercepts are active at the same time, the non-selective intercept takes priority. With respect to exceptions, the priority of this intercept is the same as the generic CR0-write intercept. Make sure L1 does NOT intercept SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR0 before checking if SVM_EXIT_CR0_SEL_WRITE needs to be injected. Opportunistically tweak the "not CR0" logic to explicitly bail early so that it's more obvious that only CR0 has a selective intercept, and that modifying icpt_info.exit_code is functionally necessary so that the call to nested_svm_exit_handled() checks the correct exit code. Fixes: cfec82cb7d31 ("KVM: SVM: Add intercept check for emulated cr accesses") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251024192918.3191141-4-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev [sean: isolate non-CR0 write logic, tweak comments accordingly] Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c @@ -4548,15 +4548,29 @@ static int svm_check_intercept(struct kv case SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR0: { unsigned long cr0, val; - if (info->intercept == x86_intercept_cr_write) + /* + * Adjust the exit code accordingly if a CR other than CR0 is + * being written, and skip straight to the common handling as + * only CR0 has an additional selective intercept. + */ + if (info->intercept == x86_intercept_cr_write && info->modrm_reg) { icpt_info.exit_code += info->modrm_reg; + break; + } - if (icpt_info.exit_code != SVM_EXIT_WRITE_CR0 || - info->intercept == x86_intercept_clts) + /* + * Convert the exit_code to SVM_EXIT_CR0_SEL_WRITE if a + * selective CR0 intercept is triggered (the common logic will + * treat the selective intercept as being enabled). Note, the + * unconditional intercept has higher priority, i.e. this is + * only relevant if *only* the selective intercept is enabled. + */ + if (vmcb12_is_intercept(&svm->nested.ctl, INTERCEPT_CR0_WRITE) || + !(vmcb12_is_intercept(&svm->nested.ctl, INTERCEPT_SELECTIVE_CR0))) break; - if (!(vmcb12_is_intercept(&svm->nested.ctl, - INTERCEPT_SELECTIVE_CR0))) + /* CLTS never triggers INTERCEPT_SELECTIVE_CR0 */ + if (info->intercept == x86_intercept_clts) break; cr0 = vcpu->arch.cr0 & ~SVM_CR0_SELECTIVE_MASK;