From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D3FA35293E; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768821267; cv=none; b=j2NKiZCyIwuI67kV/EL0c3APGuTMh9mpQEnIJ6P8sECr35qUQf/mUs+VpiQRjWa9EpR6M225oZ//4oz/6KewS6mQlV5tL1XFqFg+ABaeAluPUy/YeElxQ/fWmNXyD7kzXljHvXV0wLkMxJWHMuOEMYM+DloggZGq8PTFH+/htfU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768821267; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IDHGwUYov3TFysdOj69gbf74V050BVsTKwN0yWC8CgY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QCXWj8pSV4UXUcDKiM/UW4cdegrUOufhq2PasRyuI0b33d2bE8qeEcrwZmGi+zzQfjpgwhDc0YxnltlhAxQ+NGkrBMNxX4p39EPtm37HTq6VKQ+kGrSFx1HMD6G1PSwikmTAPdXXS27N7IWLfVv1Hy17wE4Cebk8uAQSYb+olhk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=ycC5QECu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="ycC5QECu" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D861EC116C6; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:14:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1768821267; bh=IDHGwUYov3TFysdOj69gbf74V050BVsTKwN0yWC8CgY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ycC5QECugumsh8Aes0gzRbpbr0BlL8uiHgO7W82IKi83BSiYtBOTjSr7iQ7PtnGa0 aNiZgyvLRKVi2yS1hOkvv0FhPragIqDBLkwyCNgreOt4GM56b/jt3PQOwV1IyWqR/N VRDTkCbcLa21XuvOBrdkLeeekGXtTzYNop+jK8Yg= Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 12:14:24 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Ben Hutchings Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Duoming Zhou , Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 324/451] media: TDA1997x: Remove redundant cancel_delayed_work in probe Message-ID: <2026011905-progeny-muppet-d537@gregkh> References: <20260115164230.864985076@linuxfoundation.org> <20260115164242.620539205@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 03:05:36PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2026-01-15 at 17:48 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Duoming Zhou > > > > commit 29de195ca39fc2ac0af6fd45522994df9f431f80 upstream. > > > > The delayed_work delayed_work_enable_hpd is initialized with > > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(), but it is never scheduled in tda1997x_probe(). > > > > It seems like it can be scheduled as soon as the probe function calls > v4l2_async_register_subdev(). > > > Calling cancel_delayed_work() on a work that has never been > > scheduled is redundant and unnecessary, as there is no pending > > work to cancel. > > > > Remove the redundant cancel_delayed_work() from error handling > > path in tda1997x_probe() to avoid potential confusion. > > I don't believe this is redundant at all. > > In any case, this doesn't seem to be a candidate for stable since a > redundant cancel_delayed_work() is harmless. Let's leave this as that's what is in Linus's tree, and the other stable releases. thanks, greg k-h