From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2D383A0B0C; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 12:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770294972; cv=none; b=hr3Qj5csE9i4eH4Oqm/TZprebzTrWtXNQeEk/OhlqY+heiAwoZbzyhJ0namV605ulmMOGufrDt5wrh8+j4FALKvO0z11crMqiHvHmLpHBFyMggWcMxqrIMDrbC4o8YWfLAtc0vYLsbNKcomVuhxDK9gITcn2lJZgTTSSWFbUCg4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770294972; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1o9nRoYrT4ZxuzQQkQs5GnNFnEpSrWQvVQNAVYT0lkI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GFffgjSvRq83VVnQAxRAaD2WIoqEC5bUFxTNrSQfK06S9+lL9v3G7BFIxuZdJBimkmFqlV5Z1sYjAbJola1GHqjCcmWcVcf7ZZxq+BjeEjm2DZ9GY/c6lv8kPXcZrAclYg16Z79gJHAGIj1dmSQV49UDw8r/EBXD+OXymVIxtvM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=T+zuAFEh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="T+zuAFEh" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770294972; x=1801830972; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1o9nRoYrT4ZxuzQQkQs5GnNFnEpSrWQvVQNAVYT0lkI=; b=T+zuAFEhrM4SRDM/kHQODHH49yc+we2li4YhG53J7hHdRs2HDDseWp/3 r2KHu+nLgDW18WcG7DKzysSIVhXonMPNAdcjMvl07vZ0hsGbIBwySX+Ob q8nZwFOGQZDFrcDJdeHpvdi8kcIRkvUapuB/YNP71mXOhgGK6W0ITYEjO eyupKSRAfH10SSNY1uVshMvwyZuKB+YeEV+yW7dC6OYCNKfz1f8i726oY YuCg7YV4JX4BWEkfo4O4+InOzyoXVvNzC32H+KmlqqcVljpX0zc5XgPoo 4ALTG3Q7wbo27ZxU3QXuL2CTuuqJYdF6W8xgsu+1Sk7aWBsPopdK6J16T w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 8riIcqrISQ6Y19qY+/iJUg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: tKqnenlsSt+2BRPdFXvLeQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11691"; a="94141600" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,274,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="94141600" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2026 04:36:12 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: A9sE/6y9RFW99Xw8YfOSuw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Jplz5ri8SsqM+aIDTkHy8g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,274,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="209789179" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 765f4a05e27f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa010.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2026 04:36:08 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 765f4a05e27f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vnyab-00000000joW-0WB7; Thu, 05 Feb 2026 12:36:05 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 20:35:25 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Nikunj A Dadhania , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, xin@zytor.com, seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, jon.grimm@amd.com, nikunj@amd.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fred: Fix early boot failures on SEV-ES/SNP guests Message-ID: <202602052054.J3CEkmKB-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260205051030.1225975-1-nikunj@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260205051030.1225975-1-nikunj@amd.com> Hi Nikunj, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 3c2ca964f75460093a8aad6b314a6cd558e80e66] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Nikunj-A-Dadhania/x86-fred-Fix-early-boot-failures-on-SEV-ES-SNP-guests/20260205-131359 base: 3c2ca964f75460093a8aad6b314a6cd558e80e66 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260205051030.1225975-1-nikunj%40amd.com patch subject: [PATCH] x86/fred: Fix early boot failures on SEV-ES/SNP guests config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260205/202602052054.J3CEkmKB-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260205/202602052054.J3CEkmKB-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602052054.J3CEkmKB-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c:213:11: error: call to undeclared function 'user_exc_vmm_communication'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 213 | return user_exc_vmm_communication(regs, error_code); | ^ arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c:213:4: warning: void function 'fred_hwexc' should not return a value [-Wreturn-mismatch] 213 | return user_exc_vmm_communication(regs, error_code); | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c:215:11: error: call to undeclared function 'kernel_exc_vmm_communication'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 215 | return kernel_exc_vmm_communication(regs, error_code); | ^ arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c:215:4: warning: void function 'fred_hwexc' should not return a value [-Wreturn-mismatch] 215 | return kernel_exc_vmm_communication(regs, error_code); | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 warnings and 2 errors generated. vim +/user_exc_vmm_communication +213 arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c 180 181 static noinstr void fred_hwexc(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code) 182 { 183 /* Optimize for #PF. That's the only exception which matters performance wise */ 184 if (likely(regs->fred_ss.vector == X86_TRAP_PF)) 185 return exc_page_fault(regs, error_code); 186 187 switch (regs->fred_ss.vector) { 188 case X86_TRAP_DE: return exc_divide_error(regs); 189 case X86_TRAP_DB: return fred_exc_debug(regs); 190 case X86_TRAP_BR: return exc_bounds(regs); 191 case X86_TRAP_UD: return exc_invalid_op(regs); 192 case X86_TRAP_NM: return exc_device_not_available(regs); 193 case X86_TRAP_DF: return exc_double_fault(regs, error_code); 194 case X86_TRAP_TS: return exc_invalid_tss(regs, error_code); 195 case X86_TRAP_NP: return exc_segment_not_present(regs, error_code); 196 case X86_TRAP_SS: return exc_stack_segment(regs, error_code); 197 case X86_TRAP_GP: return exc_general_protection(regs, error_code); 198 case X86_TRAP_MF: return exc_coprocessor_error(regs); 199 case X86_TRAP_AC: return exc_alignment_check(regs, error_code); 200 case X86_TRAP_XF: return exc_simd_coprocessor_error(regs); 201 202 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE 203 case X86_TRAP_MC: return fred_exc_machine_check(regs); 204 #endif 205 #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST 206 case X86_TRAP_VE: return exc_virtualization_exception(regs); 207 #endif 208 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_CET 209 case X86_TRAP_CP: return exc_control_protection(regs, error_code); 210 #endif 211 case X86_TRAP_VC: 212 if (user_mode(regs)) > 213 return user_exc_vmm_communication(regs, error_code); 214 else > 215 return kernel_exc_vmm_communication(regs, error_code); 216 default: return fred_bad_type(regs, error_code); 217 } 218 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki