From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Rahul Sharma <black.hawk@163.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, Guangwu Zhang <guazhang@redhat.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y] dm-verity: disable recursive forward error correction
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 21:04:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260226050440.GA2302@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260226043500.3945988-1-black.hawk@163.com>
[+Cc dm-devel@lists.linux.dev]
On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 12:35:00PM +0800, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit d9f3e47d3fae0c101d9094bc956ed24e7a0ee801 ]
>
> There are two problems with the recursive correction:
>
> 1. It may cause denial-of-service. In fec_read_bufs, there is a loop that
> has 253 iterations. For each iteration, we may call verity_hash_for_block
> recursively. There is a limit of 4 nested recursions - that means that
> there may be at most 253^4 (4 billion) iterations. Red Hat QE team
> actually created an image that pushes dm-verity to this limit - and this
> image just makes the udev-worker process get stuck in the 'D' state.
>
> 2. It doesn't work. In fec_read_bufs we store data into the variable
> "fio->bufs", but fio bufs is shared between recursive invocations, if
> "verity_hash_for_block" invoked correction recursively, it would
> overwrite partially filled fio->bufs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Guangwu Zhang <guazhang@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> [ The context change is due to the commit bdf253d580d7
> ("dm-verity: remove support for asynchronous hashes")
> in v6.18 which is irrelevant to the logic of this patch. ]
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <black.hawk@163.com>
Looks good. The upstream patch incremented the dm target version number
too, but skipping that part looks good. This further shows that the dm
subsystem's version numbers don't really work.
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-26 5:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-26 4:35 [PATCH 6.12.y] dm-verity: disable recursive forward error correction Rahul Sharma
2026-02-26 5:04 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260226050440.GA2302@sol \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=black.hawk@163.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guazhang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox