public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Stanislav Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@gmail.com>,
	Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>,
	Alice Michael <alice.michael@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] net: intel: fix PCI device ID conflict between i40e and ipw2200
Date: Mon,  9 Feb 2026 18:12:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260210021235.16315-1-enelsonmoore@gmail.com> (raw)

The ID 8086:104f is matched by both i40e and ipw2200. The same device
ID should not be in more than one driver, because in that case, which
driver is used is unpredictable. Fix this by taking advantage of the
fact that i40e devices use PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET and ipw2200
devices use PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_OTHER to differentiate the devices.

Fixes: 2e45d3f4677a ("i40e: Add support for X710 B/P & SFP+ cards")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@gmail.com>
---
Changes from v1:
Rebase on latest mainline instead of net-next

 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c  | 8 +++++++-
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c | 8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
index d3bc3207054f..02de186dcc8f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
@@ -75,7 +75,13 @@ static const struct pci_device_id i40e_pci_tbl[] = {
 	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, I40E_DEV_ID_10G_BASE_T4), 0},
 	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, I40E_DEV_ID_10G_BASE_T_BC), 0},
 	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, I40E_DEV_ID_10G_SFP), 0},
-	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, I40E_DEV_ID_10G_B), 0},
+	/*
+	 * This ID conflicts with ipw2200, but the devices can be differentiated
+	 * because i40e devices use PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET and ipw2200
+	 * devices use PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_OTHER.
+	 */
+	{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, I40E_DEV_ID_10G_B),
+		PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET << 8, 0xffff00, 0},
 	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, I40E_DEV_ID_KX_X722), 0},
 	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, I40E_DEV_ID_QSFP_X722), 0},
 	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, I40E_DEV_ID_SFP_X722), 0},
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c
index 09035a77e775..b0e769da9415 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c
@@ -11387,7 +11387,13 @@ static const struct pci_device_id card_ids[] = {
 	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1043, 0x8086, 0x2754, 0, 0, 0},
 	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1043, 0x8086, 0x2761, 0, 0, 0},
 	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1043, 0x8086, 0x2762, 0, 0, 0},
-	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x104f), 0},
+	/*
+	 * This ID conflicts with i40e, but the devices can be differentiated
+	 * because i40e devices use PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET and ipw2200
+	 * devices use PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_OTHER.
+	 */
+	{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x104f),
+		PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_OTHER << 8, 0xffff00, 0},
 	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x4220), 0},	/* BG */
 	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x4221), 0},	/* BG */
 	{PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x4223), 0},	/* ABG */
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-02-10  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-10  2:12 Ethan Nelson-Moore [this message]
2026-02-10  7:11 ` [PATCH v2] net: intel: fix PCI device ID conflict between i40e and ipw2200 Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-02-13  2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260210021235.16315-1-enelsonmoore@gmail.com \
    --to=enelsonmoore@gmail.com \
    --cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
    --cc=alice.michael@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stas.yakovlev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox