From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCBBF37DEBF; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 10:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773052223; cv=none; b=axfOEmQGpFh9Jc91z6Pa0gOAPJ5JFkSiUZQ4rfvkJPg/S5lThgbkWuTZmgANjrNppRJdzFXE556b+UTCJK92lf9SodKpBMabumlvuEYTBb9uu6RgmzQ4fNZJWUFhWjqymUVx+d7cUU0HAbiD+qCn0n8+w2qRy2QDdxvx6s2fqtc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773052223; c=relaxed/simple; bh=S39RhiGVyimXCDjc1xM5yDuZY2cvR5hVkmeqHSg9+Tg=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HziSm9V/BDEY582fZrho78j0Ey4Yl1JOZyaZRrkwywv8HOJOhrAsWXepGVFHWy9X/jUFdDG+1Qta/dRzERo5AMFOrZmJddG+K6pCod6VsMaYxxLr91Y+Iefy0zpsvDePA5BICDePCWqaaMPjEU/7qTaqnMPpF1rNGEV72JAhszY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.224.83]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4fTtYy5PyzzHnHKh; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 18:30:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from dubpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.214.145.207]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D32140086; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 18:30:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.15) by dubpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.214.145.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 10:30:16 +0000 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 10:30:15 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Chengwen Feng CC: , , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Huacai Chen , WANG Xuerui , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Sunil V L , Mark Rutland , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ACPI: Rename get_acpi_id_for_cpu() to acpi_get_cpu_acpi_id() on non-x86 Message-ID: <20260309103015.000070c3@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20260309041659.18815-2-fengchengwen@huawei.com> References: <20260303003625.39035-1-fengchengwen@huawei.com> <20260309041659.18815-1-fengchengwen@huawei.com> <20260309041659.18815-2-fengchengwen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100009.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.83) To dubpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.214.145.207) On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 12:16:57 +0800 Chengwen Feng wrote: > To unify the CPU ACPI ID retrieval interface across architectures, > rename the existing get_acpi_id_for_cpu() function to > acpi_get_cpu_acpi_id() on arm64/riscv/loongarch platforms. > > This is a pure rename with no functional change, preparing for a > consistent ACPI Processor UID retrieval interface across all ACPI-enabled > platforms. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron