From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com
Cc: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>,
stable@kernel.org, Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: FAILED: Patch "ext4: drop extent cache after doing PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 20:21:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260301012140.1677719-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Thanks,
Sasha
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 6d882ea3b0931b43530d44149b79fcd4ffc13030 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 18:32:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: drop extent cache after doing PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout
When splitting an unwritten extent in the middle and converting it to
initialized in ext4_split_extent() with the EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT and
EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flags set, it could leave a stale unwritten extent.
Assume we have an unwritten file and buffered write in the middle of it
without dioread_nolock enabled, it will allocate blocks as written
extent.
0 A B N
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDD--] D: valid data
|<- ->| ----> this range needs to be initialized
ext4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with
EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but
ext4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack
of space. It zeroout B to N and leave the entire extent as unwritten.
0 A B N
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDDZZ] Z: zeroed data
ext4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with
EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and
leave an written extent from A to N.
0 A B N
[UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDDZZ]
Finally ext4_map_create_blocks() only insert extent A to B to the extent
status tree, and leave an stale unwritten extent in the status tree.
0 A B N
[UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent
[UUWWWWWWWWUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDDZZ]
Fix this issue by always cached extent status entry after zeroing out
the second part.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20251129103247.686136-7-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index be9fd2ab86679..1094e49234513 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -3319,8 +3319,16 @@ static struct ext4_ext_path *ext4_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle,
* extent length and ext4_split_extent() split will the
* first half again.
*/
- if (split_flag & EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1)
+ if (split_flag & EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1) {
+ /*
+ * Drop extent cache to prevent stale unwritten
+ * extents remaining after zeroing out.
+ */
+ ext4_es_remove_extent(inode,
+ le32_to_cpu(zero_ex.ee_block),
+ ext4_ext_get_actual_len(&zero_ex));
goto fix_extent_len;
+ }
/* update the extent length and mark as initialized */
ex->ee_len = cpu_to_le16(ee_len);
--
2.51.0
reply other threads:[~2026-03-01 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260301012140.1677719-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox