public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: FAILED: Patch "xfs: delete attr leaf freemap entries when empty" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 20:51:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260301015156.1718329-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

Thanks,
Sasha

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 6f13c1d2a6271c2e73226864a0e83de2770b6f34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:27:30 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: delete attr leaf freemap entries when empty

Back in commit 2a2b5932db6758 ("xfs: fix attr leaf header freemap.size
underflow"), Brian Foster observed that it's possible for a small
freemap at the end of the end of the xattr entries array to experience
a size underflow when subtracting the space consumed by an expansion of
the entries array.  There are only three freemap entries, which means
that it is not a complete index of all free space in the leaf block.

This code can leave behind a zero-length freemap entry with a nonzero
base.  Subsequent setxattr operations can increase the base up to the
point that it overlaps with another freemap entry.  This isn't in and of
itself a problem because the code in _leaf_add that finds free space
ignores any freemap entry with zero size.

However, there's another bug in the freemap update code in _leaf_add,
which is that it fails to update a freemap entry that begins midway
through the xattr entry that was just appended to the array.  That can
result in the freemap containing two entries with the same base but
different sizes (0 for the "pushed-up" entry, nonzero for the entry
that's actually tracking free space).  A subsequent _leaf_add can then
allocate xattr namevalue entries on top of the entries array, leading to
data loss.  But fixing that is for later.

For now, eliminate the possibility of confusion by zeroing out the base
of any freemap entry that has zero size.  Because the freemap is not
intended to be a complete index of free space, a subsequent failure to
find any free space for a new xattr will trigger block compaction, which
regenerates the freemap.

It looks like this bug has been in the codebase for quite a long time.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v2.6.12
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f415 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
index 6061230b17ef5..c8c9737f04563 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
@@ -1580,6 +1580,19 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_add_work(
 				min_t(uint16_t, ichdr->freemap[i].size,
 						sizeof(xfs_attr_leaf_entry_t));
 		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Don't leave zero-length freemaps with nonzero base lying
+		 * around, because we don't want the code in _remove that
+		 * matches on base address to get confused and create
+		 * overlapping freemaps.  If we end up with no freemap entries
+		 * then the next _add will compact the leaf block and
+		 * regenerate the freemaps.
+		 */
+		if (ichdr->freemap[i].size == 0 && ichdr->freemap[i].base > 0) {
+			ichdr->freemap[i].base = 0;
+			ichdr->holes = 1;
+		}
 	}
 	ichdr->usedbytes += xfs_attr_leaf_entsize(leaf, args->index);
 }
-- 
2.51.0





                 reply	other threads:[~2026-03-01  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260301015156.1718329-1-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox