From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
qianfan Zhao <qianfanguijin@163.com>,
Adriana Nicolae <adriana@arista.com>,
Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@linaro.org>,
Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@linaro.org>,
Matt Porter <matt.porter@linaro.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "Bandal,
Shankar" <shankar.bandal@intel.com>,
"Murthy, Shanth" <shanth.murthy@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] serial: 8250_dw: Ensure BUSY is deasserted
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:22:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026012608-slicing-vehicular-6987@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260123172739.13410-7-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 07:27:39PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> DW UART cannot write to LCR, DLL, and DLH while BUSY is asserted.
> Existance of BUSY depends on uart_16550_compatible, if UART HW is
> configured with 16550 compatible those registers can always be written.
>
> There currently is dw8250_force_idle() which attempts to archive
> non-BUSY state by disabling FIFO, however, the solution is unreliable
> when Rx keeps getting more and more characters.
>
> Create a sequence of operations to enforce that ensures UART cannot
> keep BUSY asserted indefinitely. The new sequence relies on enabling
> loopback mode temporarily to prevent incoming Rx characters keeping
> UART BUSY.
>
> Ensure no Tx in ongoing while the UART is switches into the loopback
> mode (requires exporting serial8250_fifo_wait_for_lsr_thre() and adding
> DMA Tx pause/resume functions).
>
> According to tests performed by Adriana Nicolae <adriana@arista.com>,
> simply disabling FIFO or clearing FIFOs only once does not always
> ensure BUSY is deasserted but up to two tries may be needed. This could
> be related to ongoing Rx of a character (a guess, not known for sure).
> Therefore, retry FIFO clearing a few times (retry limit 4 is arbitrary
> number but using, e.g., p->fifosize seems overly large). Tests
> performed by others did not exhibit similar challenge but it does not
> seem harmful to leave the FIFO clearing loop in place for all DW UARTs
> with BUSY functionality.
>
> Use the new dw8250_idle_enter/exit() to do divisor writes and LCR
> writes. In case of plain LCR writes, opportunistically try to update
> LCR first and only invoke dw8250_idle_enter() if the write did not
> succeed (it has been observed that in practice most LCR writes do
> succeed without complications).
>
> This issue was first reported by qianfan Zhao who put lots of debugging
> effort into understanding the solution space.
>
> Fixes: c49436b657d0 ("serial: 8250_dw: Improve unwritable LCR workaround")
> Fixes: 7d4008ebb1c9 ("tty: add a DesignWare 8250 driver")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Why is patch 6/6 only marked for stable? If this is needed "now",
shouldn't this be a separate patch? Do you need all of the first 5 for
this to work properly?
I can't take this series as-is because I don't know how to route it :(
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260123172739.13410-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
2026-01-23 17:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] serial: 8250_dw: Ensure BUSY is deasserted Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-23 22:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-27 13:35 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-27 14:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-01-27 14:40 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-27 16:19 ` John Ogness
2026-01-26 15:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-01-27 14:45 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026012608-slicing-vehicular-6987@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=adriana@arista.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.mayer@linaro.org \
--cc=matt.porter@linaro.org \
--cc=qianfanguijin@163.com \
--cc=shankar.bandal@intel.com \
--cc=shanth.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.kryger@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox