public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Rahul Sharma <black.hawk@163.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, Guangwu Zhang <guazhang@redhat.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y] dm-verity: disable recursive forward error correction
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 21:04:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260226050440.GA2302@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260226043500.3945988-1-black.hawk@163.com>

[+Cc dm-devel@lists.linux.dev]

On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 12:35:00PM +0800, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit d9f3e47d3fae0c101d9094bc956ed24e7a0ee801 ]
> 
> There are two problems with the recursive correction:
> 
> 1. It may cause denial-of-service. In fec_read_bufs, there is a loop that
> has 253 iterations. For each iteration, we may call verity_hash_for_block
> recursively. There is a limit of 4 nested recursions - that means that
> there may be at most 253^4 (4 billion) iterations. Red Hat QE team
> actually created an image that pushes dm-verity to this limit - and this
> image just makes the udev-worker process get stuck in the 'D' state.
> 
> 2. It doesn't work. In fec_read_bufs we store data into the variable
> "fio->bufs", but fio bufs is shared between recursive invocations, if
> "verity_hash_for_block" invoked correction recursively, it would
> overwrite partially filled fio->bufs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Guangwu Zhang <guazhang@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> [ The context change is due to the commit bdf253d580d7
> ("dm-verity: remove support for asynchronous hashes")
> in v6.18 which is irrelevant to the logic of this patch. ]
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <black.hawk@163.com>

Looks good.  The upstream patch incremented the dm target version number
too, but skipping that part looks good.  This further shows that the dm
subsystem's version numbers don't really work.

- Eric

      reply	other threads:[~2026-02-26  5:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-26  4:35 [PATCH 6.12.y] dm-verity: disable recursive forward error correction Rahul Sharma
2026-02-26  5:04 ` Eric Biggers [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260226050440.GA2302@sol \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=black.hawk@163.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guazhang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox