public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: yi.zhang@huawei.com,libaokun1@huawei.com,ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,tytso@mit.edu
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: drop extent cache after doing PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 13:44:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026022415-penny-handcart-e6fa@gregkh> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 6d882ea3b0931b43530d44149b79fcd4ffc13030
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026022415-penny-handcart-e6fa@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 6d882ea3b0931b43530d44149b79fcd4ffc13030 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 18:32:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: drop extent cache after doing PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout

When splitting an unwritten extent in the middle and converting it to
initialized in ext4_split_extent() with the EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT and
EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flags set, it could leave a stale unwritten extent.

Assume we have an unwritten file and buffered write in the middle of it
without dioread_nolock enabled, it will allocate blocks as written
extent.

       0  A      B  N
       [UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent      U: unwritten extent
       [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
       [--DDDDDDDD--]                     D: valid data
          |<-  ->| ----> this range needs to be initialized

ext4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with
EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but
ext4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack
of space. It zeroout B to N and leave the entire extent as unwritten.

       0  A      B  N
       [UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent
       [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
       [--DDDDDDDDZZ]                     Z: zeroed data

ext4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with
EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and
leave an written extent from A to N.

       0  A      B  N
       [UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent      W: written extent
       [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
       [--DDDDDDDDZZ]

Finally ext4_map_create_blocks() only insert extent A to B to the extent
status tree, and leave an stale unwritten extent in the status tree.

       0  A      B  N
       [UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent      W: written extent
       [UUWWWWWWWWUU] extent status tree
       [--DDDDDDDDZZ]

Fix this issue by always cached extent status entry after zeroing out
the second part.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20251129103247.686136-7-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index be9fd2ab8667..1094e4923451 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -3319,8 +3319,16 @@ static struct ext4_ext_path *ext4_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle,
 			 * extent length and ext4_split_extent() split will the
 			 * first half again.
 			 */
-			if (split_flag & EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1)
+			if (split_flag & EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1) {
+				/*
+				 * Drop extent cache to prevent stale unwritten
+				 * extents remaining after zeroing out.
+				 */
+				ext4_es_remove_extent(inode,
+					le32_to_cpu(zero_ex.ee_block),
+					ext4_ext_get_actual_len(&zero_ex));
 				goto fix_extent_len;
+			}
 
 			/* update the extent length and mark as initialized */
 			ex->ee_len = cpu_to_le16(ee_len);


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-02-24 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026022415-penny-handcart-e6fa@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox