From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ravi@prevas.dk,Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,peda@axentia.se,stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] iio: core: add separate lockdep class for info_exist_lock" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 14:15:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026012654-trend-outback-5af6@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.18-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.18.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 9910159f06590c17df4fbddedaabb4c0201cc4cb
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026012654-trend-outback-5af6@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.18.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 9910159f06590c17df4fbddedaabb4c0201cc4cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@prevas.dk>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:17:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] iio: core: add separate lockdep class for info_exist_lock
When one iio device is a consumer of another, it is possible that
the ->info_exist_lock of both ends up being taken when reading the
value of the consumer device.
Since they currently belong to the same lockdep class (being
initialized in a single location with mutex_init()), that results in a
lockdep warning
CPU0
----
lock(&iio_dev_opaque->info_exist_lock);
lock(&iio_dev_opaque->info_exist_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by sensors/414:
#0: c31fd6dc (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read_iter+0x44/0x4e4
#1: c4f5a1c4 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x1c/0xac
#2: c2827548 (kn->active#34){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x30/0xac
#3: c1dd2b68 (&iio_dev_opaque->info_exist_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: iio_read_channel_processed_scale+0x24/0xd8
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 414 Comm: sensors Not tainted 6.17.11 #5 NONE
Hardware name: Generic AM33XX (Flattened Device Tree)
Call trace:
unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x60
dump_stack_lvl from print_deadlock_bug+0x2b8/0x334
print_deadlock_bug from __lock_acquire+0x13a4/0x2ab0
__lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2c0
lock_acquire from __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xe8c
__mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
mutex_lock_nested from iio_read_channel_raw+0x20/0x6c
iio_read_channel_raw from rescale_read_raw+0x128/0x1c4
rescale_read_raw from iio_channel_read+0xe4/0xf4
iio_channel_read from iio_read_channel_processed_scale+0x6c/0xd8
iio_read_channel_processed_scale from iio_hwmon_read_val+0x68/0xbc
iio_hwmon_read_val from dev_attr_show+0x18/0x48
dev_attr_show from sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x80/0x110
sysfs_kf_seq_show from seq_read_iter+0xdc/0x4e4
seq_read_iter from vfs_read+0x238/0x2e4
vfs_read from ksys_read+0x6c/0xec
ksys_read from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Just as the mlock_key already has its own lockdep class, add a
lock_class_key for the info_exist mutex.
Note that this has in theory been a problem since before IIO first
left staging, but it only occurs when a chain of consumers is in use
and that is not often done.
Fixes: ac917a81117c ("staging:iio:core set the iio_dev.info pointer to null on unregister under lock.")
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@prevas.dk>
Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
index f69deefcfb6f..117ffad4f376 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
@@ -1657,6 +1657,7 @@ static void iio_dev_release(struct device *device)
mutex_destroy(&iio_dev_opaque->info_exist_lock);
mutex_destroy(&iio_dev_opaque->mlock);
+ lockdep_unregister_key(&iio_dev_opaque->info_exist_key);
lockdep_unregister_key(&iio_dev_opaque->mlock_key);
ida_free(&iio_ida, iio_dev_opaque->id);
@@ -1717,9 +1718,10 @@ struct iio_dev *iio_device_alloc(struct device *parent, int sizeof_priv)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iio_dev_opaque->ioctl_handlers);
lockdep_register_key(&iio_dev_opaque->mlock_key);
+ lockdep_register_key(&iio_dev_opaque->info_exist_key);
mutex_init_with_key(&iio_dev_opaque->mlock, &iio_dev_opaque->mlock_key);
- mutex_init(&iio_dev_opaque->info_exist_lock);
+ mutex_init_with_key(&iio_dev_opaque->info_exist_lock, &iio_dev_opaque->info_exist_key);
indio_dev->dev.parent = parent;
indio_dev->dev.type = &iio_device_type;
diff --git a/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h b/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h
index 4247497f3f8b..b87841a355f8 100644
--- a/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h
+++ b/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
* @mlock: lock used to prevent simultaneous device state changes
* @mlock_key: lockdep class for iio_dev lock
* @info_exist_lock: lock to prevent use during removal
+ * @info_exist_key: lockdep class for info_exist lock
* @trig_readonly: mark the current trigger immutable
* @event_interface: event chrdevs associated with interrupt lines
* @attached_buffers: array of buffers statically attached by the driver
@@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ struct iio_dev_opaque {
struct mutex mlock;
struct lock_class_key mlock_key;
struct mutex info_exist_lock;
+ struct lock_class_key info_exist_key;
bool trig_readonly;
struct iio_event_interface *event_interface;
struct iio_buffer **attached_buffers;
next reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-26 13:15 gregkh [this message]
2026-01-26 16:53 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 1/2] iio: core: Replace lockdep_set_class() + mutex_init() by combined call Sasha Levin
2026-01-26 16:53 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 2/2] iio: core: add separate lockdep class for info_exist_lock Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026012654-trend-outback-5af6@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=ravi@prevas.dk \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox