[PATCH net v6 1/1] net/sched: act_gate: snapshot parameters with RCU on replace

[PATCH net v6 1/1] net/sched: act_gate: snapshot parameters with RCU on replace

[Paul Moses]

The gate action can be replaced while the hrtimer callback or dump path is
walking the schedule list.

Convert the parameters to an RCU-protected snapshot and swap updates under
tcf_lock, freeing the previous snapshot via call_rcu(). When REPLACE omits
the entry list, preserve the existing schedule so the effective state is
unchanged.

Fixes: a51c328df310 ("net: qos: introduce a gate control flow action")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Moses <p@1g4.org>
---
 include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h |  33 ++++-
 net/sched/act_gate.c         | 275 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h b/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h
index c1a67149c6b62..5223c00279d5a 100644
--- a/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h
+++ b/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct tcf_gate_params {
 	s32			tcfg_clockid;
 	size_t			num_entries;
 	struct list_head	entries;
+	struct rcu_head		rcu;
 };
 
 #define GATE_ACT_GATE_OPEN	BIT(0)
@@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ struct tcf_gate_params {
 
 struct tcf_gate {
 	struct tc_action	common;
-	struct tcf_gate_params	param;
+	struct tcf_gate_params __rcu *param;
 	u8			current_gate_status;
 	ktime_t			current_close_time;
 	u32			current_entry_octets;
@@ -51,47 +52,65 @@ struct tcf_gate {
 
 #define to_gate(a) ((struct tcf_gate *)a)
 
+static inline struct tcf_gate_params *tcf_gate_params_locked(const struct tc_action *a)
+{
+	struct tcf_gate *gact = to_gate(a);
+
+	return rcu_dereference_protected(gact->param,
+					 lockdep_is_held(&gact->tcf_lock));
+}
+
 static inline s32 tcf_gate_prio(const struct tc_action *a)
 {
+	struct tcf_gate_params *p;
 	s32 tcfg_prio;
 
-	tcfg_prio = to_gate(a)->param.tcfg_priority;
+	p = tcf_gate_params_locked(a);
+	tcfg_prio = p->tcfg_priority;
 
 	return tcfg_prio;
 }
 
 static inline u64 tcf_gate_basetime(const struct tc_action *a)
 {
+	struct tcf_gate_params *p;
 	u64 tcfg_basetime;
 
-	tcfg_basetime = to_gate(a)->param.tcfg_basetime;
+	p = tcf_gate_params_locked(a);
+	tcfg_basetime = p->tcfg_basetime;
 
 	return tcfg_basetime;
 }
 
 static inline u64 tcf_gate_cycletime(const struct tc_action *a)
 {
+	struct tcf_gate_params *p;
 	u64 tcfg_cycletime;
 
-	tcfg_cycletime = to_gate(a)->param.tcfg_cycletime;
+	p = tcf_gate_params_locked(a);
+	tcfg_cycletime = p->tcfg_cycletime;
 
 	return tcfg_cycletime;
 }
 
 static inline u64 tcf_gate_cycletimeext(const struct tc_action *a)
 {
+	struct tcf_gate_params *p;
 	u64 tcfg_cycletimeext;
 
-	tcfg_cycletimeext = to_gate(a)->param.tcfg_cycletime_ext;
+	p = tcf_gate_params_locked(a);
+	tcfg_cycletimeext = p->tcfg_cycletime_ext;
 
 	return tcfg_cycletimeext;
 }
 
 static inline u32 tcf_gate_num_entries(const struct tc_action *a)
 {
+	struct tcf_gate_params *p;
 	u32 num_entries;
 
-	num_entries = to_gate(a)->param.num_entries;
+	p = tcf_gate_params_locked(a);
+	num_entries = p->num_entries;
 
 	return num_entries;
 }
@@ -105,7 +124,7 @@ static inline struct action_gate_entry
 	u32 num_entries;
 	int i = 0;
 
-	p = &to_gate(a)->param;
+	p = tcf_gate_params_locked(a);
 	num_entries = p->num_entries;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(entry, &p->entries, list)
diff --git a/net/sched/act_gate.c b/net/sched/act_gate.c
index c1f75f2727576..60c80e609ec3d 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_gate.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_gate.c
@@ -32,9 +32,12 @@ static ktime_t gate_get_time(struct tcf_gate *gact)
 	return KTIME_MAX;
 }
 
-static void gate_get_start_time(struct tcf_gate *gact, ktime_t *start)
+static void tcf_gate_params_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head);
+
+static void gate_get_start_time(struct tcf_gate *gact,
+				const struct tcf_gate_params *param,
+				ktime_t *start)
 {
-	struct tcf_gate_params *param = &gact->param;
 	ktime_t now, base, cycle;
 	u64 n;
 
@@ -56,11 +59,10 @@ static void gate_start_timer(struct tcf_gate *gact, ktime_t start)
 {
 	ktime_t expires;
 
-	expires = hrtimer_get_expires(&gact->hitimer);
-	if (expires == 0)
-		expires = KTIME_MAX;
-
-	start = min_t(ktime_t, start, expires);
+	if (hrtimer_active(&gact->hitimer)) {
+		expires = hrtimer_get_expires(&gact->hitimer);
+		start = min_t(ktime_t, start, expires);
+	}
 
 	hrtimer_start(&gact->hitimer, start, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_SOFT);
 }
@@ -69,12 +71,14 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart gate_timer_func(struct hrtimer *timer)
 {
 	struct tcf_gate *gact = container_of(timer, struct tcf_gate,
 					     hitimer);
-	struct tcf_gate_params *p = &gact->param;
 	struct tcfg_gate_entry *next;
+	struct tcf_gate_params *p;
 	ktime_t close_time, now;
 
 	spin_lock(&gact->tcf_lock);
 
+	p = rcu_dereference_protected(gact->param,
+				      lockdep_is_held(&gact->tcf_lock));
 	next = gact->next_entry;
 
 	/* cycle start, clear pending bit, clear total octets */
@@ -225,6 +229,35 @@ static void release_entry_list(struct list_head *entries)
 	}
 }
 
+static int tcf_gate_copy_entries(struct tcf_gate_params *dst,
+				 const struct tcf_gate_params *src,
+				 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	struct tcfg_gate_entry *entry;
+	int i = 0;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(entry, &src->entries, list) {
+		struct tcfg_gate_entry *new;
+
+		new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_ATOMIC);
+		if (!new) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Not enough memory for entry");
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		}
+
+		new->index      = entry->index;
+		new->gate_state = entry->gate_state;
+		new->interval   = entry->interval;
+		new->ipv        = entry->ipv;
+		new->maxoctets  = entry->maxoctets;
+		list_add_tail(&new->list, &dst->entries);
+		i++;
+	}
+
+	dst->num_entries = i;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int parse_gate_list(struct nlattr *list_attr,
 			   struct tcf_gate_params *sched,
 			   struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
@@ -261,7 +294,6 @@ static int parse_gate_list(struct nlattr *list_attr,
 	}
 
 	sched->num_entries = i;
-
 	return i;
 
 release_list:
@@ -270,24 +302,44 @@ static int parse_gate_list(struct nlattr *list_attr,
 	return err;
 }
 
-static void gate_setup_timer(struct tcf_gate *gact, u64 basetime,
-			     enum tk_offsets tko, s32 clockid,
-			     bool do_init)
+static bool gate_timer_needs_cancel(u64 basetime, u64 old_basetime,
+				    enum tk_offsets tko,
+				    enum tk_offsets old_tko,
+				    s32 clockid, s32 old_clockid)
 {
-	if (!do_init) {
-		if (basetime == gact->param.tcfg_basetime &&
-		    tko == gact->tk_offset &&
-		    clockid == gact->param.tcfg_clockid)
-			return;
+	return basetime != old_basetime ||
+	       clockid != old_clockid ||
+	       tko != old_tko;
+}
 
-		spin_unlock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
-		hrtimer_cancel(&gact->hitimer);
-		spin_lock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
+static int gate_clock_resolve(s32 clockid, enum tk_offsets *tko,
+			      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	switch (clockid) {
+	case CLOCK_REALTIME:
+		*tko = TK_OFFS_REAL;
+		return 0;
+	case CLOCK_MONOTONIC:
+		*tko = TK_OFFS_MAX;
+		return 0;
+	case CLOCK_BOOTTIME:
+		*tko = TK_OFFS_BOOT;
+		return 0;
+	case CLOCK_TAI:
+		*tko = TK_OFFS_TAI;
+		return 0;
+	default:
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid 'clockid'");
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	gact->param.tcfg_basetime = basetime;
-	gact->param.tcfg_clockid = clockid;
-	gact->tk_offset = tko;
-	hrtimer_setup(&gact->hitimer, gate_timer_func, clockid, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_SOFT);
+}
+
+static void gate_setup_timer(struct tcf_gate *gact, s32 clockid,
+			     enum tk_offsets tko)
+{
+	WRITE_ONCE(gact->tk_offset, tko);
+	hrtimer_setup(&gact->hitimer, gate_timer_func, clockid,
+		      HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_SOFT);
 }
 
 static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
@@ -296,15 +348,22 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
 			 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
 	struct tc_action_net *tn = net_generic(net, act_gate_ops.net_id);
-	enum tk_offsets tk_offset = TK_OFFS_TAI;
+	u64 cycletime = 0, basetime = 0, cycletime_ext = 0;
+	struct tcf_gate_params *p = NULL, *old_p = NULL;
+	enum tk_offsets old_tk_offset = TK_OFFS_TAI;
+	const struct tcf_gate_params *cur_p = NULL;
 	bool bind = flags & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_BIND;
 	struct nlattr *tb[TCA_GATE_MAX + 1];
+	enum tk_offsets tko = TK_OFFS_TAI;
 	struct tcf_chain *goto_ch = NULL;
-	u64 cycletime = 0, basetime = 0;
-	struct tcf_gate_params *p;
+	s32 timer_clockid = CLOCK_TAI;
+	bool use_old_entries = false;
+	s32 old_clockid = CLOCK_TAI;
+	bool need_cancel = false;
 	s32 clockid = CLOCK_TAI;
 	struct tcf_gate *gact;
 	struct tc_gate *parm;
+	u64 old_basetime = 0;
 	int ret = 0, err;
 	u32 gflags = 0;
 	s32 prio = -1;
@@ -321,26 +380,8 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
 	if (!tb[TCA_GATE_PARMS])
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (tb[TCA_GATE_CLOCKID]) {
+	if (tb[TCA_GATE_CLOCKID])
 		clockid = nla_get_s32(tb[TCA_GATE_CLOCKID]);
-		switch (clockid) {
-		case CLOCK_REALTIME:
-			tk_offset = TK_OFFS_REAL;
-			break;
-		case CLOCK_MONOTONIC:
-			tk_offset = TK_OFFS_MAX;
-			break;
-		case CLOCK_BOOTTIME:
-			tk_offset = TK_OFFS_BOOT;
-			break;
-		case CLOCK_TAI:
-			tk_offset = TK_OFFS_TAI;
-			break;
-		default:
-			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid 'clockid'");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-	}
 
 	parm = nla_data(tb[TCA_GATE_PARMS]);
 	index = parm->index;
@@ -366,6 +407,60 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
 		return -EEXIST;
 	}
 
+	gact = to_gate(*a);
+
+	err = tcf_action_check_ctrlact(parm->action, tp, &goto_ch, extack);
+	if (err < 0)
+		goto release_idr;
+
+	p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!p) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto release_idr;
+	}
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->entries);
+
+	use_old_entries = !tb[TCA_GATE_ENTRY_LIST];
+	if (!use_old_entries) {
+		err = parse_gate_list(tb[TCA_GATE_ENTRY_LIST], p, extack);
+		if (err < 0)
+			goto err_free;
+		use_old_entries = !err;
+	}
+
+	if (ret == ACT_P_CREATED && use_old_entries) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "The entry list is empty");
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto err_free;
+	}
+
+	if (ret != ACT_P_CREATED) {
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		cur_p = rcu_dereference(gact->param);
+
+		old_basetime  = cur_p->tcfg_basetime;
+		old_clockid   = cur_p->tcfg_clockid;
+		old_tk_offset = READ_ONCE(gact->tk_offset);
+
+		basetime      = old_basetime;
+		cycletime_ext = cur_p->tcfg_cycletime_ext;
+		prio          = cur_p->tcfg_priority;
+		gflags        = cur_p->tcfg_flags;
+
+		if (!tb[TCA_GATE_CLOCKID])
+			clockid = old_clockid;
+
+		err = 0;
+		if (use_old_entries) {
+			err = tcf_gate_copy_entries(p, cur_p, extack);
+			if (!err && !tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME])
+				cycletime = cur_p->tcfg_cycletime;
+		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		if (err)
+			goto err_free;
+	}
+
 	if (tb[TCA_GATE_PRIORITY])
 		prio = nla_get_s32(tb[TCA_GATE_PRIORITY]);
 
@@ -375,25 +470,26 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
 	if (tb[TCA_GATE_FLAGS])
 		gflags = nla_get_u32(tb[TCA_GATE_FLAGS]);
 
-	gact = to_gate(*a);
-	if (ret == ACT_P_CREATED)
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gact->param.entries);
+	if (tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME])
+		cycletime = nla_get_u64(tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME]);
 
-	err = tcf_action_check_ctrlact(parm->action, tp, &goto_ch, extack);
-	if (err < 0)
-		goto release_idr;
+	if (tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME_EXT])
+		cycletime_ext = nla_get_u64(tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME_EXT]);
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
-	p = &gact->param;
+	err = gate_clock_resolve(clockid, &tko, extack);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_free;
+	timer_clockid = clockid;
 
-	if (tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME])
-		cycletime = nla_get_u64(tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME]);
+	need_cancel = ret != ACT_P_CREATED &&
+		      gate_timer_needs_cancel(basetime, old_basetime,
+					      tko, old_tk_offset,
+					      timer_clockid, old_clockid);
 
-	if (tb[TCA_GATE_ENTRY_LIST]) {
-		err = parse_gate_list(tb[TCA_GATE_ENTRY_LIST], p, extack);
-		if (err < 0)
-			goto chain_put;
-	}
+	if (need_cancel)
+		hrtimer_cancel(&gact->hitimer);
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
 
 	if (!cycletime) {
 		struct tcfg_gate_entry *entry;
@@ -404,20 +500,22 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
 		cycletime = cycle;
 		if (!cycletime) {
 			err = -EINVAL;
-			goto chain_put;
+			goto unlock;
 		}
 	}
 	p->tcfg_cycletime = cycletime;
+	p->tcfg_cycletime_ext = cycletime_ext;
 
-	if (tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME_EXT])
-		p->tcfg_cycletime_ext =
-			nla_get_u64(tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME_EXT]);
-
-	gate_setup_timer(gact, basetime, tk_offset, clockid,
-			 ret == ACT_P_CREATED);
+	if (need_cancel || ret == ACT_P_CREATED)
+		gate_setup_timer(gact, timer_clockid, tko);
 	p->tcfg_priority = prio;
 	p->tcfg_flags = gflags;
-	gate_get_start_time(gact, &start);
+	p->tcfg_basetime = basetime;
+	p->tcfg_clockid = timer_clockid;
+	gate_get_start_time(gact, p, &start);
+
+	old_p = rcu_replace_pointer(gact->param, p,
+				    lockdep_is_held(&gact->tcf_lock));
 
 	gact->current_close_time = start;
 	gact->current_gate_status = GATE_ACT_GATE_OPEN | GATE_ACT_PENDING;
@@ -434,33 +532,47 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
 	if (goto_ch)
 		tcf_chain_put_by_act(goto_ch);
 
+	if (old_p)
+		call_rcu(&old_p->rcu, tcf_gate_params_free_rcu);
+
 	return ret;
 
-chain_put:
+unlock:
 	spin_unlock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
 
+err_free:
+	release_entry_list(&p->entries);
+	kfree(p);
+release_idr:
 	if (goto_ch)
 		tcf_chain_put_by_act(goto_ch);
-release_idr:
+
 	/* action is not inserted in any list: it's safe to init hitimer
 	 * without taking tcf_lock.
 	 */
 	if (ret == ACT_P_CREATED)
-		gate_setup_timer(gact, gact->param.tcfg_basetime,
-				 gact->tk_offset, gact->param.tcfg_clockid,
-				 true);
+		gate_setup_timer(gact, timer_clockid, tko);
 	tcf_idr_release(*a, bind);
 	return err;
 }
 
+static void tcf_gate_params_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+	struct tcf_gate_params *p = container_of(head, struct tcf_gate_params, rcu);
+
+	release_entry_list(&p->entries);
+	kfree(p);
+}
+
 static void tcf_gate_cleanup(struct tc_action *a)
 {
 	struct tcf_gate *gact = to_gate(a);
 	struct tcf_gate_params *p;
 
-	p = &gact->param;
 	hrtimer_cancel(&gact->hitimer);
-	release_entry_list(&p->entries);
+	p = rcu_dereference_protected(gact->param, 1);
+	if (p)
+		call_rcu(&p->rcu, tcf_gate_params_free_rcu);
 }
 
 static int dumping_entry(struct sk_buff *skb,
@@ -509,10 +621,9 @@ static int tcf_gate_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a,
 	struct nlattr *entry_list;
 	struct tcf_t t;
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
-	opt.action = gact->tcf_action;
-
-	p = &gact->param;
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	opt.action = READ_ONCE(gact->tcf_action);
+	p = rcu_dereference(gact->param);
 
 	if (nla_put(skb, TCA_GATE_PARMS, sizeof(opt), &opt))
 		goto nla_put_failure;
@@ -552,12 +663,12 @@ static int tcf_gate_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a,
 	tcf_tm_dump(&t, &gact->tcf_tm);
 	if (nla_put_64bit(skb, TCA_GATE_TM, sizeof(t), &t, TCA_GATE_PAD))
 		goto nla_put_failure;
-	spin_unlock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return skb->len;
 
 nla_put_failure:
-	spin_unlock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	nlmsg_trim(skb, b);
 	return -1;
 }
-- 
2.53.0

Re: [net,v6,1/1] net/sched: act_gate: snapshot parameters with RCU on replace

[Simon Horman]

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.

For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
---
net/sched: act_gate: snapshot parameters with RCU on replace

The gate action can be replaced while the hrtimer callback or dump path is
walking the schedule list.

Convert the parameters to an RCU-protected snapshot and swap updates under
tcf_lock, freeing the previous snapshot via call_rcu(). When REPLACE omits
the entry list, preserve the existing schedule so the effective state is
unchanged.

> diff --git a/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h b/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h
> index c1a67149c6b6..5223c00279d5 100644
> --- a/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h
> +++ b/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct tcf_gate_params {
>  	s32			tcfg_clockid;
>  	size_t			num_entries;
>  	struct list_head	entries;
> +	struct rcu_head		rcu;
>  };
>
>  #define GATE_ACT_GATE_OPEN	BIT(0)
> @@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ struct tcf_gate_params {
>
>  struct tcf_gate {
>  	struct tc_action	common;
> -	struct tcf_gate_params	param;
> +	struct tcf_gate_params __rcu *param;
>  	u8			current_gate_status;
>  	ktime_t			current_close_time;
>  	u32			current_entry_octets;
> @@ -51,47 +52,65 @@ struct tcf_gate {
>
>  #define to_gate(a) ((struct tcf_gate *)a)
>
> +static inline struct tcf_gate_params *tcf_gate_params_locked(const struct tc_action *a)
> +{
> +	struct tcf_gate *gact = to_gate(a);
> +
> +	return rcu_dereference_protected(gact->param,
> +					 lockdep_is_held(&gact->tcf_lock));
> +}
> +
>  static inline s32 tcf_gate_prio(const struct tc_action *a)
>  {
> +	struct tcf_gate_params *p;
>  	s32 tcfg_prio;
>
> -	tcfg_prio = to_gate(a)->param.tcfg_priority;
> +	p = tcf_gate_params_locked(a);
> +	tcfg_prio = p->tcfg_priority;
>
>  	return tcfg_prio;
>  }

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/net/sched/act_gate.c b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> index c1f75f272757..60c80e609ec3 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_gate.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_gate.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -509,10 +621,9 @@ static int tcf_gate_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a,
>  	struct nlattr *entry_list;
>  	struct tcf_t t;
>
> -	spin_lock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
> -	opt.action = gact->tcf_action;
> -
> -	p = &gact->param;
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	opt.action = READ_ONCE(gact->tcf_action);
> +	p = rcu_dereference(gact->param);
>
>  	if (nla_put(skb, TCA_GATE_PARMS, sizeof(opt), &opt))
>  		goto nla_put_failure;
>
> @@ -552,12 +663,12 @@ static int tcf_gate_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a,
>  	tcf_tm_dump(&t, &gact->tcf_tm);
>  	if (nla_put_64bit(skb, TCA_GATE_TM, sizeof(t), &t, TCA_GATE_PAD))
>  		goto nla_put_failure;
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>
>  	return skb->len;
>
>  nla_put_failure:
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>  	nlmsg_trim(skb, b);
>  	return -1;
>  }

Can tcf_gate_dump be called before gact->param is initialized?

After the conversion to RCU pointers, if tcf_gate_dump is called during
action initialization (between tcf_idr_create_from_flags and
rcu_replace_pointer in tcf_gate_init), p will be NULL:

net/sched/act_gate.c:tcf_gate_init() {
    tcf_idr_create_from_flags(...);
    ...
    // gact->param still NULL here
    ...
    rcu_replace_pointer(gact->param, p, ...);  // line 517
}

net/sched/act_gate.c:tcf_gate_dump() {
    rcu_read_lock();
    p = rcu_dereference(gact->param);  // can be NULL

    if (nla_put_u64_64bit(skb, TCA_GATE_BASE_TIME,
                          p->tcfg_basetime, TCA_GATE_PAD))  // NULL deref
}

Before the patch, param was an embedded struct that was zero-initialized,
so dump would return valid (if meaningless) data. After the patch, this
becomes a NULL pointer dereference.

While the tc action framework may prevent dumping partially initialized
actions through external synchronization, should this code include a NULL
check to make the initialization window safer?

The second issue is in the hardware offload path. Looking at
net/sched/act_gate.c:tcf_gate_offload_act_setup(), the function calls the
accessor helpers without holding tcf_lock:

net/sched/act_gate.c:tcf_gate_offload_act_setup() {
    // no lock held here
    entry->gate.prio = tcf_gate_prio(act);           // line 723
    entry->gate.basetime = tcf_gate_basetime(act);
    entry->gate.cycletime = tcf_gate_cycletime(act);
    ...
}

include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h:tcf_gate_prio() {
    p = tcf_gate_params_locked(a);  // uses rcu_dereference_protected
    ...
}

include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h:tcf_gate_params_locked() {
    return rcu_dereference_protected(gact->param,
                                     lockdep_is_held(&gact->tcf_lock));
}

Does tcf_gate_offload_act_setup violate the locking requirements?

The accessor functions all use tcf_gate_params_locked(), which requires
tcf_lock to be held (verified via lockdep_is_held). The offload setup
function doesn't acquire this lock before calling the accessors.

With lockdep enabled, this will trigger warnings. Without lockdep, there's
a race where param can be replaced via rcu_replace_pointer while the
offload function is reading it, potentially causing reads of inconsistent
state.

The dump path uses the correct pattern with rcu_read_lock() and
rcu_dereference(). Should the offload path either acquire tcf_lock or use
a similar RCU-only approach?

Re: [net,v6,1/1] net/sched: act_gate: snapshot parameters with RCU on replace

[Paul Moses]

1. I don’t think this is reachable, during create, the IDR slot is populated 
   with ERR_PTR(-EBUSY) by tcf_idr_check_alloc(). The real action pointer is 
   only published later by tcf_idr_insert_many(), which runs after init() 
   returns and after tcf_gate_init() has already done:

     rcu_replace_pointer(gact->param, p, ...)

   Both the normal lookup path and the dump walker treat ERR_PTR entries as
   “not ready”: tcf_idr_search() rejects them and the dump walker skips.

2. offload_act_setup() is currently called with act->tcfa_lock held in both 
   call chains (net/sched/act_api.c and net/sched/cls_api.c). Since 
   gact->tcf_lock aliases common.tcfa_lock, the 
   lockdep_is_held(&gact->tcf_lock) condition in tcf_gate_params_locked() 
   is satisfied.

Thanks,
Paul




On Friday, February 13th, 2026 at 9:55 AM, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:

> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> 
> For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
> ---
> net/sched: act_gate: snapshot parameters with RCU on replace
> 
> The gate action can be replaced while the hrtimer callback or dump path is
> walking the schedule list.
> 
> Convert the parameters to an RCU-protected snapshot and swap updates under
> tcf_lock, freeing the previous snapshot via call_rcu(). When REPLACE omits
> the entry list, preserve the existing schedule so the effective state is
> unchanged.
> 
> > diff --git a/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h b/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h
> > index c1a67149c6b6..5223c00279d5 100644
> > --- a/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h
> > +++ b/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct tcf_gate_params {
> >  	s32			tcfg_clockid;
> >  	size_t			num_entries;
> >  	struct list_head	entries;
> > +	struct rcu_head		rcu;
> >  };
> >
> >  #define GATE_ACT_GATE_OPEN	BIT(0)
> > @@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ struct tcf_gate_params {
> >
> >  struct tcf_gate {
> >  	struct tc_action	common;
> > -	struct tcf_gate_params	param;
> > +	struct tcf_gate_params __rcu *param;
> >  	u8			current_gate_status;
> >  	ktime_t			current_close_time;
> >  	u32			current_entry_octets;
> > @@ -51,47 +52,65 @@ struct tcf_gate {
> >
> >  #define to_gate(a) ((struct tcf_gate *)a)
> >
> > +static inline struct tcf_gate_params *tcf_gate_params_locked(const struct tc_action *a)
> > +{
> > +	struct tcf_gate *gact = to_gate(a);
> > +
> > +	return rcu_dereference_protected(gact->param,
> > +					 lockdep_is_held(&gact->tcf_lock));
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline s32 tcf_gate_prio(const struct tc_action *a)
> >  {
> > +	struct tcf_gate_params *p;
> >  	s32 tcfg_prio;
> >
> > -	tcfg_prio = to_gate(a)->param.tcfg_priority;
> > +	p = tcf_gate_params_locked(a);
> > +	tcfg_prio = p->tcfg_priority;
> >
> >  	return tcfg_prio;
> >  }
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > diff --git a/net/sched/act_gate.c b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> > index c1f75f272757..60c80e609ec3 100644
> > --- a/net/sched/act_gate.c
> > +++ b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > @@ -509,10 +621,9 @@ static int tcf_gate_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a,
> >  	struct nlattr *entry_list;
> >  	struct tcf_t t;
> >
> > -	spin_lock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
> > -	opt.action = gact->tcf_action;
> > -
> > -	p = &gact->param;
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > +	opt.action = READ_ONCE(gact->tcf_action);
> > +	p = rcu_dereference(gact->param);
> >
> >  	if (nla_put(skb, TCA_GATE_PARMS, sizeof(opt), &opt))
> >  		goto nla_put_failure;
> >
> > @@ -552,12 +663,12 @@ static int tcf_gate_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a,
> >  	tcf_tm_dump(&t, &gact->tcf_tm);
> >  	if (nla_put_64bit(skb, TCA_GATE_TM, sizeof(t), &t, TCA_GATE_PAD))
> >  		goto nla_put_failure;
> > -	spin_unlock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
> > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> >  	return skb->len;
> >
> >  nla_put_failure:
> > -	spin_unlock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
> > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> >  	nlmsg_trim(skb, b);
> >  	return -1;
> >  }
> 
> Can tcf_gate_dump be called before gact->param is initialized?
> 
> After the conversion to RCU pointers, if tcf_gate_dump is called during
> action initialization (between tcf_idr_create_from_flags and
> rcu_replace_pointer in tcf_gate_init), p will be NULL:
> 
> net/sched/act_gate.c:tcf_gate_init() {
>     tcf_idr_create_from_flags(...);
>     ...
>     // gact->param still NULL here
>     ...
>     rcu_replace_pointer(gact->param, p, ...);  // line 517
> }
> 
> net/sched/act_gate.c:tcf_gate_dump() {
>     rcu_read_lock();
>     p = rcu_dereference(gact->param);  // can be NULL
> 
>     if (nla_put_u64_64bit(skb, TCA_GATE_BASE_TIME,
>                           p->tcfg_basetime, TCA_GATE_PAD))  // NULL deref
> }
> 
> Before the patch, param was an embedded struct that was zero-initialized,
> so dump would return valid (if meaningless) data. After the patch, this
> becomes a NULL pointer dereference.
> 
> While the tc action framework may prevent dumping partially initialized
> actions through external synchronization, should this code include a NULL
> check to make the initialization window safer?
> 
> The second issue is in the hardware offload path. Looking at
> net/sched/act_gate.c:tcf_gate_offload_act_setup(), the function calls the
> accessor helpers without holding tcf_lock:
> 
> net/sched/act_gate.c:tcf_gate_offload_act_setup() {
>     // no lock held here
>     entry->gate.prio = tcf_gate_prio(act);           // line 723
>     entry->gate.basetime = tcf_gate_basetime(act);
>     entry->gate.cycletime = tcf_gate_cycletime(act);
>     ...
> }
> 
> include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h:tcf_gate_prio() {
>     p = tcf_gate_params_locked(a);  // uses rcu_dereference_protected
>     ...
> }
> 
> include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h:tcf_gate_params_locked() {
>     return rcu_dereference_protected(gact->param,
>                                      lockdep_is_held(&gact->tcf_lock));
> }
> 
> Does tcf_gate_offload_act_setup violate the locking requirements?
> 
> The accessor functions all use tcf_gate_params_locked(), which requires
> tcf_lock to be held (verified via lockdep_is_held). The offload setup
> function doesn't acquire this lock before calling the accessors.
> 
> With lockdep enabled, this will trigger warnings. Without lockdep, there's
> a race where param can be replaced via rcu_replace_pointer while the
> offload function is reading it, potentially causing reads of inconsistent
> state.
> 
> The dump path uses the correct pattern with rcu_read_lock() and
> rcu_dereference(). Should the offload path either acquire tcf_lock or use
> a similar RCU-only approach?
>

Re: [net,v6,1/1] net/sched: act_gate: snapshot parameters with RCU on replace

[Jamal Hadi Salim]

On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 12:37 PM Paul Moses <p@1g4.org> wrote:
>
> 1. I don’t think this is reachable, during create, the IDR slot is populated
>    with ERR_PTR(-EBUSY) by tcf_idr_check_alloc(). The real action pointer is
>    only published later by tcf_idr_insert_many(), which runs after init()
>    returns and after tcf_gate_init() has already done:
>
>      rcu_replace_pointer(gact->param, p, ...)
>
>    Both the normal lookup path and the dump walker treat ERR_PTR entries as
>    “not ready”: tcf_idr_search() rejects them and the dump walker skips.
>

Correct.


> 2. offload_act_setup() is currently called with act->tcfa_lock held in both
>    call chains (net/sched/act_api.c and net/sched/cls_api.c). Since
>    gact->tcf_lock aliases common.tcfa_lock, the
>    lockdep_is_held(&gact->tcf_lock) condition in tcf_gate_params_locked()
>    is satisfied.
>

The spinlock will catch it as stated.

The AI is clearly hallucinating..

cheers,
jamal

> Thanks,
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 13th, 2026 at 9:55 AM, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> > email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> >
> > For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
> > ---
> > net/sched: act_gate: snapshot parameters with RCU on replace
> >
> > The gate action can be replaced while the hrtimer callback or dump path is
> > walking the schedule list.
> >
> > Convert the parameters to an RCU-protected snapshot and swap updates under
> > tcf_lock, freeing the previous snapshot via call_rcu(). When REPLACE omits
> > the entry list, preserve the existing schedule so the effective state is
> > unchanged.
> >
> > > diff --git a/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h b/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h
> > > index c1a67149c6b6..5223c00279d5 100644
> > > --- a/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h
> > > +++ b/include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h
> > > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct tcf_gate_params {
> > >     s32                     tcfg_clockid;
> > >     size_t                  num_entries;
> > >     struct list_head        entries;
> > > +   struct rcu_head         rcu;
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  #define GATE_ACT_GATE_OPEN BIT(0)
> > > @@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ struct tcf_gate_params {
> > >
> > >  struct tcf_gate {
> > >     struct tc_action        common;
> > > -   struct tcf_gate_params  param;
> > > +   struct tcf_gate_params __rcu *param;
> > >     u8                      current_gate_status;
> > >     ktime_t                 current_close_time;
> > >     u32                     current_entry_octets;
> > > @@ -51,47 +52,65 @@ struct tcf_gate {
> > >
> > >  #define to_gate(a) ((struct tcf_gate *)a)
> > >
> > > +static inline struct tcf_gate_params *tcf_gate_params_locked(const struct tc_action *a)
> > > +{
> > > +   struct tcf_gate *gact = to_gate(a);
> > > +
> > > +   return rcu_dereference_protected(gact->param,
> > > +                                    lockdep_is_held(&gact->tcf_lock));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static inline s32 tcf_gate_prio(const struct tc_action *a)
> > >  {
> > > +   struct tcf_gate_params *p;
> > >     s32 tcfg_prio;
> > >
> > > -   tcfg_prio = to_gate(a)->param.tcfg_priority;
> > > +   p = tcf_gate_params_locked(a);
> > > +   tcfg_prio = p->tcfg_priority;
> > >
> > >     return tcfg_prio;
> > >  }
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > diff --git a/net/sched/act_gate.c b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> > > index c1f75f272757..60c80e609ec3 100644
> > > --- a/net/sched/act_gate.c
> > > +++ b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > @@ -509,10 +621,9 @@ static int tcf_gate_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a,
> > >     struct nlattr *entry_list;
> > >     struct tcf_t t;
> > >
> > > -   spin_lock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
> > > -   opt.action = gact->tcf_action;
> > > -
> > > -   p = &gact->param;
> > > +   rcu_read_lock();
> > > +   opt.action = READ_ONCE(gact->tcf_action);
> > > +   p = rcu_dereference(gact->param);
> > >
> > >     if (nla_put(skb, TCA_GATE_PARMS, sizeof(opt), &opt))
> > >             goto nla_put_failure;
> > >
> > > @@ -552,12 +663,12 @@ static int tcf_gate_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a,
> > >     tcf_tm_dump(&t, &gact->tcf_tm);
> > >     if (nla_put_64bit(skb, TCA_GATE_TM, sizeof(t), &t, TCA_GATE_PAD))
> > >             goto nla_put_failure;
> > > -   spin_unlock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
> > > +   rcu_read_unlock();
> > >
> > >     return skb->len;
> > >
> > >  nla_put_failure:
> > > -   spin_unlock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
> > > +   rcu_read_unlock();
> > >     nlmsg_trim(skb, b);
> > >     return -1;
> > >  }
> >
> > Can tcf_gate_dump be called before gact->param is initialized?
> >
> > After the conversion to RCU pointers, if tcf_gate_dump is called during
> > action initialization (between tcf_idr_create_from_flags and
> > rcu_replace_pointer in tcf_gate_init), p will be NULL:
> >
> > net/sched/act_gate.c:tcf_gate_init() {
> >     tcf_idr_create_from_flags(...);
> >     ...
> >     // gact->param still NULL here
> >     ...
> >     rcu_replace_pointer(gact->param, p, ...);  // line 517
> > }
> >
> > net/sched/act_gate.c:tcf_gate_dump() {
> >     rcu_read_lock();
> >     p = rcu_dereference(gact->param);  // can be NULL
> >
> >     if (nla_put_u64_64bit(skb, TCA_GATE_BASE_TIME,
> >                           p->tcfg_basetime, TCA_GATE_PAD))  // NULL deref
> > }
> >
> > Before the patch, param was an embedded struct that was zero-initialized,
> > so dump would return valid (if meaningless) data. After the patch, this
> > becomes a NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> > While the tc action framework may prevent dumping partially initialized
> > actions through external synchronization, should this code include a NULL
> > check to make the initialization window safer?
> >
> > The second issue is in the hardware offload path. Looking at
> > net/sched/act_gate.c:tcf_gate_offload_act_setup(), the function calls the
> > accessor helpers without holding tcf_lock:
> >
> > net/sched/act_gate.c:tcf_gate_offload_act_setup() {
> >     // no lock held here
> >     entry->gate.prio = tcf_gate_prio(act);           // line 723
> >     entry->gate.basetime = tcf_gate_basetime(act);
> >     entry->gate.cycletime = tcf_gate_cycletime(act);
> >     ...
> > }
> >
> > include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h:tcf_gate_prio() {
> >     p = tcf_gate_params_locked(a);  // uses rcu_dereference_protected
> >     ...
> > }
> >
> > include/net/tc_act/tc_gate.h:tcf_gate_params_locked() {
> >     return rcu_dereference_protected(gact->param,
> >                                      lockdep_is_held(&gact->tcf_lock));
> > }
> >
> > Does tcf_gate_offload_act_setup violate the locking requirements?
> >
> > The accessor functions all use tcf_gate_params_locked(), which requires
> > tcf_lock to be held (verified via lockdep_is_held). The offload setup
> > function doesn't acquire this lock before calling the accessors.
> >
> > With lockdep enabled, this will trigger warnings. Without lockdep, there's
> > a race where param can be replaced via rcu_replace_pointer while the
> > offload function is reading it, potentially causing reads of inconsistent
> > state.
> >
> > The dump path uses the correct pattern with rcu_read_lock() and
> > rcu_dereference(). Should the offload path either acquire tcf_lock or use
> > a similar RCU-only approach?
> >

Re: [PATCH net v6 1/1] net/sched: act_gate: snapshot parameters with RCU on replace

[Victor Nogueira]

On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 8:39 AM Paul Moses <p@1g4.org> wrote:
>
> The gate action can be replaced while the hrtimer callback or dump path is
> walking the schedule list.
>
> Convert the parameters to an RCU-protected snapshot and swap updates under
> tcf_lock, freeing the previous snapshot via call_rcu(). When REPLACE omits
> the entry list, preserve the existing schedule so the effective state is
> unchanged.
> [...]
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_gate.c b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> index c1f75f2727576..60c80e609ec3d 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_gate.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> [...]
> @@ -56,11 +59,10 @@ static void gate_start_timer(struct tcf_gate *gact, ktime_t start)
>  {
>         ktime_t expires;
>
> -       expires = hrtimer_get_expires(&gact->hitimer);
> -       if (expires == 0)
> -               expires = KTIME_MAX;
> -
> -       start = min_t(ktime_t, start, expires);
> +       if (hrtimer_active(&gact->hitimer)) {
> +               expires = hrtimer_get_expires(&gact->hitimer);
> +               start = min_t(ktime_t, start, expires);
> +       }

Is this change really necessary?

> [...]
>  static int parse_gate_list(struct nlattr *list_attr,
>                            struct tcf_gate_params *sched,
>                            struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> @@ -261,7 +294,6 @@ static int parse_gate_list(struct nlattr *list_attr,
>         }
>
>         sched->num_entries = i;
> -
>         return i;

Removing this line also seems unnecessary.

> [...]
> +static void gate_setup_timer(struct tcf_gate *gact, s32 clockid,
> +                            enum tk_offsets tko)
> +{
> +       WRITE_ONCE(gact->tk_offset, tko);

Why do you need this WRITE_ONCE?

>  static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> [...]
> @@ -366,6 +407,60 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> [...]
> +       if (ret != ACT_P_CREATED) {
> [...]
> +               if (use_old_entries) {
> +                       err = tcf_gate_copy_entries(p, cur_p, extack);
> +                       if (!err && !tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME])

This check for TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME seems unnecessary.
If I understand your code correctly, cycletime will be overwritten
further down if TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME was specified.

> +                               cycletime = cur_p->tcfg_cycletime;
> [...]
> @@ -434,33 +532,47 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> [...]
> -chain_put:
> +unlock:
>         spin_unlock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
>
> +err_free:
> +       release_entry_list(&p->entries);
> +       kfree(p);
> +release_idr:
>         if (goto_ch)
>                 tcf_chain_put_by_act(goto_ch);
> -release_idr:
> [...]

This looks weird.
You will go to the release_idr label when tcf_action_check_ctrlact fails,
so the "if (goto_ch)" part of the code will be reached in that code path.
I believe it would be better to keep the "chain_put" label and keep
"release_idr" below it (as it was before your change).
Something like:

chain_put:
        if (goto_ch)
                tcf_chain_put_by_act(goto_ch);
release_idr:
        ...

cheers,
Victor

Re: [PATCH net v6 1/1] net/sched: act_gate: snapshot parameters with RCU on replace

[Paul Moses]

1. hrtimer_get_expires() just returns the stored node.expires and
   hrtimer_cancel() doesn’t clear it, so expires==0 is not a reliable
   inactivity test. Logic was that although I detected no observable
   behavior difference, relying on stale expires could theoretically
   cause infrequent subtle intermittent misses of intended behavior.
   It's maybe more appropriate to leave it alone for stable or at
   least not in this patch/series?

2. Agreed. This was a mistake.

3. It's the same pattern used in sch_taprio and it's documented in
   Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: the compiler may merge/discard/
   invent/reorder plain accesses and READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() exist to
   make intentional lockless shared variable accesses well defined.
   Since tk_offset is read with READ_ONCE() outside tcf_lock, the writer
   uses WRITE_ONCE() to pair with that lockless read.

4. Agreed, I’ll remove the redundant guard.

5. goto_ch is initialized to NULL and tcf_action_check_ctrlact() only sets
   it on success, so the current code is safe, but I agree that it's confusing,
   I'll improve.

Thanks
Paul



On Sunday, February 15th, 2026 at 2:45 PM, Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 8:39 AM Paul Moses <p@1g4.org> wrote:
> >
> > The gate action can be replaced while the hrtimer callback or dump path is
> > walking the schedule list.
> >
> > Convert the parameters to an RCU-protected snapshot and swap updates under
> > tcf_lock, freeing the previous snapshot via call_rcu(). When REPLACE omits
> > the entry list, preserve the existing schedule so the effective state is
> > unchanged.
> > [...]
> > diff --git a/net/sched/act_gate.c b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> > index c1f75f2727576..60c80e609ec3d 100644
> > --- a/net/sched/act_gate.c
> > +++ b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> > [...]
> > @@ -56,11 +59,10 @@ static void gate_start_timer(struct tcf_gate *gact, ktime_t start)
> >  {
> >         ktime_t expires;
> >
> > -       expires = hrtimer_get_expires(&gact->hitimer);
> > -       if (expires == 0)
> > -               expires = KTIME_MAX;
> > -
> > -       start = min_t(ktime_t, start, expires);
> > +       if (hrtimer_active(&gact->hitimer)) {
> > +               expires = hrtimer_get_expires(&gact->hitimer);
> > +               start = min_t(ktime_t, start, expires);
> > +       }
> 
> Is this change really necessary?
> 
> > [...]
> >  static int parse_gate_list(struct nlattr *list_attr,
> >                            struct tcf_gate_params *sched,
> >                            struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > @@ -261,7 +294,6 @@ static int parse_gate_list(struct nlattr *list_attr,
> >         }
> >
> >         sched->num_entries = i;
> > -
> >         return i;
> 
> Removing this line also seems unnecessary.
> 
> > [...]
> > +static void gate_setup_timer(struct tcf_gate *gact, s32 clockid,
> > +                            enum tk_offsets tko)
> > +{
> > +       WRITE_ONCE(gact->tk_offset, tko);
> 
> Why do you need this WRITE_ONCE?
> 
> >  static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> > [...]
> > @@ -366,6 +407,60 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> > [...]
> > +       if (ret != ACT_P_CREATED) {
> > [...]
> > +               if (use_old_entries) {
> > +                       err = tcf_gate_copy_entries(p, cur_p, extack);
> > +                       if (!err && !tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME])
> 
> This check for TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME seems unnecessary.
> If I understand your code correctly, cycletime will be overwritten
> further down if TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME was specified.
> 
> > +                               cycletime = cur_p->tcfg_cycletime;
> > [...]
> > @@ -434,33 +532,47 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> > [...]
> > -chain_put:
> > +unlock:
> >         spin_unlock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
> >
> > +err_free:
> > +       release_entry_list(&p->entries);
> > +       kfree(p);
> > +release_idr:
> >         if (goto_ch)
> >                 tcf_chain_put_by_act(goto_ch);
> > -release_idr:
> > [...]
> 
> This looks weird.
> You will go to the release_idr label when tcf_action_check_ctrlact fails,
> so the "if (goto_ch)" part of the code will be reached in that code path.
> I believe it would be better to keep the "chain_put" label and keep
> "release_idr" below it (as it was before your change).
> Something like:
> 
> chain_put:
>         if (goto_ch)
>                 tcf_chain_put_by_act(goto_ch);
> release_idr:
>         ...
> 
> cheers,
> Victor
>

Re: [PATCH net v6 1/1] net/sched: act_gate: snapshot parameters with RCU on replace

[Victor Nogueira]

On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 8:59 PM Paul Moses <p@1g4.org> wrote:
> 1. hrtimer_get_expires() just returns the stored node.expires and
>    hrtimer_cancel() doesn’t clear it, so expires==0 is not a reliable
>    inactivity test. Logic was that although I detected no observable
>    behavior difference, relying on stale expires could theoretically
>    cause infrequent subtle intermittent misses of intended behavior.
>    It's maybe more appropriate to leave it alone for stable or at
>    least not in this patch/series?

Yes, even if it is an issue, we should leave it for another patchset.

> [...]
> 3. It's the same pattern used in sch_taprio and it's documented in
>    Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: the compiler may merge/discard/
>    invent/reorder plain accesses and READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() exist to
>    make intentional lockless shared variable accesses well defined.
>    Since tk_offset is read with READ_ONCE() outside tcf_lock, the writer
>    uses WRITE_ONCE() to pair with that lockless read.

Ok.

cheers,
Victor