FAILED: Patch "ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree

FAILED: Patch "ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree

[Sasha Levin]

The patch below does not apply to the 6.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

Thanks,
Sasha

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 94a8cea54cd935c54fa2fba70354757c0fc245e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:19:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown

fstests test generic/388 occasionally reproduces a warning in
ext4_put_super() associated with the dirty clusters count:

  WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 76064 at fs/ext4/super.c:1324 ext4_put_super+0x48c/0x590 [ext4]

Tracing the failure shows that the warning fires due to an
s_dirtyclusters_counter value of -1. IOW, this appears to be a
spurious decrement as opposed to some sort of leak. Further tracing
of the dirty cluster count deltas and an LLM scan of the resulting
output identified the cause as a double decrement in the error path
between ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() and the caller
ext4_mb_new_blocks().

First, note that generic/388 is a shutdown vs. fsstress test and so
produces a random set of operations and shutdown injections. In the
problematic case, the shutdown triggers an error return from the
ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() call(s) made from
ext4_mb_mark_context(). The changed value is non-zero at this point,
so ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() does not exit after the error
bubbles up from ext4_mb_mark_context(). Instead, the former
decrements both cluster counters and returns the error up to
ext4_mb_new_blocks(). The latter falls into the !ar->len out path
which decrements the dirty clusters counter a second time, creating
the inconsistency.

To avoid this problem and simplify ownership of the cluster
reservation in this codepath, lift the counter reduction to a single
place in the caller. This makes it more clear that
ext4_mb_new_blocks() is responsible for acquiring cluster
reservation (via ext4_claim_free_clusters()) in the !delalloc case
as well as releasing it, regardless of whether it ends up consumed
or returned due to failure.

Fixes: 0087d9fb3f29 ("ext4: Fix s_dirty_blocks_counter if block allocation failed with nodelalloc")
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260113171905.118284-1-bfoster@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c |  2 +-
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c      | 21 +++++----------------
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
index a9416b20ff64c..4abb40d4561ce 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ test_mark_diskspace_used_range(struct kunit *test,
 
 	bitmap = mbt_ctx_bitmap(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP);
 	memset(bitmap, 0, sb->s_blocksize);
-	ret = ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(ac, NULL, 0);
+	ret = ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(ac, NULL);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
 
 	max = EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb);
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index de4cacb740b33..dd29558ad753b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -4186,8 +4186,7 @@ ext4_mb_mark_context(handle_t *handle, struct super_block *sb, bool state,
  * Returns 0 if success or error code
  */
 static noinline_for_stack int
-ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
-				handle_t *handle, unsigned int reserv_clstrs)
+ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, handle_t *handle)
 {
 	struct ext4_group_desc *gdp;
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi;
@@ -4242,13 +4241,6 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	BUG_ON(changed != ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len);
 #endif
 	percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_freeclusters_counter, ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len);
-	/*
-	 * Now reduce the dirty block count also. Should not go negative
-	 */
-	if (!(ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_DELALLOC_RESERVED))
-		/* release all the reserved blocks if non delalloc */
-		percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyclusters_counter,
-				   reserv_clstrs);
 
 	return err;
 }
@@ -6333,7 +6325,7 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks(handle_t *handle,
 			ext4_mb_pa_put_free(ac);
 	}
 	if (likely(ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_FOUND)) {
-		*errp = ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(ac, handle, reserv_clstrs);
+		*errp = ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(ac, handle);
 		if (*errp) {
 			ext4_discard_allocated_blocks(ac);
 			goto errout;
@@ -6364,12 +6356,9 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks(handle_t *handle,
 out:
 	if (inquota && ar->len < inquota)
 		dquot_free_block(ar->inode, EXT4_C2B(sbi, inquota - ar->len));
-	if (!ar->len) {
-		if ((ar->flags & EXT4_MB_DELALLOC_RESERVED) == 0)
-			/* release all the reserved blocks if non delalloc */
-			percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyclusters_counter,
-						reserv_clstrs);
-	}
+	/* release any reserved blocks */
+	if (reserv_clstrs)
+		percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyclusters_counter, reserv_clstrs);
 
 	trace_ext4_allocate_blocks(ar, (unsigned long long)block);
 
-- 
2.51.0