[PATCH v4 6/6] powerpc64/bpf: fix kfunc call support

[Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>]

Commit 61688a82e047 ("powerpc/bpf: enable kfunc call") inadvertently
enabled kfunc call support for 32-bit powerpc but that support will
not be possible until ABI mismatch between 32-bit powerpc and eBPF is
handled in 32-bit powerpc JIT code. Till then, advertise support only
for 64-bit powerpc. Also, in powerpc ABI, caller needs to extend the
arguments properly based on signedness. The JIT code is responsible
for handling this explicitly for kfunc calls as verifier can't handle
this for each architecture-specific ABI needs. But this was not taken
care of while kfunc call support was enabled for powerpc. Fix it by
handling this with bpf_jit_find_kfunc_model() and using zero_extend()
& sign_extend() helper functions.

Fixes: 61688a82e047 ("powerpc/bpf: enable kfunc call")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
---

Changes in v4:
- Fixed src_reg usage in zero_extend() helper - reported by
  bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org.

Changes in v3:
- New patch to fix kfunc call ABI issue on powerpc while passing arguments.


 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c   |   2 +-
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 85457bcb2040..a62a9a92b7b5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_subprog_tailcalls(void)
 
 bool bpf_jit_supports_kfunc_call(void)
 {
-	return true;
+	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64);
 }
 
 bool bpf_jit_supports_arena(void)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 04e76440d1ad..c5e26d231cd5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -499,6 +499,83 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int zero_extend(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 src_reg, u32 dst_reg, u32 size)
+{
+	switch (size) {
+	case 1:
+		 /* zero-extend 8 bits into 64 bits */
+		EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLDICL(dst_reg, src_reg, 0, 56));
+		return 0;
+	case 2:
+		 /* zero-extend 16 bits into 64 bits */
+		EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLDICL(dst_reg, src_reg, 0, 48));
+		return 0;
+	case 4:
+		 /* zero-extend 32 bits into 64 bits */
+		EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLDICL(dst_reg, src_reg, 0, 32));
+		fallthrough;
+	case 8:
+		/* Nothing to do */
+		return 0;
+	default:
+		return -1;
+	}
+}
+
+static int sign_extend(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 src_reg, u32 dst_reg, u32 size)
+{
+	switch (size) {
+	case 1:
+		 /* sign-extend 8 bits into 64 bits */
+		EMIT(PPC_RAW_EXTSB(dst_reg, src_reg));
+		return 0;
+	case 2:
+		 /* sign-extend 16 bits into 64 bits */
+		EMIT(PPC_RAW_EXTSH(dst_reg, src_reg));
+		return 0;
+	case 4:
+		 /* sign-extend 32 bits into 64 bits */
+		EMIT(PPC_RAW_EXTSW(dst_reg, src_reg));
+		fallthrough;
+	case 8:
+		/* Nothing to do */
+		return 0;
+	default:
+		return -1;
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * Handle powerpc ABI expectations from caller:
+ *   - Unsigned arguments are zero-extended.
+ *   - Signed arguments are sign-extended.
+ */
+static int prepare_for_kfunc_call(const struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
+				  struct codegen_context *ctx,
+				  const struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+	const struct btf_func_model *m = bpf_jit_find_kfunc_model(fp, insn);
+	int i;
+
+	if (!m)
+		return -1;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < m->nr_args; i++) {
+		/* Note that BPF ABI only allows up to 5 args for kfuncs */
+		u32 reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_1 + i), size = m->arg_size[i];
+
+		if (!(m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_SIGNED_ARG)) {
+			if (zero_extend(image, ctx, reg, reg, size))
+				return -1;
+		} else {
+			if (sign_extend(image, ctx, reg, reg, size))
+				return -1;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 out)
 {
 	/*
@@ -1143,14 +1220,16 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
 				/* special mov32 for zext */
 				EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(dst_reg, dst_reg, 0, 0, 31));
 				break;
-			} else if (off == 8) {
-				EMIT(PPC_RAW_EXTSB(dst_reg, src_reg));
-			} else if (off == 16) {
-				EMIT(PPC_RAW_EXTSH(dst_reg, src_reg));
-			} else if (off == 32) {
-				EMIT(PPC_RAW_EXTSW(dst_reg, src_reg));
-			} else if (dst_reg != src_reg)
-				EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(dst_reg, src_reg));
+			}
+			if (off == 0) {
+				/* MOV */
+				if (dst_reg != src_reg)
+					EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(dst_reg, src_reg));
+			} else {
+				/* MOVSX: dst = (s8,s16,s32)src (off = 8,16,32) */
+				if (sign_extend(image, ctx, src_reg, dst_reg, off / 8))
+					return -1;
+			}
 			goto bpf_alu32_trunc;
 		case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst = imm */
 		case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_K: /* dst = (s64) imm */
@@ -1618,6 +1697,12 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
 			if (ret < 0)
 				return ret;
 
+			/* Take care of powerpc ABI requirements before kfunc call */
+			if (insn[i].src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL) {
+				if (prepare_for_kfunc_call(fp, image, ctx, &insn[i]))
+					return -1;
+			}
+
 			ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, fimage, ctx, func_addr);
 			if (ret)
 				return ret;
-- 
2.53.0