From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com
Cc: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>,
stable@kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: FAILED: Patch "ext4: don't set EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT when splitting before submitting I/O" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 20:15:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260301011542.1669353-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.18-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Thanks,
Sasha
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From feaf2a80e78f89ee8a3464126077ba8683b62791 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 18:32:35 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: don't set EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT when splitting before
submitting I/O
When allocating blocks during within-EOF DIO and writeback with
dioread_nolock enabled, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO was set to split an
existing large unwritten extent. However, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT was
set when calling ext4_split_convert_extents(), which may potentially
result in stale data issues.
Assume we have an unwritten extent, and then DIO writes the second half.
[UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
|<- ->| ----> dio write this range
First, ext4_iomap_alloc() call ext4_map_blocks() with
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO, EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNWRIT_EXT and
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE flags set. ext4_map_blocks() find this extent and
call ext4_split_convert_extents() with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT and the
above flags set.
Then, ext4_split_convert_extents() calls ext4_split_extent() with
EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT, EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 and EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2
flags set, and it calls ext4_split_extent_at() to split the second half
with EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2, EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT1, EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT
and EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 flags set. However, ext4_split_extent_at()
failed to insert extent since a temporary lack -ENOSPC. It zeroes out
the first half but convert the entire on-disk extent to written since
the EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set, but left the second half as unwritten
in the extent status tree.
[0000000000SSSSSS] data S: stale data, 0: zeroed
[WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent
[WWWWWWWWWWUUUUUU] extent status tree
Finally, if the DIO failed to write data to the disk, the stale data in
the second half will be exposed once the cached extent entry is gone.
Fix this issue by not passing EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT when splitting
an unwritten extent before submitting I/O, and make
ext4_split_convert_extents() to zero out the entire extent range
to zero for this case, and also mark the extent in the extent status
tree for consistency.
Fixes: b8a8684502a0 ("ext4: Introduce FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE flag for fallocate")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Message-ID: <20251129103247.686136-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 1fee84ea20af1..91b56de60c905 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -3746,15 +3746,19 @@ static struct ext4_ext_path *ext4_split_convert_extents(handle_t *handle,
/* Convert to unwritten */
if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN) {
split_flag |= EXT4_EXT_DATA_ENTIRE_VALID1;
- /* Convert to initialized */
- } else if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT) {
+ /* Split the existing unwritten extent */
+ } else if (flags & (EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNWRIT_EXT |
+ EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT)) {
/*
* It is safe to convert extent to initialized via explicit
* zeroout only if extent is fully inside i_size or new_size.
*/
split_flag |= ee_block + ee_len <= eof_block ?
EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT : 0;
- split_flag |= (EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2 | EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2);
+ split_flag |= EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNWRIT2;
+ /* Convert to initialized */
+ if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT)
+ split_flag |= EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2;
}
flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE;
return ext4_split_extent(handle, inode, path, map, split_flag, flags,
@@ -3930,7 +3934,7 @@ ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
/* get_block() before submitting IO, split the extent */
if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_SPLIT_NOMERGE) {
path = ext4_split_convert_extents(handle, inode, map, path,
- flags | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT, allocated);
+ flags, allocated);
if (IS_ERR(path))
return path;
/*
--
2.51.0
reply other threads:[~2026-03-01 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260301011542.1669353-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox