public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] clk: microchip: mpfs-ccc: fix out of bounds access during output registration
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 23:24:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260225-thrive-endless-3168e0b0f916@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260225-cache-nebulizer-2f3669074fa4@spud>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3078 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 11:14:47PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 05:56:53PM -0500, Brian Masney wrote:
> > Hi Conor,
> > 
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 09:35:25AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > UBSAN reported an out of bounds access during registration of the last
> > > two outputs. This out of bounds access occurs because space is only
> > > allocated in the hws array for two PLLs and the four output dividers
> > > that each has, but the defined IDs contain two DLLS and their two
> > > outputs each, which are not supported by the driver. The ID order is
> > > PLLs -> DLLs -> PLL outputs -> DLL outputs. Decrement the PLL output IDs
> > > by two while adding them to the array to avoid the problem.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: d39fb172760e ("clk: microchip: add PolarFire SoC fabric clock support")
> > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > > ---
> > > CC: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > > CC: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>
> > > CC: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> > > CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> > > CC: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
> > > CC: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > > CC: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
> > > CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c
> > > index 3a3ea2d142f8a..54cfbb8be8ab5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c
> > > @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static int mpfs_ccc_register_outputs(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_ccc_out_hw_
> > >  			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register clock id: %d\n",
> > >  					     out_hw->id);
> > >  
> > > -		data->hw_data.hws[out_hw->id] = &out_hw->divider.hw;
> > > +		data->hw_data.hws[out_hw->id - 2] = &out_hw->divider.hw;
> > 
> > What happens when / if the DLLs are supported by this driver in the
> > future? This seems like a trap for the future.
> > 
> > According to include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h, there are
> > only 16 clock IDs. Could hws be initialized to have enough room for all
> > 16 structures, and would it be ok if it was a sparse array?
> > 
> > At the very least, I think it would be nice to include a comment here.
> 
> I think I'd rather add a comment, I know it's at most only 24 extra
> allocations, but just feels bad to do it.

I'll add this, maybe on application.

@@ -234,6 +234,10 @@ static int mpfs_ccc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        unsigned int num_clks;
        int ret;
 
+       /*
+        * If DLLs get added here, mpfs_ccc_register_outputs() currently packs
+        * sparse clock IDs in the hws array
+        */
        num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(mpfs_ccc_pll_clks) + ARRAY_SIZE(mpfs_ccc_pll0out_clks) +
                   ARRAY_SIZE(mpfs_ccc_pll1out_clks);

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-25 23:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-24  9:35 [PATCH v1] clk: microchip: mpfs-ccc: fix out of bounds access during output registration Conor Dooley
2026-02-25 22:56 ` Brian Masney
2026-02-25 23:14   ` Conor Dooley
2026-02-25 23:24     ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-02-26 15:38       ` Brian Masney
2026-03-02 17:13         ` Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260225-thrive-endless-3168e0b0f916@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox