From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCCFA13DDAA; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 20:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771360991; cv=none; b=NnuvqL9nutVgnOhNIPGEg0FaekKYv+t5riLHe9ruPW0YHr2DZyUWh041HcFuCdA6bwmSpAV9lLRfZJECKlpsNOKYu3ZQ9kkYc5wFB65LmtT8yhdUqsjaz76xBAatK2eqnciiUzxoDWkviEAQWYLa63iJx23a8ipN3IaXW22KJ20= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771360991; c=relaxed/simple; bh=w/ORb7x36/StQtnrn4fx6TsCERPaqLk45hpVnBK2r3Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=s285KpQT/xJUgd/5Oe3Jc7Q3zFNlxta9Qkr8jaNjckSfV4G48WkwTxEp1uDdfUylUxmwF6yYPCNt9LzM8uSsJwAs57TzOWT1ZieEl5UUWGdEBiKGm5NxtHVdXfiN5jIWfA1j15niVeZs029Plui10BbrX2CKPOau78wtTC7gnjo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=jrxtQLbT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="jrxtQLbT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 245D6C4CEF7; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 20:43:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1771360991; bh=w/ORb7x36/StQtnrn4fx6TsCERPaqLk45hpVnBK2r3Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jrxtQLbT2oAxnZGjbcP/k8IeijbUQlncMBfVaHVlCz6y4/YElWLt2fjHQ9U0zWALs 7ZjmAj4n/jb5f4G4p4R3kEqJ2L8m1NZH2feVFBy82EvopkIGAiX9lZo2GCVp3z7cSu olwSnhd00dWZIaPo0AuKuY7oqoGVWSdwjkF6+gM4= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Xuewen Yan , Baolin Wang , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Bartosz Golaszewski , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.15 10/39] gpio: sprd: Change sprd_gpio lock to raw_spin_lock Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 21:31:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20260217200003.324920845@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260217200002.929083107@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260217200002.929083107@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Xuewen Yan [ Upstream commit 96313fcc1f062ba239f4832c9eff685da6c51c99 ] There was a lockdep warning in sprd_gpio: [ 6.258269][T329@C6] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 6.258270][T329@C6] 6.18.0-android17-0-g30527ad7aaae-ab00009-4k #1 Tainted: G W OE [ 6.258272][T329@C6] ----------------------------- [ 6.258273][T329@C6] modprobe/329 is trying to lock: [ 6.258275][T329@C6] ffffff8081c91690 (&sprd_gpio->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: sprd_gpio_irq_unmask+0x4c/0xa4 [gpio_sprd] [ 6.258282][T329@C6] other info that might help us debug this: [ 6.258283][T329@C6] context-{5:5} [ 6.258285][T329@C6] 3 locks held by modprobe/329: [ 6.258286][T329@C6] #0: ffffff808baca108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xc4/0x204 [ 6.258295][T329@C6] #1: ffffff80965e7240 (request_class#4){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0x1cc/0x82c [ 6.258304][T329@C6] #2: ffffff80965e70c8 (lock_class#4){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq+0x21c/0x82c [ 6.258313][T329@C6] stack backtrace: [ 6.258314][T329@C6] CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 329 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W OE 6.18.0-android17-0-g30527ad7aaae-ab00009-4k #1 PREEMPT 3ad5b0f45741a16e5838da790706e16ceb6717df [ 6.258316][T329@C6] Tainted: [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 6.258317][T329@C6] Hardware name: Unisoc UMS9632-base Board (DT) [ 6.258318][T329@C6] Call trace: [ 6.258318][T329@C6] show_stack+0x20/0x30 (C) [ 6.258321][T329@C6] __dump_stack+0x28/0x3c [ 6.258324][T329@C6] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xf0 [ 6.258326][T329@C6] dump_stack+0x18/0x3c [ 6.258329][T329@C6] __lock_acquire+0x824/0x2c28 [ 6.258331][T329@C6] lock_acquire+0x148/0x2cc [ 6.258333][T329@C6] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x6c/0xb4 [ 6.258334][T329@C6] sprd_gpio_irq_unmask+0x4c/0xa4 [gpio_sprd 814535e93c6d8e0853c45c02eab0fa88a9da6487] [ 6.258337][T329@C6] irq_startup+0x238/0x350 [ 6.258340][T329@C6] __setup_irq+0x504/0x82c [ 6.258342][T329@C6] request_threaded_irq+0x118/0x184 [ 6.258344][T329@C6] devm_request_threaded_irq+0x94/0x120 [ 6.258347][T329@C6] sc8546_init_irq+0x114/0x170 [sc8546_charger 223586ccafc27439f7db4f95b0c8e6e882349a99] [ 6.258352][T329@C6] sc8546_charger_probe+0x53c/0x5a0 [sc8546_charger 223586ccafc27439f7db4f95b0c8e6e882349a99] [ 6.258358][T329@C6] i2c_device_probe+0x2c8/0x350 [ 6.258361][T329@C6] really_probe+0x1a8/0x46c [ 6.258363][T329@C6] __driver_probe_device+0xa4/0x10c [ 6.258366][T329@C6] driver_probe_device+0x44/0x1b4 [ 6.258369][T329@C6] __driver_attach+0xd0/0x204 [ 6.258371][T329@C6] bus_for_each_dev+0x10c/0x168 [ 6.258373][T329@C6] driver_attach+0x2c/0x3c [ 6.258376][T329@C6] bus_add_driver+0x154/0x29c [ 6.258378][T329@C6] driver_register+0x70/0x10c [ 6.258381][T329@C6] i2c_register_driver+0x48/0xc8 [ 6.258384][T329@C6] init_module+0x28/0xfd8 [sc8546_charger 223586ccafc27439f7db4f95b0c8e6e882349a99] [ 6.258389][T329@C6] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x42c [ 6.258392][T329@C6] do_init_module+0x60/0x254 [ 6.258395][T329@C6] load_module+0x1054/0x1220 [ 6.258397][T329@C6] __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x240/0x35c [ 6.258400][T329@C6] invoke_syscall+0x60/0xec [ 6.258402][T329@C6] el0_svc_common+0xb0/0xe4 [ 6.258405][T329@C6] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x30 [ 6.258407][T329@C6] el0_svc+0x54/0x1c4 [ 6.258409][T329@C6] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x68/0xdc [ 6.258411][T329@C6] el0t_64_sync+0x1c4/0x1c8 This is because the spin_lock would change to rt_mutex in PREEMPT_RT, however the sprd_gpio->lock would use in hard-irq, this is unsafe. So change the spin_lock_t to raw_spin_lock_t to use the spinlock in hard-irq. Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260126094209.9855-1-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com [Bartosz: tweaked the commit message] Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/gpio/gpio-sprd.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sprd.c index 9dd9dabb579e2..b2b28c6877f2f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sprd.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sprd.c @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct sprd_gpio { struct gpio_chip chip; void __iomem *base; - spinlock_t lock; + raw_spinlock_t lock; int irq; }; @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void sprd_gpio_update(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, unsigned long flags; u32 tmp; - spin_lock_irqsave(&sprd_gpio->lock, flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sprd_gpio->lock, flags); tmp = readl_relaxed(base + reg); if (val) @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static void sprd_gpio_update(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, tmp &= ~BIT(SPRD_GPIO_BIT(offset)); writel_relaxed(tmp, base + reg); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sprd_gpio->lock, flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sprd_gpio->lock, flags); } static int sprd_gpio_read(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, u16 reg) @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static int sprd_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (IS_ERR(sprd_gpio->base)) return PTR_ERR(sprd_gpio->base); - spin_lock_init(&sprd_gpio->lock); + raw_spin_lock_init(&sprd_gpio->lock); sprd_gpio->chip.label = dev_name(&pdev->dev); sprd_gpio->chip.ngpio = SPRD_GPIO_NR; -- 2.51.0